1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GTX 660 Ti 2GB -3DMark11 results

Discussion in 'NVIDIA' started by afw, Jul 31, 2012.

  1. afw

    afw New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    642 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    TT have posted 3DMark11 results on their FB page ... looks very promising ... :)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2012
    Widjaja, gopal, Recus and 3 others say thanks.
  2. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    hope that TT hasn't mis-typed any scores!.. and also that 660Ti is priced not more than 300$.. then we have a winner
     
  3. Capitan Harlock

    Capitan Harlock

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    481 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Arcadia
    i wanna see the result in gaming and vs the hd7950 ghz edition if comes out
     
  4. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    Looks about right. Finally GK104 is where it should have been in the first place, mid-range. Too bad it had to be crippled.
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  5. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    TweakTown facebook says:

    This is with our 3960x @ 4.6GHz

    GTX 660 Ti is clocked at 915 / 6004 QDR -Shane

    Also they are benchmarking the card so stay tuned.
     
  6. cmaxvt

    cmaxvt

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    159 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    CA
    man this sure makes my 670 at $400 seem waaaaaay overpriced. I am right there with you crapdaddy. If only this card had come out at the mid-range price it was supposed to be and we were able to see an actual top end Nvidia product. I hate the idea that they just got to half-ass this one while twiddling their thumbs and charging double on a card they thought would only be a mid-range.
     
  7. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    To make it easier for you think of the guys who spent $450 on a 7950.
     
  8. cmaxvt

    cmaxvt

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    159 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    CA
    AAAAAAAND I'm better. :D
     
  9. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    early buyers alaways pay top dollar.

    The difference between 660ti and 670 is bigger than between 680 and 670.
    Wonder what the real core clock from autotune is.
     
  10. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
  11. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
  12. Fluffmeister

    Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    682 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    195
    Wow, an extremely impressive card. Apparently priced around 7850/7870 levels whilst punching quite a bit higher too. The 7950 just can't catch a break!

    Could be the perfect all round 1080P gaming card.
     
  13. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Pretty much what expected. Not sure about the price tho. I'd expect $300 for the time being. Less than that doesn't make much sense right now, unless IDK, they did trully get a massive preference deal with TSMC and TSMC doing 70% more wafer starts this qurter than the previous (and getting better) has trully enabled them to release GK104 in a form/volume closer to originally intended. This card even at $250 would be very very profitable if they can sell them in high volumes, like GTX460 and 560 did. But of course until now that's been mission impossible, not even close.
     
  14. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,121 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    252
    If this turns out to be true then its a great gaming card in the sub 399 bracket.

    Although something just doesnt seam right considering the GPU-Z screenshot with the 192bit bus and the ROP 24. There GPU-Z screens rumor to be GK104 wonder why he choose to photoshop it out.

    The performance hit should be more then differance to 680-670. Plus on some game results it keeps a similar fps decrease if not better then 680-670 and does better on higher Resolution % wise. From the graphs it seams the card performance % wise better at 1920x1200 & 2560x1600 compared to 1680x1050 results.

    In the AA results it does better % wise at 2560x1600 then at 1920x1200.

    Just odd. Have to wait for other reviews to give a better picture of whats what.
     
  15. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    They say why in the preview. They don't have NDA and there's no retail cards. So as they state this is an engineering sample by one of Nvidia's partners and they don't want to give any clues as to which one.
     
  16. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,121 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    252
    I read that but unless they were the only one who got a GK1xx thats odd..

    The other suppose leaked photo had different GPU-Z info. The two are at odds with one another

    All 3 contradict each other so far.
     
  17. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    Very few games were tested cant wait for wizz rewiew to see what's really going on with this card.
     
  18. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    Sweclockers seem to be right. You remember the 2 leaked GPU-z shots with a part with 1152 shaders, one 192bit the other 256? That would be the 660 and...?
     
  19. gopal

    gopal

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,027 (1.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
  20. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,121 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    252
    Since there all contradicting each other. Photophop gallore... GK106 ? and there just photoshoping GK104 info since its not showing up properly.

    Who knows...
     
  21. Protagonist

    Protagonist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    723 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    125
    This is definitely not my card, 24 ROPs and 192 Bit, i know it delivers but its not a card i would be proud to buy.

    In this gen if i cant get a GTX 680 at a good price then GTX 670 is as low as i would like to go, reason being i decided to stay away from crippled cards. The GTX 460 is the last crippled card i would like to have with me it had only 1 SM cut off, and its the reason GTX 670 is an option.

    But frankly i would like it if each card used a different GPU Chip eg GTX680-GK104, GTX670-GK106, GTX660-GK108,.... something along those lines, not a crippled chip.

    Oh and Nvidia should loose the TI variants and stick to numbers alone.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2012
  22. Rahmat Sofyan

    Rahmat Sofyan

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    99 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
  23. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    660 SE is always an option. So is 670 SE for the 1152 SP 256 bit card. It's happened in the past with SE and LE parts.

    Personally, if there were no possible names and had to choose only 2, I would believe more on TweakTown's card being one of them, because they have been completely accurate in the recent previews. Ever since they are in bad terms with Nvidia they are just leaking the actual thing before anyone else because they didn't sign an NDA, Nvidia apparently doesn't even give them a choice.

    It's also entirely possible that Nvidia is simply on a hunt to catch up the leakers and that's why we got so many different specs so...
     
  24. Fatal1ty39

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    90 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
  25. Hilux SSRG

    Hilux SSRG

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    988 (1.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    160
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Don't rush judgement yet. Glancing at the review it looks good but not the great value you got for 670 vs 680. I'm happy I bought my Gigabyte 670 in May.

    Hopefully the price is $300, but I have a feeling it's closer to $330-350.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page