1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Haswell vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Discussion in 'NVIDIA' started by Crap Daddy, Jan 9, 2013.

  1. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    a_ump and AlienIsGOD say thanks.
  2. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,433 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    494
    LAG, the GT3 car started after the 650m car! LOL

    Seriously though, at least they showed actual gameplay vs the previous Skyrim camera panning shots. There's no perceivable lag there really.

    Haswell's going to be a big hit for gamers that want affordable gaming LTs I think, but I don't feel there's much reason for desktop gamers to get excited about it.

    Seems I always time my purchases wrong. I was hoping to upgrade my CPU, MB and RAM in a year or so, but by then Intel will probably have switched to BGA solder-in CPUs.

    Maybe I'll just find a sub $200 deal on a 2500k and call it good enough.
  3. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,176 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,136
    The highest end Haswell in a desktop VS a laptop with no AA and only 1080?
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  4. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,433 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    494
    What part of LT with a separate 650m video chip vs INTEGRATED video did you not get? You DO realize the GT3 video is all contained on the actual CPU don't you?

    The PCB space and production/end user cost alone make the GT3 a much better value too.
  5. Ralfies

    Ralfies

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Messages:
    86 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    It's a mobile Haswell. It's doing on its own what a similar range Ivy Bridge+GTX650M can do.
  6. Liquid Cool

    Liquid Cool

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    311 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    I think with Haswell and after the next gen of AMD APU's I'll be looking to zip up my wallet in regards to video cards altogether.

    These companies have cost me 1000's upon 1000's of dollars...and that's just for water blocks!

    Good riddance...:D.

    LC
  7. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,668 (7.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,980
    Location:
    some AF base
    How cool it is roughly as fast as a desktop GTX 550 Ti/5770...
  8. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,176 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,136
    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/FM2_APU_Review/8.html

    I managed to hit between 950Mhz and 1.1Ghz without any work on the integrated of three A8's I built.

    They are just getting better and better at it too.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  9. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,337 (3.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,475
    I might upgrade my laptop because of this.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,801 (6.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,919
    We'll see how it actually performs when they have to stuff it in a laptop with crappy laptop cooling and aren't able to run it flat out with no worry about keeping the CPU/GPU in a specific power and thermal envelope. In this demo their running Haswell in a tower chassis with a giant tower heatsink on it to keep it cool. Come talk to me when they have it running in an actual laptop chassis.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  11. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,176 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,136
    ^^^I was assuming that people would realize this, but I guess that means that they have to read AND comprehend.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  12. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,596 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    i hear ya newtekie1, but none the less this is still a major advancement and improvement on integrated. for the higher end integrated you'll actually be able to say, yes you can do gaming with this integrated gpu. Even if it is at low-med settings. I had intel HD 2000 on my laptop and i can only game 2006 games at medium at best and low res, and newer game(besides torchlight 2) i can't game unless its absolutely low and 720p or lower resolution.
  13. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,577 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    944
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    So help me understand.

    1) Intel drivers are notorious for crashing (on their iGPUs at least), of which I've got plenty of experience.
    2) Haswell's great CPU leap forward is to integrate a GPU that can compete with mobile GPUs in one performance test. Forgetting that the thermal envelope of the haswell CPU is demonstrably (see the tower cooler) higher thermal output.
    3) Intel is still holding back on the AA with haswell, which even a mobile GPU of the current generation can apply to some extent.


    I'm getting the distinct feeling that the CPU maker Intel is feeding us crap and calling it fois gras. AMD APUs have been capable of better graphics performance for a couple of years now. Intel is getting on the bus late, and telling us their moderate offering is in fact amazing.

    All I have to say is that my desktops run off of Intel processor, with separate GPUs. My mobile tech runs off of AMD APUs. The budget constrained desktops I build have an APU at their heart. Intel hasn't shown me anything that might change that formula yet, least of all a stacked demo that visually indicates comparable performance in an easy test.
  14. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,123 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
  15. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,801 (6.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,919
    No, it is a major advancement over Intel integrated, AMD has been at this level for a while. And if they have to cut the clock speeds back down to half what the demo was running to keep the thing cool in real-world use, it isn't really that much of an improvement at all.

    Also, the notebook they are comparing it against is actually an Ultrabook, which has even tighter constrains for cooling.
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page