1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Former Employee of AMD Sues; Claims Unsafe Working Conditions Causes Birth Defects

Discussion in 'News' started by zekrahminator, Nov 9, 2007.

  1. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    While we frequently hear about Company X suing Company Y over some copyright infringement, rarely do we hear about a lawsuit that actually matters. Maria Ruiz, a former employee of AMD, worked at Fab 14 between 1988 and 2002. When she gave birth to her son, she was horrified to discover multiple birth defects. Now 16, her child (Ryan) was born missing his lower right arm, and suffers brain injury and lifelong cognitive deficits.

    In the lawsuit, which was filed in the Travis County District Court in Texas, Maria Ruiz claims that she was frequently exposed to such toxic chemicals as ethylene glycol monethyl ether acetate and 2-ethoxyethyl acetate. Ruiz reported needing to receive prompt medical attention on at least two occasions, after unintentionally inhaling chemical fumes. Overall, the lawsuit claims that AMD "breached its safety warranty and neglected to provide employees with adequate protection against exposure to dangerous chemicals". The lawsuit also includes medical malpractice allegations against the clinic Maria Ruiz was treated at.

    AMD had this to say about the lawsuit:
    Source: Reg Hardware
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2007
  2. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,895 (13.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,301
    Now, I've told my 3 legged cat not to be rubbin' around my computer! Wow, this sucks! I hope the woman and her child make millions if AMD is at fault.
     
  3. newconroer

    newconroer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    I imagine she wasn't working during maternity.....I hope not. If so, then that's her own fault.

    If not, then they have to prove that whatever she was exposed to, was still in her system during her pregnancy AND did in fact cause a birth defect.

    And guess who would most likely have to fit that bill? Ruiz. I hope they paid her well :0
     
  4. Richieb0y

    Richieb0y New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    471 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    The Netherlands Almere
    in my country if ur pregnat u must work all the time and u only get 6 weeks before birth free

    i hope she get money if its not her fault
     
  5. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,115 (6.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,176
    Wait, I don't get it. He is supposed to have an upper and a lower right arm? How many right arms are we supposed to have?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  6. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,766 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    201
    Location:
    US
    I guess they mean palm and fingers...
    I'm pretty sure AMD is guilty, but they don't have much to pay
     
  7. rhythmeister New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    987 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
    Do you not have an upper arm and lower arm at each side of your torso dude? :confused:
     
  8. Morgoth

    Morgoth

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,795 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    250
    Location:
    Netherlands
    yea intel all the way :D
     
  9. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,766 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    201
    Location:
    US
    lol, go where?
    but seriously, that makes you wonder if AMD is worth buying :(
     
  10. TUngsten

    TUngsten

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,044 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    CT, USA
    :roll:
     
  11. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,553 (2.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    im sure AMD told their employees the health and safety precautions - i bet this women choose to ignore them and is now sueing, much like someone sue McDs for making them fat.

    not that i think that this child is unlucky but sometimes the company is not totally at fault, i hope AMD win this case but still pay a small out of court good will package.
     
  12. Fleekar

    Fleekar

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Messages:
    105 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    She's a Former employee, and her son is now 16 years old. Why sue so late? They were birth defects right?
     
  13. deekortiz3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    36 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Like a few people said... She needs to prove a lot of things to show that AMD is actually at fault. It could be that a doctor was now able to trace the problems back to those chemicals in some way.
     
  14. ChaoticBlankness

    ChaoticBlankness New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    492 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    A small crate floating in the Pacific..
    Or, and this is the more likely cause as it's an American lawsuit, she just wants money because she feels her life sucks and AMD appears to be an "easy" target. Even if the birth defects were caused by chemicals at the FAB.. was she following proper safety protocols?

    The article does state she unintentionally inhaled chemicals.. meaning she had an accident.
     
    W1zzard says thanks.
  15. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,553 (2.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    or shes running out of money and is wanting to make a quick buck, on the other hand her disabled son may have prevented her from doing this due to him needing 24/7 care.
     
