1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GPU PhysX Doesn't get you to 3DMark Vantage Hall of Fame Anymore

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 20, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    With NVIDIA releasing their GeForce PhysX drivers, users of the PhysX accelerating GeForce cards were at an advantage over their Radeon counterparts, reason being that in a certain CPU test routine of the 3DMark Vantage benchmark, the physics processing abilities of the computer are tested, and since the physics API used happens to be PhysX, users of GeForce get higher scores despite not having a physics processor device such as an Ageia PhysX card. This differs from a real-life scenario where a GeForce accelerator does both graphics and physics and the overhead of physics processing affects the graphics processing abilities.

    The relation of GPU acceleration for gaining higher 3DMark scores in physics tests has been controversial to say the least. Futuremark has now decided to update its Hall of Fame to exclude all results using PhysX on a GPU, simply because this was not how they intended it to work. It has also been updated to organise the results better for easier comparison. You will be able to use GPU physics processing to get a 3DMark score, you will not be able to make it to the Hall of Fame using it. You can use an Ageia PhysX card to assist your 3DMark score to make it to the Hall of Fame, as that's how Futuremark intended PhysX processing scores to assist your final scores.

    Source: NordicHardware
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2008
    Viscarious and Hayder_Master say thanks.
  2. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    i guess that answers damultas questions
     
  3. exodusprime1337

    exodusprime1337

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,188 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    342
    that is the stupidest shit ever. once again futuremark comes out with a way to uneven the scores. All because it's not an ageia physx processor the scores don't count, what a crock of shit. The fact of the matter is that amd cards are unable to do the physx processing on they're own so now the whole lot has to suffer cause amd cards just can't cut it anymore. Bullshit
     
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  4. Cold Storm

    Cold Storm Battosai

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    15,014 (5.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,999
    Location:
    In a library somewhere on this earth
    Well, all you gotta do now is use the tweaker that Guru3d has and turn it off when you bench.. Well, it was fun as it lasted.. lol :toast:
     
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    He's versed with it. I saw that convo on XS yesterday, now he's after getting himself an Ageia card. Wonder how he squeezes in 3x 9800 GTX + a PhysX card.
     
  6. PCpraiser100 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Like Nelson always says: HAHA
     
    Viscarious says thanks.
  7. ghost101

    ghost101 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,332 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    165
    Location:
    London
    No its because nvidia had more money and effectively bought the performance crown in this benchmark. If I was involved with futuremark, i'd be pissed as well. If AMD had the money, the scenario could have been the other way around. How does this tell me which card is actually better?
     
  8. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,177 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    thank god , that what i am say in nvidia physics support thread , and i remember some members make me wrong and they say i am troll too much , i hope they read this thread and i say now i am right and they are wrong
     
  9. exodusprime1337

    exodusprime1337

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,188 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    342
    it tells which on is better because this card that i have does physx and amd's cards don't, which is not my problem, i pay foir performance and my 2 8800gts's beat out most crossfire 4870??
     
  10. Kursah

    Kursah

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    7,970 (2.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,774
    Location:
    Missoula, MT, USA
    Hopefully looking at more than just a benchmark score! :D :laugh:

    Okay this is good and great, but if FM knew that GPU PhysX was going to happen, maybe even had it available to them? Why not make a test for it that is actually supportive of the technology of PhysX while Rendering to give more accurate results for starters...

    So it makes one's score fair as long as they went out and purchased an Ageia PhysX card then? LoL...I'm sorry but maybe FM should've kept this program under wraps until they knew better what was going to happen with NV's and AMD's technologies that have been more recently released...

    Really as long as my games look and play good on my rig, PhysX on or off....Vantage scores don't bother me at all...I feel bad for the world that feeds off of bench scores if this has those communities up in arms...Yeah I agree NV kinda bullied it's way in this, but if they have the technology, might as well use it! Claimed unfair or not, it's nice to to see for consumers using PhysX enabeled cards I'm sure...and hell now they can go check out much more entertaining pieces of software called games that support physx and hopefully use it TWIWMTBP!

