1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Firefox 11 Goes Beta

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Feb 4, 2012.

  1. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,220 (11.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,520
    add on syncing be good. also works as a backup, in some ways.
     
  2. 95Viper

    95Viper

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,374 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,582
    Location:
    στο άλφα έως ωμέγα
    I am an Opera user... mostly.
    However, I am liking Waterfox's speed and stability.
    Also, I have had not a single glitch, crash or any other problems, yet, while trying it out.

    Waterfox 10 has been released and I plan to give that the try out.:)
     
  3. Moose

    Moose New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    306 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Location:
    UK
    Anyone remember the huge difference between 1&2 and 2&3? It was like getting a wonderful new browser!
     
  4. enriquejmh New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    I can't wait until next week to see FF20 =)
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  5. timmyisme22

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    64 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Yakima, Washington
    I remember. Then they brought out 4 followed by 5... what a let-down. Hence, why I stayed with 3. Still getting updates and proud of it!
     
  6. ypsylon

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    As far I'm concerned anything after FF v.3.6 doesn't exist.

    Using Opera primarily (one of older not bloated versions :rockout:) and FF as a backup. Every so-called "new" browser have the same problem. All of them are Chrome clones which = to me DEAD software, totally dead.

    Really missing the times of Opera 3.0-6.05, 1st Netscape, hell even IE 6 was better [:eek:] than anything new on the market today. Proof that artificial progress is no progress at all.
     
  7. syeef

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    287 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    all these stupid update versions are getting on my nerves!
     
  8. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,542 (2.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    the speed of firefox releases has now shifted from confusing to amusing... is there anything else in the software world that moves though releases this fast? we'd be at photosop 45 by now..
     
  9. cheesy999

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,919 (2.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    581
    Location:
    UK
    If other programs moved this fast we'd have a Microsoft word 2010 that wasn't named after the year :laugh:
     
    wolf and Mussels say thanks.
  10. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,542 (2.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    what about cooledit? anybody use that back in the day? I'm pretty sure in 2002 odd I was using cool edit 3000... by now surely it would have been over 9000...
     
  11. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    That would be a valid point if the inflated version numbers didn't break some plug-ins.
     
  12. F1reFly

    F1reFly New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Messages:
    227 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Indiana
    i think FF is trying to keep up with Google. i don't think its a bad idea to move fast between versions for web browsers, if nothing else, keeps ahead of those trying to find exploits. But MS and Apple seem to be drop dead slow.
    Though if it wasnt for FF, we'd still have IE 6
     
  13. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,584 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Location:
    California
    true..

    all my plugins that i've been using since Chrome 8 are still working
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  14. lauri_hoefs New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Location:
    Korpi
    And the version numbering isn't the only problem. The "faster" release cycle also means shorter support per release. Except for the few ESR-releases, which will have an also fairly short 54 week support.

    This means that environments which require standardized software installations with long term support and reliability (large corporations, hospitals, governmental agencies, etc, etc.) can't really use Firefox anymore.
     
  15. H 3 L L S M A N

    H 3 L L S M A N New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    58 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Location:
    Sault Ste Marie
    At first I thought you were joking about the name but then I googled WaterFox and there it is, I will give it a try.
     
  16. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    611 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Location:
    South Africa
    I moved to Chrome after Mozilla went batshit insane with version numbers. I find Chrome a much better browsing experience, and of course it silently auto-updates without breaking addons.

    Might give Waterfox a try - already used Palemoon but wasn't that impressed.
     
  17. Lipton

    Lipton

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    68 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    v5 unified v2 and v3 which were very different to eachother. Until v5 came along I stayed on v2, but nowadays I only use YouTube and Spotify. :p
     
  18. Moose

    Moose New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    306 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Location:
    UK
    Everything said i still prefer firefox to any other browser
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page