1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Have AMD drivers improved overs the yrs? Are they better Now then Nvidia's?

Discussion in 'AMD / ATI' started by sebastian869, Jul 30, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sebastian869

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    87 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I have always pretty much stuck with Nvidia GPU except once over 10 yrs ago last build i recall there were issues with AMD GPU drivers, i guess these days its less likely because of non stop new versions though if theres a bug in the framework then it could be some time before they fix your bug. Who do you guys think has more solid drivers AMD or NVIDIA?
     
  2. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,620 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,529
    They both are pretty much on par with eachother. I havent had any issues with the Amd drivers. Awhile back i had 1 nv driver issue but im currently in process of building a machine...
     
  3. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,708 (13.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,108
    I foresee this turning into a chilling and mature debate!

    I've been sticking to WHQL drivers and things have been going quite smoothly for quite some time.

    Generally if there are rampant driver problems, it will be known.... and there's not.
     
  4. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,351 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,117
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I haven't experienced many driver issues with AMD. I've heard about fewer issues other people have had lately than in the past though, but my own experience is that they've been fine for the last several years, but that's me.
     
    xvi says thanks.
  5. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    i used a mix of AMD and nVidia card those past 3 years .... no issue on both side with driver as far as i see


    indeed ...
     
  6. RealNeil

    RealNeil

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    275 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    93
    Location:
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
    AMD drivers are more mature than they were 4-5 years ago when I had a lot of problems with them. I ended up selling my AMD based GPUs and going with NVIDIA for quite a while.
    Now I use both without any real issues.

    They have come a long way in a short time. Using only WHQL drivers is a good idea.
     
  7. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,649 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    944
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Driver wise, they are pretty much the same. Interface wise, i prefer CCC, though the trey menu is a bit of a mess. It's just better organized. I don't get it why NVIDIA hasn't followed NVMax interface. I loved that thing back in the days. Can't understand why they make pretty much zero effort in quick FSAA and AF settings. Sure games support it, but if you play older games or you prefer it forced through CP (like i do), it's a necessity. For example in Natural Selection 2, you have only Anisotropic Filter ON/OFF. But even with ON, textures look all washed out at distance. But with forced 16xAF, they are nice and sharp.
     
  8. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    AMD on my laptop, Nvidia on my desktop. Both are doing just fine, you can't go wrong with either. Nvidia comes with ShadowPlay which is pretty nifty for selected customers.
     
  9. Champ

    Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    878 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Greenville, NC
    What about on the multiple gpu side of things?
     
  10. BiggieShady

    BiggieShady

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    995 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    331
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    They both work fine for most titles but I'd say nvidia drivers are more mature as in you can use beta drivers and expect stability with all games, with AMD you often need to pick WHQL driver version that has least issues with one or two problematic games in your collection.
     
  11. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,406 (2.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    568
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    I have not had a issue with either companies driver in years.
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  12. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    and AMD come with GVR and Replay (well in fact since the AMD Gaming Evolved app (Raptr) is not limited to AMD gpus like GeForce Experience is with nVidia gpus, you can use it with any card, unless they changed a thing in between, tho the auto optimize thing is a mess the rest is perfectly fine.)

    well let say both offer tools and drivers and multigpu goes to nVidia but AMD still does better and better in CFX


    +.jpg
     
  13. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,649 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    944
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I wish they'd feature more optional aggressive optimizations and new potentially experiemntal features. Kinda miss the old days where we got new features here and there, but currently all we get are stupid multiGPU profiles and that's it. Booooring. Last good one was MLAA. And that's basically it. Just more stuff to play with...
     
  14. ZentiX

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    46 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Location:
    Norway
    I have to say YES and NO.

    AMD drivers has become better, but they are too far behind nVidia when it comes to stable drivers.

    I was really stoked about going over to AMD and bought first a 7950, and later on another 7950 for CF. It was then I was starting to have trouble, terrible 144Hz support in CF mode, so I had to drop down to 120Hz. If you want to use 144Hz, you have to use 2 CF bridges. And this is not written on AMD, you have to find out this the hard way and google it.

    Now I'm on 2x R9 290X in CFX. Now I have problems with AMD 14.4 driver, BSOD when watching flash or html5 videos trough browser. But this problem came after an Flash update for 3 or 4 weeks ago. This BSOD is related to AMD drivers. 0xa0000001. So when I watch a youtube video I kinde hope it's not going to be a BSOD. I have sendt a ticket to AMD so I hope they are aware of it. Playing games is never been a issue with 14.4. So as long as I'm aware of BSOD problems with 14.4 driver, I'm using it over a unstable BETA driver.
    I do not dare to try 144Hz on my 290X in CFX, since crossfire is trough PCI-e lanes.
    ( I did not buy those 290X, I won them)

    But when it comes to performance, AMD is great. I have no problem running BF4 on ultra with 100+ fps, but I'm not a graphics whore, so I want stable FPS and 120+ FPS is great for me.

    When it comes to AMD vs nVidia drivers, I have to go with nVidia here. For me i feel like AMD is way behind.
     
  15. Sempron Guy

    Sempron Guy

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    255 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    79
    My experience with AMD drivers is not much worse than I had with Nvidia. I spent half of my time using the GTX 460, lookin' for stable drivers ( TDR issues anyone? circa 27x.xxx drivers if I remember correctly )
     
  16. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    7,122 (7.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,288
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    Back in the day, both NVidia and AMD had catastrophic problems with their drivers. Both people from each side would moan and berate the other. This simply isn't the case anymore. If anything, both drivers and driver software from both AMD and NVidia is practically identical now. GeForce Experience and AMD's Raptor are just goats with different coloured tuxedo's on. They're still goats though.

