1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Finally, Gigabyte Goes UEFI

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 16, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Gigabyte surprised many last year, when it broke its decade-long tradition of blue-colored PCBs to unveil its first black ones. Pictures of the first black PCB Gigabyte boards were first dismissed as Photoshop jobs, but after some confirmation, news posts carried quite some shock-value. It's such small things that Gigabyte has known to be quite particular about. Not that it's bad, Gigabyte is the second biggest motherboard vendor because many of its rigid design policies paid off, but some of these could work against the company.

    One such has been the company's reluctance to use UEFI firmware on its motherboards. With socket LGA1155 and AM3+, we saw motherboard vendors of all shapes and sizes, including much smaller ones such as BIOSTAR adopt UEFI. Besides allowing vendors to deploy mouse-driven graphical user interface for the CMOS Setup program, UEFI addresses many glaring limitations of legacy BIOS, which hasn't changed much over decades. UEFI allows you to boot from volumes bigger than 2.2 TB in size. Eventually, storage volumes several terabytes in size will become mainstream, and that's when the ticking time-bomb that is BIOS, will blow.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Gigabyte tried to address the limitation with what it calls "HybridEFI", which is nothing to do with UEFI, but is rather an address-space tweak for existing AwardBIOS code that allows you to boot from large volumes. That still leaves out the problem of Gigabyte's notably slow and convoluted CMOS setup program navigation. One genuine upside of HybridEFI is that Gigabyte has been able to provide BIOS updates to many of its older motherboards with 16 Mbit EEPROMs, that give them the feature. Gigabyte is hence the only motherboard vendor with socket LGA775, LGA1156, LGA1366, and AM3 motherboards that can boot from >2.2 TB volumes.

    Finally, it seems like Gigabyte broke another big "tradition", that of using AMI BIOS over AwardBIOS. Award doesn't seem to have a template UEFI firmware that vendors can work their own UIs on. Gigabyte's BIOS team is known to have programmers who have had first-hand experience in programming AwardBIOS, which could explain the company's slow transition to UEFI. Spotted on working models of Gigabyte's LGA2011 X79 motherboards on display at IDF, Gigabyte is using an AMI UEFI BIOS with its own GUI. Add to this, Gigabyte found a way to give its AMI BIOS the huge advantage of its patented DualBIOS technology, an automatic redundant EEPROM switching technology that protects from damaged BIOS or failed BIOS flashing.

    Source: LegitReviews
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2011
    [H]@RD5TUFF, WarEagleAU and Jack Doph say thanks.
  2. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,785 (3.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,338
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    nice.
    UEFI is on the way
     
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Added a note in third paragraph about the upside of HybridEFI.
     
  4. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,540 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    938
    Looks a bit like the styling MSI just abandoned for looking like crap.
     
  5. random

    random

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,043 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    686
    Can't wait for this, was trying to find a reason to change motherboards but now I have none since they've released the new BIOS update for 22nm CPU support and PCIE3.0 and now I am hoping this UEFI becomes a BIOS update for us P67 users.
     
  6. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,652 (4.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,019
    that mobo looks sexy!
     
  7. XoR New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    27 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    what a ugly board :wtf:
     
  8. twicksisted

    twicksisted

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,436 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    wow they sure took their time to go UEFI! thats why I bought an Asus board when i upgraded to P67
     
  9. Thrackan

    Thrackan

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,482 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    656
    UEFI will be a definite argument for my next upgrade
     
  10. twicksisted

    twicksisted

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,436 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    those screenshots of Gigabyes UEFI interface look a bit meh in comparison to the Asus IMO

    [​IMG]
     
  11. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,608 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    920
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I don't see this as anything good to be frank. If anyone remembers what kind of interfaces asian companies produce, i'm not looking forward to it at all. It's usually all bling and nearly zero functionality.
     
    yogurt_21 says thanks.
  12. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    ASUS has the best setup program home-screen. Internal setup pages are barely different between any of the AMI UEFI implementations out there today. A distant second is MSI's new screen home-screen.

