1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HD 2900 XT Benchies 1GB DDR4 Edition !!!

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by zOaib, Jul 10, 2007.

  1. zOaib New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    985 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    FL
    Vital System Info
    E6600 @ 3375 MHz (9x375)
    4 GB DDR2-750 4-4-4-12
    Raptor 150 GB
    Vista Ultimate 64-bit

    Drivers Used
    nVidia Forceware 158.24 (current official driver)
    AMD Catalyst 7.6 (current official driver)

    Driver Settings
    nV 3D settings: top bottom
    AMD 3D settings: top middle bottom

    8800 GTX OC 768 MB clocks at defaults: 594/1404/900 (slightly higher than the reference 8800 GTX's 575/1350/900)
    HD 2900 XT 1024 MB clocks: 825/1050

    For all benchs, i ran tests at least twice, usually 3 times actually, & if there was more than a slight difference in scores, then 4 or more.
    Results posted are averaged from the multiple runs.



    Benchmarks!


    3Dmark01 default
    8800 GTX - 46773
    2900 XT - 44147.67


    3DMark05 default
    8800 GTX - 17841.67
    2900 XT - 19681
    3DMark05 @ 2560x1600 4xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 8163
    2900 XT - 7186
    3DMark05 @ 2560x1600 0xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 10985
    2900 XT - 10392
    3DMark05 @ 1600x1200 4xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 11834
    2900 XT - 11471


    3DMark06 default
    8800 GTX - 10636.5
    2900 XT - 11501.5
    3DMark06 @ 2560x1600 4xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 4579.5
    2900 XT - 4392.5
    3DMark06 @ 2560x1600 0xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 6645
    2900 XT - 6079
    3DMark06 @ 1600x1200 4xAA/16xAF
    8800 GTX - 7219
    2900 XT - 6641.5


    Company of Heroes built in bench @ 2560x1600 maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 20.8 fps
    ave - 48.23 fps
    max - 121.07 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 18.17 fps
    ave - 44.27 fps
    max - 85.93 fps
    Company of Heroes built in bench @ 2560x1600 maxed no AA
    8800 GTX
    min - 21.47
    ave - 53.13
    max - 129.97
    2900 XT
    min - 19.67 fps
    ave - 53.6 fps
    max - 107.1 fps
    Company of Heroes built in bench @ 1600x1200 maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 47.17 fps
    ave - 88.03 fps
    max - 217.23 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 47.3 fps
    ave - 103.17 fps
    max - 209.67 fps


    F.E.A.R. built in bench @ 2560x1600 everything maxed except soft shadows (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX
    min - 20 fps
    ave - 36.33 fps
    max - 86.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 12.33 fps
    ave - 36.33 fps
    max - 72.67 fps
    F.E.A.R. built in bench @ 2560x1600 everything maxed incl. soft shadows (0xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX
    min - 22.5 fps
    ave - 40 fps
    max - 74.5 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 25 fps
    ave - 39 fps
    max - 67 fps
    F.E.A.R. built in bench @ 1600x1200 everything maxed except soft shadows (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX
    min - 40.25 fps
    ave - 71.75 fps
    max - 137.25 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 23.25 fps
    ave - 66.5 fps
    max - 133 fps


    CS: Source built in bench @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (4xMSAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 162.68 fps average
    2900 XT - 102.03 fps average
    CS: Source built in bench @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (0xMSAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 240.26 fps average
    2900 XT - 178.21 fps average
    CS: Source built in bench @ 1600x1200 everything maxed (4xMSAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 224.17 fps average
    2900 XT -158.92 fps average


    Painkiller built in timedemo 1 @ 2560x1600 maxed (4x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 5.37 fps
    ave - 216.49 fps
    max - 500.27 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 26.36 fps
    ave - 147.54 fps
    max - 501.55 fps
    Painkiller built in timedemo 1 @ 2560x1600 maxed (0x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 22.38 fps
    ave - 246.75 fps
    max - 512 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 31.94 fps
    ave - 246.23 fps
    max - 502.84 fps
    Painkiller built in timedemo 1 @ 1600x1200 maxed (4x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 10.7 fps
    ave - 253.1 fps
    max - 502.2 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 37.04 fps
    ave - 237.73 fps
    max - 512 fps

    Painkiller built in timedemo 2 @ 2560x1600 maxed (4x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 1.8 fps
    ave - 167.74 fps
    max - 502.2 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 11.44 fps
    ave - 162.26 fps
    max - 512 fps
    Painkiller built in timedemo 2 @ 2560x1600 maxed (0x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 8.67 fps
    ave - 216.90 fps
    max - 768 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 12.54 fps
    ave - 211.81 fps
    max - 853.33 fps
    Painkiller built in timedemo 2 @ 1600x1200 maxed (4x MSAA)
    8800 GTX
    min - 8.67 fps
    ave - 215.12 fps
    max - 768 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 12.24 fps
    ave - 216.92 fps
    max - 1024 fps


