1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GeForce GTX 580 to Get Price-Cuts

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 12, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,553 (11.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    To pave the way for the GeForce GTX 680, which will arrive later this month in small but sizable quantities, with wide availability in the months to come, NVIDIA is cutting the prices of its GeForce GTX 580 graphics card. The GF110-based behemoth of 2011, will now start at 339.8 EUR, according to European price-aggregators such as Geizhals.at. The new price makes GeForce GTX 580 1.5 GB cheaper than the Radeon HD 7950, and having a slightly improved price-performance ratio. The 3 GB variants of GeForce GTX 580 are priced similar to the HD 7950. The GTX 570 starts at 249 EUR.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Enmity New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    454 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Location:
    New Zealand
    edit : nevermind i just cant read lol

    cant wait to see how this card performs and if this dynamic oc feature works well or if its a flop. i am eagerly awaiting nvs offerings coz i wanna give them a crack since i havent used a nv card since the 8800gts 320mb
     
  3. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    That's interesting...
     
  4. Aceman.au

    Aceman.au

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,446 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Lol and so the price dropping begins... As per usual
     
  5. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Still expensive. I can see people getting 2nd hand cards instead.
     
  6. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,623 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    928
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Well, for 340 EUR i see it as a good competition even against current HD7000 lineup despite the fact its the older series. With absolute nonsense prices around HD7950 and HD7970 (both way over 400 EUR) this GTX 580 is a good option still.
     
  7. wickerman

    wickerman

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    287 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    What Nvidia would be wise to do, is release their high end Kepler products and go for the crown, and just try to die shrink the GTX 580 and 570 to go after the HD 7800 series.

    G80 to G92 transition proved you could teach an old dog new tricks and that by shrinking a existing die, making minor tweaks, and upping the clock speeds you could make a good architecture last in the market for a number of years while your competitor struggled to scale new architectures from their high end downward and still make them competitive.

    A more efficient GTX 580 would be a perfect card, knock it down to 28nm and rebalance the clock speeds accordingly and even without DX11 I bet they'll sell very well against the 7800 series. And a 28nm GTX 570/560 TI would really make a lot of Nvidia's cluttered midrange obsolete.
     
  8. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,543 (1.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    939
    And it only took what, like a year and a half?
     
  9. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,572 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    wow

    and there i was thinking the 580 was a revision of the 480 and had dx11 :|

    flushing the channels before a new launch, what a shocker :lol:
     
  10. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    It was always priced competatively.

    I also don't think it's as easy as just shrinking the pre-existing GTX580 to 28nm, it would take a hefty amount of reworking. Kepler is intented to replace Fermi as a similar but much more efficient (in terms of power and heat generation) iteration. I don't see them wasting time on reworking that design when they already have the improved version in production.
     
  11. hhumas

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Messages:
    551 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Islamabad
    I have sold mine GTX 580 Black ops today @ 460$
     
  12. Jonap_1st

    Jonap_1st New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    288 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    South Green Jakarta
    $4 cheaper, 7950 still faster on the most recent games (exc. skyrim) and consume 80-150W less than 580 on peak & maximum. but if you love your card, then what can everyone say? :)
     
  13. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,185 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    837
    With HD7950's super-massive overclocking abilities even 399$ will be somewhat not worth it
     
  14. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,543 (1.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    939
    It was never priced competitively. None of the highend cards have been for years. One company, usually nvidia, sets a price they want you to pay, and then the other company releases their cards in between those price points. There is no competition. It's price fixing without actual communication.
     
  15. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    I'm not saying I agree with it, not in the slightest, and it is completely price fixing. At this rate Nvidia's cards will be priced to compete with AMD's, so if the GTX680 is faster than the HD7970, it will probably launch at nearly $600.
     
  16. wickerman

    wickerman

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    287 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I just confused my terms as I intended to write D3D11.1 but wrote DX11 since DirectX is what we are always used to talking about not Direct3D. HD 7900 series launched as the first with Direct3D 11.1 support, which is one of the major changes of Windows 8 and one of the larger selling points of this next generation of GPUs. Obviously Kepler will be Direct3D 11.1 as well, where Fermi was not - Fermi was Direct3D 11. But there you have it, a mistake, good thing I'm not a brain surgeon. :wtf:
     
  17. eddman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    35 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Maximum?! That can only be reached while stress testing with Furmark. Which gamer does that!

    The real ones are average and peak values, at 88W and 85W respectively. Still a big difference but not that bad considering that we are comparing an old 40nm GPU to a 28nm one. All in all, 7950 looks to be a better choice, unless someone wants things like CUDA and/or physx.
     
  18. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    580 is still too expensive in my area, cheapest i saw was $440
     
  19. Selene

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    It really sucks that we are going to have to pay $499.99 for the GF104(now GTX680) that was slated to be the GTX660TI @299.99 because AMDs 7950 and 7970 where not as powerful as NV thought they would be.
     
  20. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    To me this price-cut does sound like it's going to be significantly cheaper than 500, say 350-400, or significantly faster than most of us expect now, because there would be no rush to lower GTX580 price to 330 otherwise. If they were going to sell it for 500, and it is 25% faster than GTX580, there would still be a place for GTX580 at 400 or so, no need to go as low as 330 and 250 for the GTX570. They would be making the new offering look very overpriced and it's forcing AMD to lower prices too, BEFORE GTX680 launches which is shooting themselves in the foot, because it's the GTX680 that needs the fame, not the EOL'd card.
     
  21. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,666 (13.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,060
    $499 for the GTX680? Lol, that would be a bargain. I've heard prices are going to be a bit more than that.
     
  22. Selene

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Normally I would agree but this card was intended to be a mid range $299.99 card and has now been renamed and price jacked to a flag ship because of the lack of competition with AMDs 7900s.
     
  23. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,666 (13.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,060
    It's going to be more expensive than the 7970. I could be wrong I suppose. Lack of competition from AMD? Nvidia doesn't even have a card out yet.
     
    m1dg3t says thanks.
  24. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,301 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,186
    I have not seen where Nvidia was releasing this as anything other than a high end card. Can someone provide a link, proof, or something other than heresay from some other post on another site?
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  25. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    It doesn't suck; no one is making you purchase it, if you can't stomach the price there will be some that do. So, Nvidia isn't pressured to release a high end part, while trying to implement some new wiz-bang feature on lower chips to achieve competitiveness… and that’s somehow AMD's fault. :laugh:

    So in your mind back a half-a-year ago or more Nvidia knew "with certainty" the reference 7970’s would bring about 12-18% improvement over the GTX 580, so with that they shelved the "top dog" embarking to make the GK-104 competitive. Hinging on if they can successfully implement some untried feature to boost the performance as need. :cool:

    Nvidia was able to even if already a "think tank" project; completely evaluate, implement and tested all the parameters to make Dynamic profiles features function flawlessly in those 6 months? A tall order, but plausible.

    You deduce AMD placed the bar too low, so Nvidia's running up to it, and figures ah! what the heck watch this… Rolls it shoulders back and limbos under the bar wowing the faithful! They throw arm up in victory saying we got to the other side; though with new rules ok? Wait for their next attempt.

    So A GK-100 is such the virtuoso in performance, power, and price Nvidia couldn't bring themselves to market it? :wtf:

    Don’t get me wrong if it works and they planned it this way (even as a contingency) when first setting out in developing Kepler… Kudos for them, and good game changer. :respect:

    While if they had apathy 6 months back and changed their game plan based on a speculation of performance, wow they risked a lot on what might or should've been at least shown previously in a trail product. :twitch:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page