1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Engineering Sample Of AMD Steamroller Based APU Spotted

Discussion in 'News' started by Over_Lord, Jul 8, 2013.

?

Do you think Steamroller will be a game changer?

  1. Looks like it will

    18 vote(s)
    29.0%
  2. AMD is incapable of such a feat

    18 vote(s)
    29.0%
  3. I hope so, I'm an AMD fan

    26 vote(s)
    41.9%
  1. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    Hardware news site WCCF Tech spotted an interesting entry listed in the Bionic research database. The ES (Engineering Sample) chip could be a part of AMD's next-generation APU series featuring the new and improved Steamroller core. While we don't expect performance to increase by leaps and bounds, but Steamroller builds on the Bulldozer architecture and has a target to offer as much as a 30% improvement in performance over the original core.

    A 2.3 GHz Turbo core is pretty low, which can be attributed to the early state of the Engineering Sample. Hopefully clock speeds hit further north of just 1.8 GHz CPU and 500 MHz graphics, especially for the 35W part. The next-generation chips will be manufactured on the new bulk 28nm manufacturing process at Global Foundries.

    Source: WCCF Tech
     
  2. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,697 (13.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,101
    As far as the poll goes, the answer I can give is "wait and see". AMD hasn't impressed recently in single core performance. When it comes down to it, that's what people want. More cores? Sure, people like that too.
     
    xvi says thanks.
  3. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,451 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,580
    I don't like the poll options. Its not enough of an increase to be a game changer. I do think amd can one day, probably not soon, pull off something big. I am neither a fan or a non fan of amd or intel.

    The only thing I get from this is steamroller is right around the corner... I hope.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    I think Steamroller will hit us at the end of 2013, or perhaps Q1 2014.

    I can't edit the poll options, I would have made some changes otherwise.
     
    james888 says thanks.
  5. BrooksyX

    BrooksyX

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    3,947 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    569
    I really wish that I had bought some AMD stock about 6 months ago when it was selling for $2, could have easily doubled my money by now. I really considered it. Oh well.

    Hope it does well.
     
  6. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,600 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,646
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD humbly admitted that each [construction equipment name] will bring up to +10% performance over its predecessor. That should put Steamroller up to 21% faster than Bulldozer.
     
  7. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,522 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,071
    Location:
    Mexico
    Steamroller should catch up with Bloomfield in terms of IPC if it maintains the 10-15% improvement from Bulldozer to Piledriver. If it goes with >4Ghz out of the box and a 125w TDP it could hang out with some i7s with the only drawback being power consumption.

    Is this still a 32nm part?

    edit: It's 28nm. We could see a 4Ghz 95w SKU *crosses fingers* Heck, make it a 10 core 125w SKU and I'll buy 3.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2013
    xvi says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    7,102 (7.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,281
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    Even if the performance increase is only 5-10%, that still makes it a better possible chip than the current Piledriver CPU's which are more than capable of running along with top end hardware. It will obviously be priced competatively in comparison to Intel's offering (I.e. pretty cheap) because of single core performance, which is a winner for those on AM3+ who want an upgrade if they're still on PII or the original Bulldozer.
    Sure, AMD are lagging behind seriously, but they still produce high end chips for high end systems. Any improvement on the CPU front is a win for PC user, both from Intel and AMD.
     
  9. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,276 (11.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,560
    if its performance is 30% better yet still maintains 35W TDP, its not a game changer - but its certainly good news.
     
  10. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    Interesting they are using 28nm rather than 22nm, given that the previous one was 32nm.
     
  11. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,673 (4.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,027
    i dont like this news editor. he is an obvious amd hater.
     
    birdie says thanks.
  12. Ghost

    Ghost

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    272 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    Unknown
    He is an obvious AMD lover. Just like 70% of TPU, according to that poll.
     
  13. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    I'm neither a hater or lover :laugh:

    But I'd sure love some power-packed products from the company to fight Intel
     
  14. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,405 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    568
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Poll could do with a wait and see to add to the mega neg and double pos replies.
    No Info on imc and nb damn
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  15. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    AMD has been a lithography behind for some while now, but have proven that they can stuff more onto each lithography than intel can, something that was admitted by even intel in the phenom I days.
     
  16. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    Behind or not I am just surprised that they are choosing to shrink it half-step rather than whole step at a time like how they used to. Perhaps power consumption is forcing their hand.
     
  17. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    or global foundries doesn't have a usable 22nm lithography for them.
     
  18. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    225 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    I think this is on TSMC's 28nm process. and TSMC's 20nm isnt ready yet. that might have something to do with it.
     
  19. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,405 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    568
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    28nm is stable as a node 20nm is still a bit off so they are probably going for low end high volume devices for mobile first with low clocking 28nm bulk process parts ,with a mind to transfer a tested core into 20nm high performance nodes later.
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  20. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    225 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    "20nm high performance nodes" kaveri-hint hint;)
     
  21. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,604 (10.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,102
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    With the APU's I wished they would add the extra L3 cache of the higher end desktop CPU's to compete with intel more on the CPU side.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    No this is on GloFo's 28nm process (last sentence), which made me wonder. TSMC has a stable 28nm though, so it wouldn't be a surprise if they used TSMC instead.
     
  23. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,405 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    568
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Imho when 20nm kicks in well see steamier 8 cored parts but not the fx variety im after, initially more high end apu types
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  24. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,891 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Singapore
    Kaveri was supposed to be here my Q2 2013. It's another delayed part in a series of delayed products. Hopefully this time the wait will be worth it. We badly need AMD to start performing better because it is quite evident that competition is lacking and progress has been slowing down.
     
  25. acerace

    acerace

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    252 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Malaysia
    No, you just love AMD too much. Are you a fanboy? Only you can answer that. :toast:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page