  16. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,952 (5.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,074
    Location:
    Ohio
    /frowns at his 5200+...
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. LiNKiN

    LiNKiN Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,760 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    302
    16 years is an awful long time to decide to sue someone. Maybe it is a retaliatory attack....who knows. I really doubt that the working conditions are that bad. Even so, surely after 16 years, things at least have been improved, because I am sure the regulations have gotten stricter over certain things.
     
  18. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    It seems the chemicals are the same used in antifreeze... oh bad.
     
  19. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    i dont think this is going to work. the factories and stuff have to be certified and stuff so yeah. i think its more like someone wants money 16 years later and is trying to use her son to file a lawsuit against her former employer for cash.
     
  20. 3991vhtes

    3991vhtes New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,786 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    My house.
    She should of sued AMD when the kid was born, and why sue so late? IMO, it's a bunch of crap.

    She shouldn't get any money for this, and if she does, I'm going intel.
     
  21. 3991vhtes

    3991vhtes New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,786 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    My house.
    I agree w/ both of you.
     
  22. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    nice sig 3991 lol. too many clubs?
     
  23. Polaris573

    Polaris573 Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,281 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    718
    Location:
    Little Rock, USA
    My first job in my hometown was working at a convenience store. A lot of local factory workers would come by on their lunch break complaining about various symptoms due to noxious chemicals. When I asked about safety equipment I was told it was freely available but nobody bothered with it. I've also heard of similar practices in other local factories. This happens quite often. Workers are told the chemicals they work with may be dangerous. However, if they do not notice immediate symptoms, or if symptoms subside after they are no longer being exposed, warnings are often disregarded. As of late I've noticed that many people take a "guilty until proven innocent" approach with lawsuits involving large companies, I would just like to remind you the defendant is not always at fault.
     
  24. FatForester New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    971 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    If she knows enough about the chemicals to know that they're toxic, then she knows enough to not work around them when pregnant. The only way I can see this being AMD's fault is that if they MADE her work and didn't give her maternity leave. All in all, that's pretty awful.. but just because that happened to her baby doesn't mean she should sue people about it.
     
  25. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,163 (2.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    925
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    A Simple Google Of the two chemicals and this is what you get

    ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER
    ACETATE
    IV. Effects of Human Exposure
    Developmental defects have been described in the offspring of a mother who was occupationally
    exposed to EGMEA during pregnancy (Bolt and Golka, 1990). The mother was exposed during
    pregnancy by skin absorption and inhalation for approximately 1-4 hours/day to 1-2 liters of
    EGMEA. Her first child was born with congenital hypospadia, chordee, micropenis, and
    scrotum bifida and her second child (3 years later) was born with chordee, cryptorchidism, penile
    A - 68
    Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate
    hypospadia and scrotum bifida. Both children had normal karyotypes. No estimates of exposure
    were made.
    A single case report described allergic dermatitis which may have developed from contact with
    EGMEA (Jordan and Dahl, 1971). A 58-year-old woman developed dermatitis on the nose
    possibly from contact with EGMEA on her eyeglasses. Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate
    (EGEEA) was also present.
    http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pdf/110496.pdf

    2-Ethoxyethyl acetate
    NIOSH Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentration (IDLH): 500 ppm

    Potential symptoms: Irritation of eyes, nose; vomiting; kidney damage; headache, dizziness, drowsiness, paralysis, unconsciousness; in animals: reproductive, teratogenic effects; SKIN ABS; INGES ACUTE: Nausea, vomiting.

    Health Effects: Irritation-Eyes, Nose, Throat, Skin---Mild (HE16); Cumulative Blood Disturbances (HE12) Reproductive hazards---Teratogenesis and other reproductive impairment (HE5).

    Affected organs: Eyes, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract; reproductive system, hematopoietic system.

    http://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_239300.html
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page