1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HTML5 vs. Flash

Discussion in 'Programming & Webmastering' started by TheMailMan78, Jun 5, 2010.

  1. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,979 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,535
    I talked to a Apple tech this past week and I asked him "Why isn't Apple supporting Flash in their new products (ipad / iphone). He replied "Apple isn't bothering with Flash or Silverlight because its old tech and will be replaced with HTML5 very soon."

    Now this may be true but by the time the web switches over to HTML5 those very same Apple devices will be out of date IMO.

    With all that being said what do you guys think? Do you think HTML5 will replace (RIA) technologies like Flash? Or do you think they will evolve and not including them in your browser is a bad move.

    Just to be clear this is NOT a Apple bashing thread. I just would like to hear back from the community on the basic question. HTML5 vs. apps like Flash.
     
  2. Triprift

    Triprift

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,185 (2.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Location:
    Adelaide Australia
    I must admit im not a big fan of flash as it has great habit of crashing my browser and also i think its a resouce hog. If HTML5 can improve on that then im all for it.

    Also seen this earlier MailMan.
     
    TheMailMan78 says thanks.
  3. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,979 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,535
    Its funny because I have never had an issue with Flash. Honestly I thought Apple was banning flash because of whole Adobe not supprting 64-bit on OSX in CS4 and Lightroom vs Photoshop.
     
  4. Oliver_FF

    Oliver_FF New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    546 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Flash was developed a long time ago when HTML, Javascript and CSS were basic, slow and hard to use. Nowadays you can get the same functionality by using the technologies supported straight out of a web browser instead of having to rely on a third party plugin and development suite. What more needs to be said? :p

    Do a comparison yourself - two gaming websites one uses HTML one uses Flash.
    http://uk.pc.ign.com/ (HTML top banner)
    http://uk.gamespot.com/ (Flash top banner)
     
  5. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,979 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,535
    Um the flash is much nicer?
     
  6. Oliver_FF

    Oliver_FF New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    546 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    1. if I roll my mouse up and down over the news items my CPU usage hits 100%...
    2. you can't "open in new tab" any interesting articles
    3. the HTML page will load and work on -any- computer/device with a web browser
     
  7. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,979 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,535
    Mine doesnt go past 10%.
     
  8. Oliver_FF

    Oliver_FF New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    546 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    thats because whilst Flash is 'open' it is Adobe who develop the browser plugins - the Linux plugin is horribly inefficient. if you had a mobile device and wanted guarantee's that the end user experience is going to be awesome would you really want dependence on a third party? don't forget the efficiency of the plugin is going to directly impact things like battery life!
     
  9. lemode New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,304 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    263
    i spent the better part of a decade learning flash and its outdated...lol
     
    digibucc says thanks.
  10. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,553 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,493
    Location:
    IA, USA
    There was a falling out between Adobe (maker of Flash) and Apple. Apple is trying to push HTML5 instead (which isn't even official yet). HTML5 won't become via until at least 2012 (CPU Mag). The likelihood of something like Flash or Silverlight appearing in the final specifications are slim (too complex to implement on the browser level).

    Apple is basically spinning it so the public doesn't get pissed at them (they get pissed at Adobe instead).
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    everything uses flash, and apple is just being dumb about it.

    Really it really is like Apple saying HD-DVD is what everyone will end up using. When really it's Blue-Ray, and everyone already knows about it.

    Studios that have already spent massive amounts of money having their TV shows/Clips/Moives already converted into flash. Which workds on EVERYTHING, but the Iphone/Ipad.

    You really think that compaines are going to spend the small fourtune to convert them all? Yet, do you think Apple will do it for everyone for free?


    They need to open their eyes, and then move on with what everyone uses.
     
  12. regexorcist

    regexorcist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    178 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    ~/
    Adobe FLASH is old news and so is any proprietary
    format, used on the web, in this day and age.
    Open up or the market will use something else.

    Adobe was arrogant to keep FLASH closed as long
    as they did and not port it the BSD platform.
    The demise of FLASH is lonnngggg overdue.

    HTML5, canvas object, webGL, javascript, etc...
    This is the future!!! :D
     
  13. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,201 (5.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,558
    Location:
    Florida
    Why is flashes demise reliant on BSD? Far to little people even use that platform. Or know it exists.
     
