1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GeForce GTX 480 PCI-Express Scaling

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Mar 25, 2010.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,975 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,800
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
    Ahhzz, mdm-adph, a_ump and 7 others say thanks.
  2. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,380 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,230
    I see.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  3. jasper1605

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,274 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    228
    Location:
    Ohio
    thanks :)
     
  4. SystemViper

    SystemViper

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,500 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    472
    i like the insight into the 8x vs the 16x pcie slots, again anothter sweet review/test
     
  5. Apocolypse007

    Apocolypse007 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    615 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    76
    Location:
    New Sewickley, PA
    So little difference between 8x and 16x. I guess thats a good thing though. If you were limited to running a card in 8x for SLI, one might be concerned about a performance hit due to limited bandwidth.
     
  6. theorw

    theorw New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    771 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Athens GREECE
    Great review!The kind u wont find anywhere else in the net!
    So 2% difference 16x>8x doesnt justify the price of x48 and u we should be just fine with 2x 8x of p45 right?
    Thought so too since i xfired on both and saw no difference!!
     
  7. TAViX Guest

    Excellent. So using 8x it's not such a big deal afterall... Good for SLI/Crossfire thingy
     
  8. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,893 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    380
    Location:
    Singapore
    Is it possible to test Sli and CF at x16 vs x8? I think the hit will be much more than 2% due to the increased bandwidth.
     
  9. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    There real is no hit with 16x and 8x whether you in crossfire/sli or not. Check benchmarks, 780GX vs. 790FX with what I seen the FX was slitly faster but still bad in price/performance when compare to GX.
     
  10. HillBeast

    HillBeast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    407 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Interesting that. I was expecting performance to halve when in less lanes but the drop was pretty minimal. Cheers for the insight.
     
  11. theorw

    theorw New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    771 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Athens GREECE
    There no decrease u can notice while gaming...Benching maybe but only when using say 2x 5970 etc...
    I have used both X48 and P45 chips on my 4850s and didnt notice a thing different in performance!
     
  12. saikamaldoss

    saikamaldoss

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    200 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    India (Chennai)
  13. Mac Daddy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    First off what an insightful review I had no idea that the difference between x16 and x8 was almost negligible. Great job and I read through the one on the 5870 as well :)
    I had a similar question but mine is directed more towards the bandwidths themselves in SLI or Crossfire. As far as I have read in either configuration it is ideal to match the core and memory clocks on all the cards used.

    My question is running SLI or Crossfire in a x16 x8 configuration or x16 x8 x8 configuration going to affect performance and stability?
     
  14. DonInKansas

    DonInKansas

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    5,096 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,265
    Location:
    Kansas
    This was already covered in another thread. Leave it be.
     
    dr emulator (madmax) says thanks.
  15. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,742 (11.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,676
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    No issues with stability, driver irons that out. Go ahead with a x16 x8 x8 build.
     
    Mac Daddy says thanks.
  16. Mac Daddy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
  17. dumo

    dumo

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    686 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    627
    Location:
    NYC
    Its gonna be a lot of HD5870 for sale soon:D
     
  18. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,291 (5.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,614
    Location:
    Florida
    [​IMG]
     
    dr emulator (madmax) says thanks.
  19. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,162 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,805
    Location:
    04578
    now this was very informative i love the PCIe scaling reviews on the new GPUs tells me exactly what i need to know for crossfire or sli on lower end boards and it seems x4 is plenty of bandwidth so a x4 x16 board can still sli and get good results from the looks.

    thanks again W1zz
     
  20. Nick89

    Nick89

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,742 (0.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    176
    Location:
    The Nevada Wasteland

    Only idiots will sell there 5870's for a 12% increase from the GTX480. you can get a 12% increase from your 5870 by overclocking it.
     
    mdm-adph says thanks.
  21. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    dugg
     
  22. boulard83

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    404 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    +1 ... sry +950 !

    I was able to run 950/1300 on the stock cooling. Whit water in it its a breeze ...

    This review is interesting but i think someone received some money for this review ;)
     
  23. HillBeast

    HillBeast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    407 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the PCI-E bus has the most stress in loading when it has to send the textures to the card, and then after that it is mainly instructions. I'm probably wrong, but I'd say this is why there would be such a minimal drop.
     
  24. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,260 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    967
    Correct. You are not wrong. Minimum framerates are directly impacted by this, not just complexity of the scene being rendered.

    This review is very interesting, but what it misses in the discussion is the interaction of PCI-E bandwidth, memory bandwidth, and chipset. The reason is that x16 2.0 is getting very close to memory bandwidths, give or take all the overhead and data marshalling.

    W1z is getting some difference in performance on his highly OC rig where memory bandwidth >> PCI-E bandwidth, so that it is the PCI lane that is causing a potential bottleneck.

    BUT for a regular DDR2 or DDR3 non-OC extreme edition, the difference would be much smaller still. So while it is nice to see OC figures to the max, it may also misrepresent the true behaviour for the regular user.

    Furthermore, if you have SLI crossfire system, the results WILL NOT scale in the same way. Why? Because the bandwidth needed to fill 2x PCI-x16 2.0 lanes simultaneously is getting pretty close to memory bandwidth, esp. with all the data-marshalling going on in the chipset.

    I would like to encourage w1z to do a follow-up to his otherwise most excellent review:

    1./ I would really like to see the results at stock.
    2./ Do a test with SLI/crossfire. The whole x8 x16 discussion is moot without putting into real context. The results will not scale in the same way as the single card set up... so therefore the results of the single card setup are irrelevant to the discussion about SLI/Crossfire performance under x4, x8 or x16
    3./ By all means, do a sensitivity analysis on how OC'ing improves the results, or indeed worsens them from a relative perspective
    4./ But also see how the results change by increasing/decreasing memory bandwidth by dropping a memory channel or two
    5./ As 1 but do the test on a similarly clocked dual xeon system with memory channel bandwidth to the max, and see how much the results pull away compared with 1.

    I think the results 5 vs. 1 vs. the original would be a very interesting comparative and help enthusiasts see the value of dual xeons vs single CPU vs x4 x8 x16 vs. SLI/Crossfire.
     
    Formula350 says thanks.
  25. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,260 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    967
    The poor man has to sleep too! Never mind about follow up analysis. The points are valid though.

    To flog an old horse, if a GTX480 works so well on a PCI-E x4, then what about AGP... it would have been fine too, possibly better performance than the x4 even, due to lower latencies :p

    There's a great review of SLI GTX480 over on anantech. Wow, the new GT100 architecture scales well. But OMG look at those SLI power consumptions, over 800W system power with a simple SLI setup! eek!
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page