1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

First Radeon HD 5870 Performance Figures Surface

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 14, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,542 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,643
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Here are some of the first performance figures of AMD's upcoming Radeon HD 5870 published by a media source. Czech Gamer posted performance numbers of the card compared to current heavyweights including Radeon HD 4870 X2, Radeon HD 4890, and GeForce GTX 285. Having not entered an NDA with AMD, the source was liberal with its performance projections citing AMD's internal testing that include the following, apart from the two graphs below:
    • Radeon HD 5870 is anywhere between 5~155 percent faster than GeForce GTX 285. That's a huge range, and leaves a lot of room for uncertainty.
    • When compared to GeForce GTX 295, its performance ranges between -25 percent (25% slower) to 95 percent (almost 2x faster), another broad range.
    • When two HD 5870 cards are set up in CrossFire, the resulting setup is -5 percent (5% slower) to 90 percent faster than GeForce GTX 295. Strangely, the range maximum is lesser than that on the single card.
    • When three of these cards are setup in 3-way CrossFireX, the resulting setup is 10~160 percent faster than a GeForce GTX 295.
    • The Radeon HD 5850 on the other hand, can be -25 percent (25% slower) to 120 percent faster than GeForce GTX 285.

    AMD reportedly used a set of 15 games to run its tests. Vague as they seem, the above numbers raise more questions than provide answers. The graphs below are clear, for a change.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Update: Here are allegedly AMD's own performance figures sourced from Chinese website ChipHell.com.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Sources: Czech Gamer, ChipHell
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2009
  2. Initialised

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    264 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Presumably the GTX295 compares well against 58x0 when is has good SLi scaling and a nVidia logo on the box but has it's ass served to it when the game runs better on ATi hardware and doesn't scale in SLi.

    BTW I posted these here first.
     
  3. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    wow. That is FAST.
     
  4. Initialised

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    264 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    My 4870x2 is starting to feel inadequate already!
     
  5. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Why am i not surprised that both benchmarks where done with AMD-Friendly games/applications ?
    Had 3DMark Not disabled PhysX for NVIDIA cards this would be funny....

    In any case wait for real reviews before judging any product, by NVIDIA or AMD.
     
  6. The Witcher New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    433 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Are those benchmarks really accurate ???

    I only trust techpowerup and guru3d reviews...
     
  7. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    Yeah and does physX = real gaming performance? No it equals an extra score to add onto the overall score because Nvidia's GPUs get to run again.

    Synthetic benchmarks mean squat anyway and the card isnt even out yet so we're seeing what seems to be premature drivers from that range of improvement.
     
  8. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,542 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,643
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    You can definitely trust us on the 23rd. Till then every media source is going to be the "drunk opponent at the bar" playing darts with you.
     
    AnnCore says thanks.
  9. sapetto

    sapetto

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    409 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    47
    Location:
    Bulgaria
  10. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    thats insane:twitch:

    100percent faster almost than the GTX295 in wolfenstein, i can't even believe that
     
  11. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,985 (7.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,536
    Hands down that is the most intelligent thing you have ever said. :laugh: You need not a grain of salt with these results but, a salt mine.
     
  12. csendesmark

    csendesmark

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    345 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    ATI ROXX ^^

    I hope I can grab my 5870 in this month :)
     
  13. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Some engines are especially nice to ATI cards and some to NVIDIA cards..
    Do not expect ATI to post Game Benches that favor NVIDIA cards and vice versa.
     
  14. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    If those official ATI benches are real, holy shitting cock nipples that's a powerful GPU.

    Out does a card with two gpus in quite a lot of games!

    And its not to far behind in the ones its not, amazing for a single gpu.
     
  15. The Witcher New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    433 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
  16. ..'Ant'..

    ..'Ant'.. New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    294 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    163
    Location:
    █♣█
    Nvidia will come back to hunt them down eventually just like they did when the 48xx series came out. :p But hopefully the price range for the 58xx series will be good who knows might get one.
     
  17. The Witcher New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    433 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    I won't buy any new hardware until they release the i9 (6 cores) : )

    Just to make sure nothing will bottleneck my next dream computer.
     
  18. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    they will but the situation is different now, when the 48XX came out the G92's were still competing with them but once these cards come out, from the looks nvidia isn't going to have anything to compete for a while
     
  19. aCid888*

    aCid888* New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,754 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Location:
    In a state of flux...
    These results are to be taken with a salt mine (thanks MailMan LOL)...the drivers are fresh so I can only imagine how far out these benches are.


    That being said...it does show its potential and I fully expect it being a contender for the fastest card out there and without a doubt the quickest single-GPU card.
     
  20. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    Those figures make sense (in the fact that they compete head on with the 295).

    The GTX295 was only about 15-30% faster than a 4870X2, and given that the X2 had a massive price-drop (down to £240 in places) and then went out of stock about a month ago, it made sense that that price/performance zone was where ATI were going to position their new hardware.

    But yeah, all that is very very vague. It doesn't even say whether it is a 1GB or 2GB model.

    23rd is booked in as a review reading day.
     
  21. MopeyMartian

    MopeyMartian New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    197 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    a) figures don't lie, but lies can figure

    b) yes, it may be "twice" as powerful but if it uses twice the wattage you can forget it.
     
  22. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    Imagine the gains after driver maturity kicks in like vtec
     
  23. Sihastru

    Sihastru

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    356 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    67
    Location:
    You are here.
    We do need to see real numbers (FPS) and not just percentages, because % is relative to something. For example 95% over 10 FPS is 19.5 FPS and 95% over 100 FPS is 195 FPS, and in both of this cases it makes no difference when you play the actual game...

    We need new, graphically intensive games since they tell the story of future games and not games based on old dusty engines.

    PhysX does matter. 3D Vision can be fun.

    It looks a lot better then I thought it would.
     
  24. Polarman

    Polarman New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,627 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    292
    Location:
    Rimouski
    It may be possible since the card has a lot more transistors, shaders, texture units, rops and more than a 4890.
     
  25. krisna159

    krisna159 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    65 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    indonesia
    just wait and see..
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page