zekrahminator
McLovin
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2006
- Messages
- 9,066 (1.36/day)
- Location
- My house.
| Processor | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V) |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430 |
| Cooling | Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU |
| Memory | 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800 |
| Video Card(s) | Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600 |
| Storage | WD 160 GB SATA hard drive. |
| Display(s) | Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900 |
| Case | Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window). |
| Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers). |
| Power Supply | ThermalTake 430W TR2 |
| Software | XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1. |
With over 10 billion dollars to spend, Google may be considering buying YouTube for $1.6 billion. While both companies decline comment on the matter, it makes perfect business sense. With over 100 million videos viewed daily, Google would gain all of what it has been missing in Google video. While they would gain all of the legal problems YouTube has been accused of having, such as hosting copyrighted content, Google may pose a solution. Coding something that filters copyrighted content from being submitted in the first place would be very easy for such a big company like Google.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site
View at TechPowerUp Main Site
) lol they'll loose so many ratings, for instance you can go to youtube and watch something like the latest music videos again after you just watched it on a music channel, if they have $10 billion dollars to spend why dont they spend $1.6 on youtube and the rest $8.4 billion on making the content legal?
