• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

High Res LCD

Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
2,116 (0.32/day)
System Name Not named
Processor Intel 8700k @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Assassin II
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz CL15
Video Card(s) Zotac 1080 Ti AMP EXTREME
Storage Samsung 960 PRO 512GB
Display(s) 24" Dell IPS 1920x1200
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Watt Fully Modular
I was wondering if anyone has seen any LCD monitors around 17-19' that have higher then the standard 1280x1024 res. And why is it that laptop LCD's can come in high res while i can't even find a regular high res LCD for a desktop without the screen size getting crazy big.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
2,489 (0.36/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Onus
Processor E8500 @ 3.95ghz ~1.25v
Motherboard ASUS P5E Deluxe
Cooling Scythe Orochi cpu, 5x 120mm Zalman red LED case fans, stock GPU coolers
Memory 8gb (4x2gb) G.Skill PC8000 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) 2x ASUS 3870x2s
Storage 4x160gb RAID 0 Main, 2x 500gb RAID 0 media storage.
Display(s) LG W2600H
Case Lian Li PC-A70B, painted black and other modded aspects :)
Audio Device(s) HT Omega Striker. Klipsch RF-3II fronts, Yamaha NS-A222 rears, Klipsch RC-3II center, Klipsch SUB12
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-750TX
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64, lots of games, photoshop n stuff.
17's and 19's do 1280x1024, you're going to have to poney up for a 20" for 1600x1200. My only guess as to why laptop LCDs to better is because if they made a small PC LCD that runs high resolution, that would be giving people what they want. And major corporations wouldn't want to do that, now would they?:laugh:
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.23/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
its the way they are made.. the native or highest resolution of an lcd monitor is actually the number if pixels that make up the screen matrix .. each pixel switches on and off..

to use a panel with more pixels would cost more money.. once u step outside the mainstream factor this means lots more money..

the average lcd is quite sharp enough as it is.. they dont really need more pixels.. they also only work at their best when all the pixels are in use.. when u pick a resolution lower than the native one the monitor has to play clever interpolation tricks.. in other words kinda merge several pixels into one to produce the lower resolution..

in windows this spoils the sharpness but in a game it dosnt seem to notice much..

anyways the answer to your question is money.. most folks dont want to spend any more than they have to.. and the wants of "most folks" dictate the product we get..

trog
 
Top