  14. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    I think HTML5 with make video hosting much easier on the users. Since the code is embedded it is hosted on their end. This removes the need for specialized plugins or much overhead on your computer to view the video feed; however, I am not complete clear on all HTML5 is offering. Flash has one important feature that would need to be reproduced to kill it, interactivity. The fact their are complete games made in just flash that you can go online and play is a big deal. If you cannot do the same with HTML5, Flash will be around for a while.

    I personal never have any issues with Flash or its plugins, except that mess when I found out the IE/Windows Flash plugin is different from the Opera/Firefox/all other browsers plugin.

    I am curious to see what happens as Flash 11 should have hardware acceleration from the GPU. That will take the workload off the CPU and give them access to a massive amount of rendering power. Flash could evolve into something far, far more powerful, efficient, and desirable.
     
  15. regexorcist

    regexorcist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    178 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    ~/
    The demise of FLASH is long overdue, but it has nothing to do with BSD.

    Adobe was arrogant to ignore BSD when porting the the FLASH player.
     
  16. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    I like flash tbh. Apple should bite the bullet and go with flash. Eventually any problem with it will be fixed in time.
     
  17. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,201 (5.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,558
    Location:
    Florida
    i agree that HTML should be better than flash. but why was adobe arrogant to not port to BSD? BSD doesnt have that much weight.
     
  18. Bot

    Bot

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    584 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    i think HTML5 will be the true web2.0
    it will do and allow a lot more creativity for webpages and makes being creative easier.
    a lot of things about HTML5 were discussed at Google's I/O conf.

    i am not a fan of flash and even less so of apple. i could live with neither.
    adobe has long disappointed me by not supporting x64 bit and it's performance and reliability is very inconsistent. unless there is true improvement in the platform there is really no point to continuing with it.

    i hope HTML5 will be implemented a lot sooner then it is officially slated for.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2010
    Solaris17 says thanks.
  19. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,201 (5.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,558
    Location:
    Florida
    well said some of the tech demos etc are incredibly impressive it seems very flexible.
     
  20. regexorcist

    regexorcist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    178 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    ~/
    Adobe FLASH was very important and I feel it was an
    arrogant business decision to not put the resources needed
    into porting FLASH to BSD, because there are not that many users
    (or enough to matter). It has been requested for years.

    Similar to a big important cable company not running lines for high speed
    internet access into a rural area or location, because there
    aren't that many people, so why bother running all that line.
     
  21. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,553 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,493
    Location:
    IA, USA
    The inventor of the Internet said there's no web <version number>. The web is the web which is a conglomerate of many standards and protocols, each with their own iteration (HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0, CSS, HTTP, HTTPS, SSL, and virtually everything else that uses a custom socket protocol).

    Again, I stress that HTML5 spec is not finalized. It's pretty much guaranteed to have a video codec built in but it is undecided which one. It also has the canvas element as previously mentioned. Everything else is purely speculation.


    Remember, Adobe bought Flash thorugh Macrovision. Macrovision didn't support BSD so why would Adobe? There's far more potential users for 64-bit browsers than BSD. They supported neither.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    Well they did announce the video codec will support HD content now using something like the H.264 but open and free of licensing fees.
     
  23. twilyth Guest

    If you are a flash developer, does the sdk or whatever cost anything? If it does, I think you will see people develop and publish using html5 and then using a cheap utility to convert to flash for non-html5 compliant browsers.

    Apple is a whole other issue. With their censoring of magazine content for pubs that want to be available on the ipad, the ipad version has become know as the Iran edition. That should be enough to piss off even some of the Apple faithful.

    We'll see how it goes when the first wave of tablets comes out in a few months - with flash support and no censorship.
     
  24. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,553 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,493
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Crunching for Team TPU
  25. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-December/013152.html
    |
    V

    "we need a codec that is known to not require per-unit or per-distributor licensing, that is compatible with the open source development model, that is of sufficient quality as to be usable, and that is not an additional submarine patent risk for large companies."

    If this statement is true, H.264 is going to have to go because that is a licensed container that does not comply with open source development. I just thought that I read somewhere that H.264 was already off the table.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2010

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page