1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GPU-Z 0.2.7 vs 9800gtx+

Discussion in 'GPU-Z' started by sbinh, Aug 18, 2008.

  1. sbinh

    sbinh

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    29 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Virginia
    It seems that GPU-Z 0.2.7 cannot read 9800gtx+ correctly ..

    Below is result from my Asus 9800GTX+ ..


    [​IMG]

    it reads the Technology = 65nm, also Name= nVidia Geforce 9800gtx

    don't know if it is the tool or Asus gives wrong info????
     
  2. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,043 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,951
    the name is obtained directly from the driver, blame the driver makers for that

    when shrinking g92 nvidia forgot to update the revision number, it is still A2 like the 65nm gpus. so far i havent found a way to reliably detect if the gpu is 55nm or 65nm
     
    Jusic and sbinh say thanks.
  3. sbinh

    sbinh

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    29 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Virginia
    I see ... thanks for the confirmation. I almost attempt to contact vendor to complain for send "fake" card :D .......

    Thanks again.
     
  4. Jusic New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Here's a Screenshot of my Point of View 9800GTX+ with the new Driver he detects correct that it's a 9800GTX/GTX+ but what's with the Shaders. Have you overclocked sbinh?

    [​IMG]
     
  5. sbinh

    sbinh

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    29 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Virginia
    I see .. so 177.83 can report card name correctly.
    Would that drivers plays well with Folding@home GPU2 client?

    Thanks for the info.

    P.S: Yup. I overclock the shader alittle bit.
     
  6. Bazooka New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    But how can it be, that there is 65nm with 2007 release date? I thought that it must be with 55nm instead of 65nm!!! I have 9800GTX+ Inno3D. Look on my screen [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.jpg
      1.jpg
      File size:
      53.4 KB
      Views:
      6,878
  7. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,043 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,951
    as i said .. gpuz can not tell the difference between g92 55nm and g92 65nm so it will assume the 65 nm variant
     
  8. Bazooka New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    But where is the truth? 55nm?
     
  9. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,043 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,951
    remove the cooler and look at the core, if it says B1 or something else with a B it's 55 nm
     
  10. Bazooka New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Unfortunatly,i can't make it. But....Have I 55nm in real ?
     
  11. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,043 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,951
    there is no other way for sure, other than remove the cooler and look at the core
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page