- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 20,778 (3.41/day)
System Name | Pioneer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R9 7950X |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans... |
Memory | 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310 |
Storage | 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs |
Display(s) | 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display |
Case | Thermaltake Core X31 |
Audio Device(s) | TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED |
Power Supply | FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless |
Keyboard | WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps |
Software | Gentoo Linux x64 |
This may not be a huge deal to some people, but I'm putting the warning out nonetheless.
I have a large balance in Bitcoins from my old mining op. As such, I keep them on encrypted HDs. My latest acquisition was a Crucial MX100 which I got with the intentions of enabling hardware encryption (edrive) with Windows 8 for my wallet file. I planned to use it with a TPM and pincode with edrive to protect them from drive/computer theft... I'm not concerned about NSA backdoors but more about the average thief making off with a large amount of my savings. So bitlocker edrive seemed ideal.
Anyhow, gigabyte says quite blatantly in their FAQ that the X99-UD3 supports it:
http://www.gigabyte.us/support-downloads/faq-page.aspx?fid=2894
However, as far as I can tell it is lacking crucial UEFI functions to support it. It actually freezes opal drive functions from boot as best I can tell and does NOT support UEFI functions necessary to do this. This made my whole purchase pretty much worthless for that goal, and I'm having to go to software encryption.
It's not a huge deal except in principle (I mean i7s have great AES speed). Still, I consider this false advertising. If there is a gigabyte rep here or something? I'd love to raise the issue with them. Otherwise, just take this as fair warning not to take the FAQ of gigabyte as truth without a good return policy.
UPDATE Nov 2015:
I thought I'd update this to let everyone know I just ran an edrive test on my system for kicks, and as of z170x, edrive support has made it into the bios on the ga-z170x-ud5.
This to me means our prompting got the edrive support into gigabytes main bios tree. Thanks everyone!
I have a large balance in Bitcoins from my old mining op. As such, I keep them on encrypted HDs. My latest acquisition was a Crucial MX100 which I got with the intentions of enabling hardware encryption (edrive) with Windows 8 for my wallet file. I planned to use it with a TPM and pincode with edrive to protect them from drive/computer theft... I'm not concerned about NSA backdoors but more about the average thief making off with a large amount of my savings. So bitlocker edrive seemed ideal.
Anyhow, gigabyte says quite blatantly in their FAQ that the X99-UD3 supports it:
http://www.gigabyte.us/support-downloads/faq-page.aspx?fid=2894
However, as far as I can tell it is lacking crucial UEFI functions to support it. It actually freezes opal drive functions from boot as best I can tell and does NOT support UEFI functions necessary to do this. This made my whole purchase pretty much worthless for that goal, and I'm having to go to software encryption.
It's not a huge deal except in principle (I mean i7s have great AES speed). Still, I consider this false advertising. If there is a gigabyte rep here or something? I'd love to raise the issue with them. Otherwise, just take this as fair warning not to take the FAQ of gigabyte as truth without a good return policy.
UPDATE Nov 2015:
I thought I'd update this to let everyone know I just ran an edrive test on my system for kicks, and as of z170x, edrive support has made it into the bios on the ga-z170x-ud5.
This to me means our prompting got the edrive support into gigabytes main bios tree. Thanks everyone!
Last edited: