1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Gaming resolutions

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Champ, Dec 29, 2008.

  1. Champ

    Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    807 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    Greenville, NC
    For gaming, are there any major differences in 1680x1055 vs. 1920x1200? I want a 24" monitor and I plan to get another 4850, but a 22" is easier on the pockets. I really want a 24" thou.
  2. Damian^

    Damian^ New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    552 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    1. Yes, The higher the resolution the better the quality but you lose FPS.
    2. SLI Crossfire benefit greatly at higher resolutions
    3. There is a change your AMD 5000 might bottleneck 4850s in crossfire
    CDdude55 says thanks.
  3. Champ

    Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    807 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    Greenville, NC
    I've been thinking about the bottlenecking too. I hate how when I built this computer about 7 months ago, this stuff was on the way out. I'm thinking about building a new machine. It might be a good time to.
  4. stefanels

    stefanels

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    907 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Location:
    Transylvania (RO) working in Barcelona (ES)
  5. CDdude55

    CDdude55 Crazy 4 TPU!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,179 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,277
    Location:
    Virginia
    Love gaming at 1440x900, just depends if you like gaming bigger for smaller.
  6. mikek75

    mikek75 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,371 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    Chippenham, Wilts, United Kingdom
    Thats a bloody good price for that resolution. My Dell 2309w 23" HD is also 1920x1080, but in the US its another $100 at $299 (according to the Dell site, you might find it cheaper elsewhere). Beautiful picture and brightness though, I absolutely love it. No built in speakers but then if you're a gamer you wouldn't use them anyway, so no loss!
  7. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,584 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Location:
    California
    Your point is not 100% right.

    If you compare 1680x1050 22" WS LCD vs 1900x1080 24" WS LCD, you won't see any QUALITY different between those two, except BIGGER pictures.

    The quality would be different only if it has higher resolution on same screen size.

    Example: 1900x1080 22" LCD in theory has better picture quality than 1680x1050 22" LCD.
    HolyCow02 says thanks.
  8. kysg New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Pacoima, CA
    yep right on the money, but also depends if what else you need. and if you do any work like photoshop.

    and yea you would a lose a bunch of FPS gaming at that res, worse tack on the AA and your 512mb vid card is starting to feel the brunt...and a bad cpu doesn't make it any easier.
  9. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    I have noticed no difference in 1400x900 to 1680x1050. I run 1400 because it's easier on my 2600's, but there is no real difference.
  10. Black Panther

    Black Panther Senior Moderator™ Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,561 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    Always get the highest resolution you can afford. Do try to get 1080p

    Yes it makes a difference - my 22" is 1680x1050, the laptop's 17" 1920x1200. The latter's picture perfect... I used to love gaming on the larger monitor but now I really see it inferior quality. :/
  11. kysg New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Pacoima, CA
    I dunno 17in with 1920x1200 though that's insane for res... I thought that wouldn't scale very well at all. but I guess that's the trend now for lappies.
  12. spearman914

    spearman914 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,339 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    Brooklyn, New York 11223
    Go buy urself an extra 4850 512mb. 1920 x 1080 requires at least 768mb vram.
  13. OzzmanFloyd120

    OzzmanFloyd120

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,047 (1.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    297
    Location:
    Pontaic Michigan
    1680*1050 is becoming the standard right now.
    If you're going to g 24" though I would pick up a beefier card or another 4850, because the game that put a little more strain on your system aren't going to be able to run smooth on a 4850 # 1920*1200
  14. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,919 (7.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
  15. iamverysmart New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    74 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    There is no such thing as that, different games have different requirements. If you don't run games with AA then 512mb should be adequate for the vast majority of games.

    Also buying a second card technically increases the amount of memory, but that's not how it works. The memory is shared when using Crossfire or SLI so theoretically it still operates like 512MB even if you crossfire 4 512MB cards.
  16. Polarman

    Polarman New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,627 (0.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    292
    Location:
    Rimouski
    Check out the "pixel pitch" when buying. Smaller number = Better image quality.
  17. ste2425

    ste2425

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,390 (1.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    370
    Location:
    Huddersfield, uk
  18. Damian^

    Damian^ New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    552 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    I cant make a valid comparison since i dont own one of those but what i meant is that since he is talking about gaming and video cards, ideally you would expect far better looking pictures on a resolution of say, 1920X1200 then you would on a 1680X1050 resolution.

    Thanks for clearing it up :toast:
  19. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,245 (2.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    Do yourself a favour and buy the highest resolution screen you can afford. You will enjoy it much more for every single activity outside gaming, like internet, email, photoshop, ms word, PDF reading, etc. And for gaming it will be much better IF your GPU can cope with the particular game. However, if it cant, you can still run it at a lower resolution and the TFT will upscale for you. It doesnt look so great at running at native, but is faster, AND is usually at least as good as running it on a lower resolution screen.
  20. blkhogan

    blkhogan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,315 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    648
    Location:
    If I told u.. I'd have to kill u
    I game @ 1920x1200 on a 24". Running a single 4850 was very good, 2 4850's CF'ed is great. COD4 everything running maxed out I run around 125-200 FPS (depending on whats going on)
  21. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,919 (7.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    So hows the 4850 handle those high reses? I have heard from a few others its pretty good!
  22. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    ridiculous, ignorant. Unless you are getting an HDTV, dont go with 16:9, if you dont know, the gaming standard is optimized for 16:10(1920x1200)
  23. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,584 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Location:
    California
    If I reduce my resolution under native (1680x1050), the picture will become blurry.

    The 17" laptop that Black Panther has probably has really high dpi (dots per inch), that's why it can handle such high resolution. I bet it looks really amazing :wtf:.
  24. blkhogan

    blkhogan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,315 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    648
    Location:
    If I told u.. I'd have to kill u
    Upgrading from the 3800 series was like night and day @ 1920x1200. The 3800's would run it pretty well. With the 4850's I had a very nice FPS increase in COD4. I would recommend this upgrade for anyone looking for more FPS at a good price.
  25. Champ

    Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    807 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    Greenville, NC
    I got some good info, but the question is will there be bottlenecking at either resolution?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page