    Stick with WHQL drivers and there will be no problems. Although AMD did have an AHCI driver issue with a WHQL 14.4 driver which was instantaneously fixed.

    The only people I still see moaning are the ones that test out BETAs and then moan when something breaks.
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  17. neliz

    neliz MSI Rep

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    330 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    213
    http://hardocp.com/article/2014/07/23/gtx_780_oc_6gb_vs_r9_290x_4gb_overclocked_at_4k#.U9oqKvmSzDU

    there you go.

    Personally, as I get to switch both around and have mixed hardware they both have their own issues and I can not say that either NVIDIA or AMD is better, it is impossible.
     
  18. Octopuss

    Octopuss

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    841 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    93
    Location:
    Czech republic
    I never used any of the problematic features like Crossfire or multiple monitors or whatever, so from that perspective, I can say the AMD drivers are - FOR THE MOST PART - fine.
    In my opinion, the problem with AMD is that they don't give two fucks about fixing the less serious but still possibly very annoying bugs, and that can really piss you off.
    Still, for single card setup, I would say they are fine.
     
  19. neliz

    neliz MSI Rep

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    330 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    213
    If you think "multiple monitors" and "problematic amd" go in the same sentence, try to build a tri-sli multi-monitor rig. It kind of works now barring plenty of exceptions and "WTF" moments but there are plenty of times you hope NVIDIA to "please be just like AMD" when it comes to ease of use there. :p
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  20. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,279 (11.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,563
    Generally on par with each other.

    I've got AMD, Intel and Nvidia graphics cards in the house. no real problems with any of them.


    these days its more about a crap particular model, than crap drivers in general.
     
    GreiverBlade says thanks.
  21. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,030 (6.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    367
    Location:
    Texas
    If you had asked me about 5 years back, I would have told you it was not worth the time messing with certain aspects of ATI/AMD graphics. I had times where the card would work great and then a few others I tried always had issues.

    The first serious set of AMD GPU's I got were a pair of HD 6990's, after that I decided I was going to stick with AMD GPU's for awhile based on my experience with the whole system and CFX scaling. Right now I have my desktop on 3 R9 290X GPU's and my laptop contains a GTX 675m (About to upgrade that to an 870m) and honestly between them when it comes to drivers and support I find neither better than the other. I had trouble with the recent WHQL from Nvidia where my laptop failed to install it over and over until I did a clean install.

    I guess if I had to gripe about either of them it would be this:

    CCC and Raptr:
    Dislike the new overclocking interface (Im just old school sorry)
    Raptr (Though I like it) can be annoying with all the notifications and pop ups

    NCP and Geforce Experience:
    Surround setup is weird and just is not as great as setting up eyefinity to me
    The basic Nvidia interface is dated looking and a pain to navigate at times unless you know exactly where to look

    I guess I could come up with some real nit-picky stuff for each, but both work excellently at this point and games perform well on both. Were starting to move away from the days of drivers really being a lead cause for picking a side to the point where its just either the most powerful GPU, the GPU that performs best at the resolution, or the best price to performance.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  22. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,001 (6.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Drivers from both camps are fine. You will get people who have issues with one or the other, but doesn't really mean you will have the same issue. I have never had any catastrophic things happen to my system because of AMD or Nvidia drivers, just small things like performance or weird behaviors like the artifacting issue in BF3 months back, that was fixed quickly. Unless a driver causes system corruption, a dead card, etc, I could care less about the little "issues." Life goes on.
     
  23. Misaki

    Misaki

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Messages:
    185 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    199
    Location:
    Bełchatów, Poland
    In my opinion AMD drivers >>> Nvidia drivers.
     
  24. m0nt3

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2013
    Messages:
    224 (0.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    last major driver issue I remember dealing with was nvidia drivers for the 7xxx series and windows vista. That was a mess.
     
  25. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,568 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    537
    I've gone back and forth from a Ti 4200 on an AMD CPU rig, to the X800XT and X1950Pro on an Intel P4 rig, to a GTS 250 then my current HD7970 on my latest i7 950 rig.

    The X800XT and X1950Pro series had their driver pains, and I was a bit miffed that the X1950Pro shortly after getting it was relegated to Legacy driver support. That's partly me buying very late in the model cycle, but it's worth mentioning that others with just as old if not older Nvidia GPUs at the time were not having problems with driver support. With Nvidia it wasn't so much about individualized software support as their older GPU architecture being more compatible than ATI's was with newer drivers I think. So you got more trouble free life out of them.

    Lately though, as mentioned, AMD's drivers are just as good, sometimes depending on the game, even better at launch than Nvidia's. When I first got my 7970, AMD was releasing new drivers like candy every 1 to 3 months. Now they release less often and usually only include support for the newest GPUs or APUs, or have Crossfire performance gains on certain games.

    What worries me is with AMD's tight budget and recent HUGE staff cuts, this focus on new GPUs and Crossfire has them neglecting to look for performance gains and driver fixes with older model single GPU performance, even on major titles.

    On capture support, ShadowPlay is ahead of Raptr's Game DVR on features and performance, but Game DVR is still in beta. One of the key differences is Game DVR can record only half the chached gameplay of ShadowPlay's 20 minutes, and let's face it, the caching is THE unique and convenient feature in these tools.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page