1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Galaxy GeForce GTX 560 SE Pictured, Benchmarked

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Feb 27, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Even as NVIDIA is inching towards the launch of its next-generation GeForce GTX 670 Ti, it is rushing out the GeForce GTX 560 SE to stem loss in competitiveness to the Radeon HD 7770. Galaxy is readying a compact, cost-effective graphics card based on the new GPU, which is pictured below. Based on the 40 nm GF114 GPU (variant: GF114-200-KB-A1), the GTX 560 SE features 288 CUDA cores, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and a 192-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 1 GB [(4x 1 Gbit)+(2x 2 Gbit)] of GDDR5 memory.

    Galaxy's card uses a short PCB, its VRM area has been pushed to the front of the card, consisting of a 4+1 phase design. It draws power from two 6-pin power connectors. The card is cooled by a compact aluminum-fin heatsink to which heat is conveyed by copper heat pipes, and ventilated by a big (80 mm) fan. Chinese site QK123 put the card through a few synthetic benchmarks, measured power-draw, and OC performance. The GPU-Z screenshot reveals its reference speed.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Benchmarks follow.

    Benchmarks included 3DMark 11 (performance preset), 3DMark Vantage (performance preset), Unigine Heaven (both DX10 and DX11 renderer modes). The card was pitted against the GeForce GTX 560 (non-Ti), and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti, two cards that are its immediate neighbours in NVIDIA's lineup. In all synthetics tests, the GeForce GTX 560 SE sits halfway of the performance difference between GTX 560 and GTX 550 Ti, which is in tune with NVIDIA's objective behind this SKU.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Moving on to power-consumption, the GTX 560 SE card from Galaxy has a slightly higher idle power draw than the GTX 560, which can be discounted for random variation. Its heavy-load power draw (load induced by Furmark), is slightly below the GTX 550 Ti, which again can be discounted for variation. The load power is 17% lower than that of the GTX 560 (non-Ti), which is significant, and can be attributed to the lack of two GDDR5 memory chips, among other factors such as fewer CUDA cores, etc.

    [​IMG]

    Moving on to OC performance scaling, the reviewer increased the clock speed in fairly fine increments of core and memory clocks in alternative steps. The performance scaling was found to be fairly linear.

    [​IMG]

    Overall, NVIDIA has a decent option in the sub-$200 segment, looking at this data alone.

    Source: QK123
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2012
  2. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,559 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    What on earth is this for? Rushed out? Wtf? The 7700 is in between the long prior existing 6850 and 6870 both in price and performance. It's only new threat is the power consumption which this card obviously isn't trying to tackle... so how does this benefit them in any way? Maybe if they gave it a misleading name like 660 SE they could sell a few to Dell but they didn't even bother doing that. Do they just need to sell off old cores? Then do a price drop or something. Surely that's more time effective than making this junk.
     
    hardcore_gamer says thanks.
  3. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    i wonder how it compares to the GTX 460 SE clock per clock
     
  4. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Clock for clock it will naturally fail, in terms of performance. It has 25% narrower memory bus and 25% lower ROP count.
     
  5. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,228 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    846
    This card is okay-ish
    IMO should cost 129$ to compete against HD6850
     
  6. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,737 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,209
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I am thinking "why would they even bother?"
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. LDNL

    LDNL

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    467 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Location:
    Finland
    Special Edition? Is this better than the gtx 560 or is it just special because of a handycap?
     
  8. arnoo1

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    746 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    124
    Location:
    Netherlands
    it's cute xd
     
  9. sanadanosa

    sanadanosa

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    125 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Semarang, Indonesia
    I think GTX 560 SE is about too late. Imagine nvidia launch it in 2011, GTX 550ti fully replace the GTS 450. It will be very nice to compete 5750, 5770/6770, and 6790

    [​IMG]
     
  10. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    994 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona
    GK106 will be replacing this part :roll:
     
  11. loleafidas New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    83 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Somewhere I Belong
    560 SE < 560 < 560 Ti < 560 Ti 448
     
  12. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    442 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    This card is nonsense.
     
  13. borden5 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    66 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    i think they already have gtx 460 256 bit for that :laugh:
     
  14. coldtortilla New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    39 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Sub $200 0_o Nvidia crazy, they need to work out their pricing scheme and their naming scheme
     
  15. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Performance per watt, about the same as 560Ti. Unfortunately, the 560Ti was completely outclassed by the 7770 in terms of performance per watt. So while 560SE has a similar rendering performance to a 7770, it consumes not far off double the power to do so. Hot, and with a two year lifetime, expensive when it comes to power bills. FAIL for enthusiast. WIN for misinformed consumers "in the shop".
     
  16. xorbe

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    414 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    192-bit mem bus and 1GB? Unbalanced memory channels. When will they stop shipping useless d-sub?
     
  17. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    392 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    100
    In Nvidiaspeak, SE has traditionally stood for 'Shitty Edition' :D
     
  18. hella New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Hey!, I Have A GTX460 SE OCed @ 850/1750/1900 And It Nips At The Heals Of A GTX460 Non-SE 256-Bit And Its Within 10% Of A GTX560 Non-Ti... It Handles BF3 @ 1920x1200 On My Dell 2407FPW With 2x AA On High Detail With No Problems And I Only Payed $119.00 For It The SE Models Offer Excellent Performance For The Money. Then Again My SE Edition Has A Full 256-Bit GDDR5 Memory Bus.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page