    [​IMG]

    It even has a web-browser.
     
    cadaveca and twicksisted say thanks.
  13. twicksisted

    twicksisted

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,436 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
  14. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,285 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,177
    I had a windows 95 machine with a mouse driven BIOS at work years ago. Some older Compaq's had mouse menus as well.

    Congrats the rest of the world on catching up to 1994.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  15. Thrackan

    Thrackan

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,482 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    656
    You might also remember that back in 1994, there was still proper rock music on the radio. Wonder if that will catch up too:rockout:
     
  16. random

    random

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,043 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    686
    Both MSI and ASUS are asian companies along with GIGABYTE. If you are referring to UEFI in general then that is debatable I guess.
     
  17. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,608 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    920
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I'm talking to asian products in general. But they are sorting it out slowly. In the past they couldn't get past flashy colorful uncompressed bitmap based massive interfaces for everything.
     
  18. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I had that, too. That wasn't an embedded BIOS. The machine would have Compaq's own BIOS without a CMOS setup program. The BIOS would detect new IDE, PCI and ISA devices on each boot. The mouse-driven setup program you're talking about would come on a bootable floppy. The bootable floppy is a DOS boot disk that would autorun a program. So basically, that was an OS-based setup program, just like Gigabyte's TouchBIOS.

    Edit. Wait, I think you're right. AMI did have a GUI mouse-driven embedded setup program back in 1993. I remember seeing them on some 80486 (pre-Pentium!) boards. I think it was canned because it needed a big, expensive EEPROM chip.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2011
    xBruce88x and cadaveca say thanks.
  19. tilldeath New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    200 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    I'm not really up to date on the uefi, but will this be a possible upgrade to existing motherboard bios with a flash? Or does it acutally have to be built into the bios at factory?
     
  20. XoR New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    27 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I had such thing too for my Pentium 166. It looked somewhat similar to GEM (and with that to Win3.1x too) but you really couldn't move any windows around :)

    I was pretty disappointed that later computers had normal ugly bioses but eventually got used to them :)
     
  21. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,419 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    583
    i think uefi requires more space due to all the images and whatnot, so many current boards may not be able to load UEFI even if the manufacturer wanted to. unless some boards have socketed bios chips that the manufacturer could send as an upgrade that have more storage room for the UEFI software rom

    ^ @tilldeath

    @xor and steevo. I was thinking the same thing. I think it was a packard bell that i used with a s7 166cpu. the interface reminded me of an early mac os. it was pretty cool though at the time. (still is really). too bad there were no OC settings, o wait that's what jumpers were for back then ;)

    as for the built in web browser... that's pretty neat. will come in handy if you need to google settings or forgot to get drivers (at least one would hope you can dl files to a flash drive)
     
    More than 25k PPD
  22. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,393 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    560
    Location:
    AZ
    this annoys me actually, there's a reason server bios's are still all text based. We want function, not pretties. Pretties are for clients that hit the applications hosted on the server.


    I like function in my bios, pretties in my OS. prettying up my bios and losing relevant and necessary features isn't my idea of advancement.
     
    Meizuman says thanks.
  23. XoR New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    27 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    my motherboard wasn't HP branded (there were no HP logo) but where from it was I don't realy know cause I bought it used. It was probably generic thing on AMI BIOSes of that time...

    as for web browser in bios asus boards with linux inside could write on flash drives :rockout:
     
  24. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,285 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,177
    Hells yeah, the machine shipped with 3.1, it had a whopping 32MB of RAM and a blistering fast 66Mhz processor DX-2.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  25. twicksisted

    twicksisted

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,436 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Yes i do agree with you, though with my upgrade i was presented with a choice of Asus with its slick UEFI bios option or Gigabyte with its half assed attempt at UEFI with possible future updates... you can guess which way I went ;)
     
    INSTG8R says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page