Anytime I see someone use the term "assualt Rifle" I know they really don't have a clue. That aren't even informed enough to be involved in the process of deciding what regulations to put in place. It's that simple. The labeling of a particular weapon based soley on its appearance is nothing more than an emotional tool to leverage the population. If I paint my rifle pink is it less threatening? Does that make it a non assault weapon? Maybe I should tie a stuffed toy to it too. The gadgets and accessories people like to put on their rifles should have no bearing on whether or not they can use them. You want a folding stock? Why not. You want a 36" sword on the end...go ahead... Just because it scares the uninformed non-gun using public is no excuse to prohibit any particular weapon. If and when someone uses a weapon...any weapon...to commit a crime serious jailtime and fines should be the result. As expensive as ammunition is the likelyhood of people lining up to buy 100 round drums for their AR-15 is slim. The people that want high capacity magazines should be able to have them in my opinion...they will soon lose the desire to use them after Paying $50-75 to fill them up... I can kill you just as dead with my single shot .22 rifle as I can with my 30 round .223. It only takes one shot to kill someone if you know what the hell you are doing...so what difference does the magazine capacity have to do with it?