1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Green Tea: retro AMD-nVidia build

Discussion in 'Project Logs' started by TRWOV, Feb 28, 2012.

  1. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,645 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,225
    Location:
    Mexico
    more benchmarks:

    PCmark2002
    [​IMG]
    PCmark05
    [​IMG]
    Monster Hunter Frontier
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Unigine Tropics
    [​IMG]
    Unigine Sanctuary
    [​IMG]
    Unigine Heaven
    :roll:
    [​IMG]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. [XC] Oj101

    [XC] Oj101

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    112 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    South Africa
    Who told you that? Getting 3 GHz stable on S939 is no small feat, I've never seen 3.2 GHz stable - out of the ~200 S939 chips I've been through not even my FX-55 which did a hair under 4 GHz could do more than about 2.96 GHz perfectly stable. The odd one (call it one out of every fifty chips) could bench 3DMark2001 at up to 3.3 GHz but forget any form of stability. Of course, my idea of stable is 24/7/365, for game stable I've gotten up to about 3 GHz.

    As for your memory, S939 had PLENTY of room to play with the HT speed, don't be scared to try 254 * 11 (2,794 MHz on the CPU, DDR508 on the RAM).

    Moving on to voltage, I think the DFI boards were the only ones which could supply enough voltage to hurt a S939 chip. I've run 1.62v for 2.92 GHz stable on a 3700+ for the last... Jeez, it must be closing in on eight years now. No degradation whatsoever, cooling is taken care of by a Zalman 9700.
     
  3. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,645 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,225
    Location:
    Mexico
    I made a search for "FX60 overclock" and many posts stated >3Ghz so I thought that was the average. Anyway, I think that I'm being limited by my board. I suppose that I'm getting close to its power delivery limits with this dual core.

    About the HT, anything above 210Mhz won't boot on my board. 206-210 is unstable, boots fine but fails in the second or third loop of Intel Burn Test. 205 is semi-stable, sometimes I complete 10 loops and sometimes it fails in the middle of the run. I've tried setting the HT at x4 ad the CPU at x12 thinking that may help but it didn't. Maybe the NB/SB is overheating (this ULi chipset is a single chip solution) but I don't have enough clearance even for a 10mm thick fan. I'll try with a low profile cooper heatsink but I'm not holding my breath.

    Another weird thing is that if I set the multi at x14 CPU-Z reports the speed as 2.6Ghz but the bios and dxdiag report 2.8Ghz. Still the Gflops don't increase so I think that CPU-Z is reporting the right speed.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. [XC] Oj101

    [XC] Oj101

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    112 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    South Africa
    Were these people talking about proper stable or bench stable? Most people buying FX-60s were buying them to benchmark.

    You want to keep your HT Link speed at under 1,000 MHz for maximum stability, the higher your HTT speed the lower you want the HT Link multiplier to be. For example, if you want to run 200x14 for 2.8 GHz you can do so with the HT Link multiplier at 5x as 200x5 = 1,000MHz. If you want to change that to 280x10, you'd need to drop down to a 3x HT Link multiplier as 280x3 = 840 MHz which is well below 1,000 MHz but 280x4 = 1,120 MHz which may introduce some instability. I don't know why you're stuck at such a low HTT speed though, all of my chips were able to do over 300 MHz and a fair number could do in excess of 400 MHz.

    Going from 2.6 GHz to 2.8 GHz is not a massive increase, it's a 7.7 % increase in frequency so your increase in speed in going to be in line with that. I see you were getting about 6.75 Gflops at 2.6 GHz, at 2.8 GHz a 7.7 % increase will net you a maximum of around 7.23 Gflops - are you sure you aren't seeing a small gain and dismissing it?
     
  5. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,457 (4.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,735
    The ASRock boards of that time werent known to overclock hard
     
  6. [XC] Oj101

    [XC] Oj101

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    112 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    South Africa
    I must have read wrong, I could've sworn an Asus board was being used. Oops :p
     
  7. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,645 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,225
    Location:
    Mexico
    A (small) development:

    [​IMG]

    I ordered more FX stickers since the ones I had bought previously didn't made it. The seller sworn that he shipped them... I've heard bad things about the Italian post so I guess he could be saying the truth. I don't know why finding an Athlon FX sticker is so hard :banghead:

    I've been playing some Scarface on my Green Tea since it doesn't work on W7 and I'm having a blast. I still need to paint the speakers though.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,432 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    616
    looking good so far!
     
    TRWOV says thanks.
    More than 25k PPD
  9. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,645 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,225
    Location:
    Mexico
    I need to get off my butt and put the finishing touches on this build. :banghead:
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,457 (4.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,735
    Take all the time in world. rushing a build can be disasterous
     
  11. ThE_MaD_ShOt

    ThE_MaD_ShOt

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,033 (4.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,663
    Location:
    Hi! I'm from the Internet
    I hear you man. I need to get off my butt and start my new build. Maybe when the case gets here tomorrow that will get me going on it.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,645 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,225
    Location:
    Mexico
    Got the sticker:

    [​IMG]

    It's bigger than I thought:

    [​IMG]

    There's still a couple of minor things I'm not 100% satisfied with such as cable management but in such small case it's pretty hard to do, plus taking down the system is almost like a jigsaw puzzle now (I need to put the components in a certain order or they won't fit inside) so I guess I'll let them as is. The build is 99.99% done now.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. t_ski

    t_ski Former Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    11,006 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,562
    Too bad you don't have a green backplate for that video card. The blue looks out of place.

    Great job anyway :toast:
     
    TRWOV says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page