• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

I really hate the word "overkill"

Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
Here's why.

2 years ago i was building a new rig, asked everybody for what gpu should i go with for my budget and the resolution that i'm content using with (which is 1440x900). At that time, ever single person that i've asked for advice that, is GTX 670 will be future proof for my resolution at 900p for at least 4 years on ultra settings, folks said that a GTX 670 will be "overkill" for that resolution and i should get a gpu like 7850, which i ended up getting.

Once i finally built my system and using it with intense games like Metro 2033, Last Light and many more, i saw that it was not true at all, even a 7850 couldn't handle games at maxed settings on that resolution.

Anyway, i'm going to upgrade my GPU and was wondering should i get something like GTX 970 or going with something higher ?

I'll be using it with 1440x900.

So, here's the rest of my system at the moment.

I5 3470
8 GB Ram
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.63/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
But, but, but Overkill Software!

I wouldn't get a GTX 970 unless you plan on upgrading your screen in the near future. If you insist, I would go with GTX 970 or R9 290X. GTX 980 isn't worth the jump in price and integrated SLI/Crossfire I tend to avoid unless you're using ridiculous resolution or many monitors.
 
Last edited:

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
23,374 (3.76/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.VI
Processor Intel 8600k@Stock -- pending tuning
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling CPU: BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Memory 32GB XPG Gammix D10 {2x16GB}
Video Card(s) ASUS Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD SN770 (Gaming)|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300|2x 2TB Crucial BX500
Display(s) LG GP850-B
Case Corsair 760T (White)
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
grab a GTX 770. i wouldnt really go any higher than that unless you just want to spend money. 2x 660Ti's are also pretty good but those cards are a little harder to get now since they've been EOL for so long, but they will rip shit up for a 19" monitor.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
At that res, you are more cpu bound than gpu even with a 970...

Hate on overkill all you want... But my suggestion is to not upgrade your gpu every four years, but shrink it down to 2-3.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.65/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
People should not have spoken so boldly a couple of years ago when the new gen consoles hadn't been released. Now we know what kind of ports we will be getting and in general the performance required for the next couple of years anyway. I don't think you need a GTX 970 at your resolution but it couldn't hurt so if you want to spend some extra $$$ to feel more secure about the near future then go ahead.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
Maybe a 280x ? But i honestly don't believe that, a 280x couldn't max. a game like GTA V with AA and AF at 900p, am i wrong ?
 
Last edited:

Bow

Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
3,061 (0.53/day)
Location
South of Planet Earth
System Name SLOW-MO-SHUN III
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 7950X 4.5ghz 16 Core
Motherboard MSI MPG X670E Carbon wifi
Cooling Quench 360 Liquid Cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury Beast DDR 5-5200
Video Card(s) NVidia GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB GDDR6X
Storage 1TB Kingston NV2 M.2 SSD 2TB 2.5 SanDisk SSD Plus
Display(s) Asus 28" VP28UQG 4K 3840x2160
Case Athena M1, 6 Chassis Fans
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA Super Nova 1000W
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Razer Ornata
Software Windows 10 Home 64-Bit
Love the band :rockout::rockout::rockout::rockout::rockout:
:roll:
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.62/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10
... anything worth killing is worth overkilling :laugh:
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
911 (0.24/day)
System Name BlueKnight
Processor Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PH (rev. 1.0)
Memory 1x 4GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz (Kingston KVR13N9S8/4)
Video Card(s) Onboard
Storage 1x 160GB (Western Digital WD1600AAJS-75M0A0)
Display(s) 1x 20" 1600x900 (PHILIPS 200VW9FBJ/78)
Case μATX Case (Generic)
Power Supply 300W (Generic)
Software Debian GNU/Linux 8.7 (jessie)
Anyway, i'm going to upgrade my GPU and was wondering should i get something like GTX 970 or going with something higher ?
Buy the most powerful GPU you can afford. It is better to be "overkill" than too weak.

Just my opinion.
 

Toothless

Tech, Games, and TPU!
Supporter
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
9,277 (2.52/day)
Location
Washington, USA
System Name Veral
Processor 5950x
Motherboard MSI MEG x570 Ace
Cooling Corsair H150i RGB Elite
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill TridentZ
Video Card(s) Powercolor 7900XTX Red Devil
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 1TB, Samsung 980 1TB, Teamgroup MP34 4TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro XZ342CK Pbmiiphx + 2x AOC 2425W
Case Fractal Design Meshify Lite 2
Audio Device(s) Blue Yeti + SteelSeries Arctis 5 / Samsung HW-T550
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Corsair Nightsword
Keyboard Corsair K55
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Professional
Benchmark Scores PEBCAK
A 970 is "overkill" for the moment on that resolution, but not in the future..
 

Random Murderer

The Anti-Midas
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
6,974 (1.10/day)
Location
Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
System Name TOO MUCH RADIATOR! | The TV Box a.k.a. The Shoebox
Processor Core i7 4930K @ 4.5GHz | Core i5 6600K @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus X79 Rampage IV Extreme | Asus Z170i Pro Gaming
Cooling Custom water on CPU and GPU, dual 360mm radiators | Corsair H80i
Memory 4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX DDR3-1600 | 2x 4GB G.Skill RipJaws 4 DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD R9 295x2 | PowerColor AMD HD7970
Storage Samsung SSD 830 256GB, various others | 2x 1TB Seagate Barracudas in RAID1
Display(s) Dell U2713HM 2560x1440 IPS | Panasonic TC-L32E5 1080p IPS TV
Case Thermaltake Suppressor F51 (stripped down to hold two radiators) | Cooler Master Elite 130
Audio Device(s) RM-DAC -> Xiang Sheng 708b -> Sennheiser HD650 | HDMI sound device on 7970
Power Supply LEPA G1600-MA 1600W | Corsair CX750M 750W
Software Win 10 64
Benchmark Scores over 9000 BungholioMarks, "Bitchin' Fast"
At that res, you are more cpu bound than gpu even with a 970...
Completely agree with this. Either overclock that i5 or drop an i7 in, but at the resolution you use, you're CPU bound for sure. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if by upping the speed of that i5 you were able to raise some game settings and get the same framerate you are now. Also, not sure what people were thinking by recommending the 7850 over the 670...
 

Toothless

Tech, Games, and TPU!
Supporter
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
9,277 (2.52/day)
Location
Washington, USA
System Name Veral
Processor 5950x
Motherboard MSI MEG x570 Ace
Cooling Corsair H150i RGB Elite
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill TridentZ
Video Card(s) Powercolor 7900XTX Red Devil
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 1TB, Samsung 980 1TB, Teamgroup MP34 4TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro XZ342CK Pbmiiphx + 2x AOC 2425W
Case Fractal Design Meshify Lite 2
Audio Device(s) