1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

I-O Data Intros BDXL-Capable Portable Blu-ray Burner

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 22, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,532 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Japanese company I-O Data unveiled its latest portable Blu-ray drive, the BRP-U6XE, which is capable of writing the new BDXL format, with disc capacities of up to 100 GB. Measuring 137 x 154 x 20 mm, the drive relies entirely on USB 2.0 for its connectivity. Its USB cable is built into it, and is retractable. Corel WinDVD BD3D and Nero Express Essentials come bundled.

    The drive is capable of burning single and double layer BD-R discs at 6X, triple and quadruple layer (BDXL) BD-R discs at 4X, BD-RE at 2X, DVD-R/+R and DVD+RW at 8X, DVD-R/+R double-layer and DVD-RW at 6X, DVD-RAM at 5X, CD-R at 24X, and CD-RW at 16X. Backed by a one-year warranty, the I-O Data BRP-U6XE is priced at about $233.

    [​IMG]

    Source: TechConnect Magazine
     
    Damn_Smooth says thanks.
  2. Redline582 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Talk about a bottleneck

    Writing up to 100GB and running it through only USB 2.0? Bad call in my book.
     
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,532 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    There's absolutely no optical drive that can get bottlenecked by USB 2.0. Because no optical disc standard has reached USB 2.0 bandwidth. The fastest optical disc is BD-R 12X, but even that is 432 Mbps.

    This drive burns BDXL at 4X. Blu-ray transfer rate at 4X speed is 144 Mbps. USB 2.0 bandwidth is 480 Mbps.

    So even if this drive used Thunderbolt, its speed would have been the same.
     
    Damn_Smooth says thanks.
  4. Redline582 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    My mistake, I missed the 4x for BDXL. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but USB never reaches it its theoretical transfer speed. The average seems to range around the mid 20's in MB/s.
     
  5. NickVs New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Technically, USB 2.0 barely exceeds 50% of its theoretical bandwidth of 480 Mbps, best results I've seen are about 40 MB/s (320 Mbps) and it's still really hard to achive, so BD-R 12X would require something better than that, like USB 3.0 for instance, especially considering power requirements of a full speed BD-R.
     
  6. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    A lot of new laptops come with USB 3, why no USB 3 . . .. . ?
     
  7. dr emulator (madmax)

    dr emulator (madmax)

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,241 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    176
    Location:
    the uk that's all you need to know ;)
    100gb discs faints n hits the deck with a  thud.gif

    but saddly 1 tiny scratch and it's :nutkick: and :banghead: time :shadedshu

    and what of the price of these multi-layered discs ? i bet they will be astronomical in price, and that i'll need a mortgage to buy 1 :twitch:
     
  8. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Yeah last time I looked at dual layer bluray it was about $14 -$24 each which is insane!
     
  9. Thefumigator

    Thefumigator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    412 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    58
    I own a rewritable 50GB bluray disc, I think it was 15$. And its rewritable, so its better than a pendrive in my case, backup purposes. Of course I also own it for the sake of owning one.

    What I found surprising is how slow it is recorded. i mean, I started the burn let's say 3pm and when I came back at 6pm the thing was still burning
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page