1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by Frederik S, Oct 16, 2006.

1. ### Frederik SStaff

Joined:
Mar 30, 2006
Messages:
1,198 (0.35/day)
395
Last edited: Nov 21, 2006
2. ### i_am_mustang_manNew Member

Joined:
Feb 7, 2006
Messages:
1,854 (0.54/day)
11
Location:
Boston
did all the tpu staff need new mousepads, so you guys got a bunch of review samples? lol

seriously though, nice review. maybe in the future you could find out exactly how the lube works quantitatively

it's easy to test static friction with the mouse and the mouse cord and some weights, but to test it's kinetic friction easily one would need a little spring force meter.

put the mouse on the surface before applying the lube, and see how much force needs to be applied to get the mouse moving (this can be tested using weights tied to a string hung over the edge of the table (so F=ma where m = mass of weights and a = accel of gravity) and attached at the other end to the mouse). maybe see how the performance degrades over days of use and days of non-use

the spring force meter would be easiest to test both static and kinetic friction. attach the hook to the mouse cable and see how much force is required to get it to start moving and secondly to get it to continue moving at constant speed. if you just use a weak spring, this can be accomplished by measuring the equilibrium point of a spring (like from a ballpoint pen) and measuring it's distance at the same points in the trial as above.

springs react linearly to a force being applied, so take the difference between spring length at equilibrium minus spring length at both static and kinetic friction tests before application of lube, and divide these differences by the original equilibrium spring length (will give a ration >1). these will be your two reference values (refs = reference static, refk = reference kinetic)

do the same thing with the lubed version (take equilibrium length minus (static or kinetic) length and divide that difference by the eq length). the difference between the refs and the static one here multiplied by 100 would be the percent the amount of friction was eliminated (i think. it might be one calculation away, anyways. also my negative/positive value might be opposite correct. )

Any chance we could see that?

Last edited: Nov 14, 2006
3. ### stealthfighterNew Member

Joined:
Aug 5, 2006
Messages:
557 (0.17/day)
1
Location:
at my pc
wow.
My uncle had some generic mousepads in his van that say support dell on them, I asked if
I could have one and he said sure so I took one home. It is way better than my pokegay (pokemon) mousepad (had it since I was 6) Its colors are better for laser optics, and the material is better to move around on (mouse slides esier on it)

4. ### beachbum86New Member

Joined:
Sep 29, 2006
Messages:
102 (0.03/day)
0
Location:
Oh no, last time i listed this a dude showed up at
I got the F10.5 Func pad at PDXLAN 8

5. ### ProtiusNew Member

Joined:
May 24, 2006
Messages:
1,411 (0.42/day)
19
Location:
Wonderful Ohio
i have a beautiful radio shack thing

6. ### Frederik SStaff

Joined:
Mar 30, 2006
Messages:
1,198 (0.35/day)