    Interesting story, not suprising, I jus thope AMD can get some official physx too so fanboi's stop pissing and moaning and FM can then update Vantange so the PhysX test is "more fair" to both companies' cards! lol...:roll:

    :toast:
     
  11. Ryethe New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    34 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    If you read the article you'll see that they cut support for it because it's a scenario that is unrealistic. There is no game out there where your GPU will go unused for graphics and will still be used for physics. That just isn't realistic. Over on Hardforums, there was a post where someone compared the fps of a game using a 9800 gtx without Physx support, with Physx support and then with an Ageia add in card. The results were basically that Physx support on the GPU had no effect on actual fps since the graphics card was already saturated doing the graphics.

    My main point is that I think you should expect to see CUDA support back in 3dMark in the future, just that it will be used in a graphics intensive scene where the score only gets bumped if your card is truly powerful and can handle doing graphics and physics at the same time.
     
  12. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,890 (13.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,292
    You don't seem to understand. ATi cards are perfectly capable of doing physX, there are just no drivers for it. Besides, it's a benchmark! You still have PhysX processing with your card for games. Isn't that what matters?
     
    Megasty and Kursah say thanks.
  13. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    535
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    +1 I couldn't care less about making it into the "hall of fame", all it gets me is world-wide renown for doing nothing more than benching constantly :p

    I'm happy with my 4870, VERY happy with it. Just because an nvidia card gets more in a benchmark because of PhysX enabled drivers doesn't really mean anything. the 4870 IS capable of PhysX, there are just no drivers.

    You can understand Futuremarks reasoning, but you can also understand nvidia owners frustrations. *shrugs* either way, isn't it real world performance than matters?
     
  14. mrw1986

    mrw1986

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,111 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Location:
    Wallingford, CT
    No they don't. 8800GTS is trash compared to 4870.
     
    zOaib and tkpenalty say thanks.
  15. v-zero Guest

    Damn straight - you're an idiot if you think it should be otherwise!
     
  16. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    reason for this:

    real world scenario, i am playing a game, so gpu gettting used for gpu stuff, but the gpu cant give its all to physx therefore i dont get the same effect like when i have a synthetic bench running when everything may be evalutaed independently
     
  17. Psychoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    517 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    LOL, i was waiting for someone to point out the obvious here :)

     
  18. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,345 (5.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,656
    Location:
    Florida
    hahah in your face ppl who told me my physx card wasnt good for anything
     
  19. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    Source

    That settles that...
    Since they had to alter their filtering system to prevent scores from one brand of video cards (do to not following Futuremark's guidelines) this can be considered grounds for cheating. This may take a few days before we see the removal of all invalid scores.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2008
  20. Bytor

    Bytor New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,051 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109


    lolzzzz
     
  21. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    Plz ignore the bloody nonsense :rolleyes:

    Back on topic:

    My experience with the early PhysX software hasn't been too rewarding at all. Enabling it with both the 280 & 260 slows both cards down a bit in games. It might be great for benching but its doing nothing for gaming as of yet. The decreases can be anywhere from 5 to 10 fps. Its not that much of a hit with these cards since they're fast enough to deal with it anyway, but its still pretty apparent.
     
  22. Bytor

    Bytor New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,051 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    I have a Asus P1 PhysX card in the closet and hoping there will be a time where I can pull it out and install it with my ATI cards and have it make a diff. in games...
     
  23. Kursah

    Kursah

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    7,970 (2.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,774
    Location:
    Missoula, MT, USA
    Yeah it's gotta be a hit though...it's not like there's a seperate PPU on the GTX 2xx cards or anything...and having the GPU crunch even more numbers from a game has to take it's toll somewhere. I can only image what'd happen to performance on my 9600GT!!! :roll:

    But it is still promising if games can be created to use PhysX, and whether AMD or NV, enable it, drop a few FPS for an increase in PhysX effects...depending on what resolution one games at, 5-10FPS may not even be noticable or missed. Maybe they can introduce a PhysX performance level that adjusts in 3 steps, and/or scales depending on the stress and monitored performance during gameplay? I dunno what adverse affects could be, but I would assume some wonky physx and sporatic FPS changes...but who knows.

    Still promising tech on both sides, hopefully something good comes of it in the future! :toast:
     
  24. boogah New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    887 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    141
    Location:
    Houston
    haha good way to get people who want hall of fame to go out n buy physx card ^___~
     
  25. mullered07

    mullered07 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,648 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    Location:
    UK
    proof of that i want to see
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page