    Prey HOC bench 1 @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ boost enabled (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 48.95 fps average
    2900 XT - 45.3 fps average
    Prey HOC bench 1 @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ boost enabled (0xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 76.5 fps average
    2900 XT - 76.27 fps average
    Prey HOC bench 1 @ 1600x1200 maxed w/ boost enabled (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 81.07 fps average
    2900 XT - 79.4 fps average

    Prey HOC bench 2 @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ boost enabled (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 42.85 fps average
    2900 XT - 42.15 fps average
    Prey HOC bench 2 @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ boost enabled (0xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 66.03 fps average
    2900 XT - 62.73 fps average
    Prey HOC bench 2 @ 1600x1200 maxed w/ boost enabled (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 70.37 fps average
    2900 XT - 70.05 fps average


    Doom 3 built in timedemo @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (4xAA)
    8800 GTX - 54.75 fps average
    2900 XT - 66.45 fps average
    Doom 3 built in timedemo @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (0xAA)
    8800 GTX - 112.4 fps average
    2900 XT - 104.4 fps average
    Doom 3 built in timedemo @ 1600x1200 everything maxed (4xAA)
    8800 GTX - 102 fps average
    2900 XT - 124.5 fps average


    S.T.A.L.K.E.R. "buildings_timedemo" flyby (Fraps) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 32.67 fps
    ave - 63.506 fps
    max - 217.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 21.33 fps
    ave - 47.04 fps
    max - 193.33 fps
    S.T.A.L.K.E.R. "buildings_timedemo" flyby (Fraps) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed no AA
    8800 GTX
    min - 32.67 fps
    ave - 63.69 fps
    max - 219.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 21.33 fps
    ave - 46.62 fps
    max - 196 fps
    S.T.A.L.K.E.R. "buildings_timedemo" flyby (Fraps) @ 1600x1200 everything maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 53.33 fps
    ave - 89.65 fps
    max - 233.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 38.33
    ave - 78.05
    max - 316.67

    Quake 4 HOC bench @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ Ultra settings (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 107.33 fps average
    2900 XT - 97 fps average
    Quake 4 HOC bench @ 2560x1600 maxed w/ Ultra settings (0xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 113 fps average
    2900 XT - 103.33 fps average
    Quake 4 HOC bench @ 1600x1200 maxed w/ Ultra settings (4xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX - 108.67 fps average
    2900 XT - 107.5 fps average


    UT2k4 Umark ONS-AlenjaForest-SE @ 1600x1200 maxed (8xAA/16xAF)
    8800 GTX
    min - 18.69 fps
    ave - 74.71 fps
    max - 176.29 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 16.82 fps
    ave - 74.01 fps
    max - 166.54 fps


    Oblivion (Fraps indoor run) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (4xAA + HDR)
    8800 GTX
    min - 33 fps
    ave - 50.54 fps
    max - 86 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 30.33 fps
    ave - 43.2 fps
    max - 77.67 fps
    Oblivion (Fraps indoor run) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (4xAA - no HDR/Bloom)
    8800 GTX
    min - 36 fps
    ave - 54.78 fps
    max - 105.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 33.33 fps
    ave - 48.71 fps
    max - 87 fps
    Oblivion (Fraps indoor run) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed (0xAA + HDR)
    8800 GTX
    min - 35.33 fps
    ave - 61.76 fps
    max - 112.67 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 33.33 fps
    ave - 53.21 fps
    max - 99.33 fps
    Oblivion (Fraps indoor run) @ 1600x1200 everything maxed (4xAA + HDR)
    8800 GTX
    min - 33.67
    ave - 68.18
    max - 134.67
    2900 XT
    min - 34
    ave - 60.41
    max - 125


    Infernal (Fraps outdoor run) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 26.67
    ave - 36.81
    max - 50.33
    2900 XT
    min - 15.67 fps
    ave - 20.15 fps
    max - 27 fps
    Infernal (Fraps outdoor run) @ 2560x1600 everything maxed no AA
    8800 GTX
    min - 81.33 fps
    ave - 111.07 fps
    max - 150 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 44 fps
    ave - 53.98 fps
    max - 68.5 fps
    Infernal (Fraps outdoor run) @ 1600x1200 everything maxed
    8800 GTX
    min - 59 fps
    ave - 86.09 fps
    max - 128.33 fps
    2900 XT
    min - 30 fps
    ave - 37.01 fps
    max - 43.5 fps

    Call of Juarez DX10 demo doesn't run w/o BSODs on the 8800, & it artifacts on the 2900 @ 825/1050, so i have to lower the core speed to around 780.
    Oddly enough, no other games have any problems with the HD 2900 XT @ 825/1050.

    thanks to Anandtech people from their forums
    http://forums.anandtech.com/message...2065772&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
     
  2. DrunkenMafia

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,277 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Location:
    Cairns QLD, Aussie
    nice thread man, I like it simple like that so I can read it quickly. The 8800 still has more balls I reckon but the 2900 is about 300 bucks cheaper in Aussie...

