1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

European Commission opens antitrust proceedings against Samsung

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Jan 31, 2012.

  1. Cristian_25H

    Cristian_25H News Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,437 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,152
    Location:
    Still on the East Side
    The European Commission has opened a formal investigation to assess whether Samsung Electronics has abusively, and in contravention of a commitment it gave to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), used certain of its standard essential patent rights to distort competition in European mobile device markets, in breach of EU antitrust rules. The opening of proceedings means that the Commission will examine the case as a matter of priority. It does not prejudge the outcome of the investigation.

    In 2011, Samsung sought injunctive relief in various Member States' courts against competing mobile device makers based on alleged infringements of certain of its patent rights which it has declared essential to implement European mobile telephony standards. The Commission will investigate, in particular, whether in doing so Samsung has failed to honour its irrevocable commitment given in 1998 to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) to license any standard essential patents relating to European mobile telephony standards on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The Commission will examine whether such behaviour amounts to an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU).

    In line with the Commission's Guidelines on standardisation agreements (see IP/10/1702 and MEMO/10/676), standard setting organisations, including ETSI, require the owners of patents that are essential for the implementation of a standard to commit to license these patents on FRAND terms. This commitment serves to ensure effective access to the standardised technology. Such commitments were given to ETSI by many patent holders, including Samsung, when the third generation ("3G") mobile and wireless telecommunications system standards were adopted in Europe.

    In order to guarantee undistorted competition and to reap the positive economic effects of standardisation it is important that FRAND commitments be fully honoured by the concerned undertakings.

    Background on antitrust investigations

    Article 102 TFEU prohibits the abuse of a dominant position which may affect trade and prevent or restrict competition. The implementation of this provision is defined in the Antitrust Regulation (Council Regulation No 1/2003) which can be applied by the Commission and by the national competition authorities of EU Member States.

    The Commission has informed Samsung and the Member States' competition authorities that it has formally opened proceedings in this case.
  2. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723 (3.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,314
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    too bad for samsung, after get hit by apple they got this one
  3. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,527 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    The mobile device market is looking a lot like the paintball gun industry did a few years ago. For those that are curious, a paintball company called Smart Parts was awarded a patent for electronically fired paintball guns, or the technical term electro-pneumatic markers and they sued the shit out of everyone that made an electric gun. It force quite a few manufacturers out of the market and stifled innovation. Smart Parts went out of business a few years ago.

    I hate seeing this type of shit happen. Tom Kaye, of Airgun Designs proposed that all paintball gun manufacturers cross license all of their technologies for a dollar to make the sport better and safer for the people that like to play it. I challenge you mobile manufacturers to do something similar. Quit suing each other for stupid patent infringements and cross license your portfolios, innovate and compete on the open market!

    Or you could be sandy vaginas and sue each other because of a Slide to Unlock bar, or that fact that a device that's not manufactured by you has rounded corners. Idiots.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page