    I know which one I would choose.
     
  3. d44ve New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,521 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    309
    Thanks for the very in depth comparisions......

    It must have taken you a long time!
     
  4. theonetruewill New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,996 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    240
    Location:
    London - Close your eyes and you'll see me
    I agree, good work. Seems like the 2900 doesn't keep up at the higher resolutions...oh well
     
  5. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    ehh waiting for newer drivers, but considering this is almost as cheap as a 8800 gts 640 mb, it looks like the 2900 1gb is alot more worth it than a 2900 512 mb, but it's still runs hot and is an energy hot :(
     
  6. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    No 8-pin installed, and he didn't do a fresh install between cards.

    But

    It gives a pretty good idea on where it's at performance wise in vista.
     
  7. largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    What are GDDR4 chips on the 1GB card rated to?
    0.6ns?
     
  8. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    those are the bc09s from what I've been told.
    No one has posted that they have bc06 yet.
     
  9. Wayward

    Wayward New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    235 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Excellent work! This must have taken awhile. Your results are definitely worth pondering over. :toast:
     
  10. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    The 1gb X2900XT is 300 more in Australia than the 8800GTX ? Its 90euros cheaper than the GTX in Greece...
    In any case i think we all knew who the winner would be so no surprise comes from these benchmarks although i have to say they are quite thorough:)
    Bravo ZOAIB !

    PS : I just saw you have the X2900XT overclocked pretty much but the GTX is almost at stock speeds...Why ? You could push the GTX at 620-650 without artifacts and with the stock cooler and no vcore increase...Imagine the Margins we would get then.....If AMD/ATI dont shape up quick we will need to spend 600$ on cards :p
     
  11. zOaib New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    985 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    FL
    i have to thank anadtech members to help me out to get this bench together for a overall perspective ............ but to be honest if i were to run vista on my pc right now i wud go with radeon , since it handles the vista frame real well and more stable than nvidia at this moment , also since i only paid 480 bucks for the 1gb i consider it well placed in the price/perfomrance range ........... although i have to be honest i am currently selling my hd 2900 xt on ebay cause they are out of stock in USA at the moment and couple of sites who still have them are selling them at ridiculous prices , i can prolly get 550 bucks from ebay for it , and then ill add another 100 bucks and just get the Damn Ultra , and wait for drivers to get fixed and then get vista to run permanently on my pc ............. so fingers crossed for my endeavor lol.
     
  12. zOaib New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    985 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    FL
    the other factor people have to remember is ATi/AMD never said that the hd 2900 xt to be their high end card , it plays mid range in league of the GTS , the 1gb version is not official release by ATI/AMD , this was an option given to the partners if they wanted to do this , so sapphire and diamond did it , even so if this is just a mid range card and its scratching and fighting against the GTX/Ultra , that is quite impressive IMHO ......... I have been juggling b/e ati and nvidia forever n ever , and thats the fun thing about them one gets a better card prices go down and u get your moneys worth , i dont understand why people take it so personal when it comes to nvidia and Ati , if we did not have competition we wud be extortionized by just one company in a monopoly , just remember ATi has not released the XTX version of this card yet , and if the mid range is playing so close to the big guys , who knows what will happen , also even ATi released these cards so late , but there catalyst works amazingly good for such a short time to be so much MORE stable than Nvidia.

    i weigh out the goods n bads , not if its ATi or NVIDIA .....................
     
  13. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    This card can only go up against the GTX ( And lose ) due to the 232mb of ram it has MORE than the GTX....With 768 ram we would have even lower numbers in high resolutions.
    And i hope that ATI gets something faster but i doubt it since the difference between that and the X2900XT cant be more than 20-30% and the 8900 ( or 9xxx ) is only 3-4 months away so when will they launch it ? Not to mention we have no rumors for a better ATI card.
     
  14. Murasame

    Murasame New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    172 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    L.A.
    Very nice benches. Nice to see the 2900 keeps its own. Also must remember that ATI said they gave up some dx9 performance for dx10 performance.
     
  15. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Doesnt do really well in DX10 either....Still looses from the GTX and even the GTS in some DX10 games.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page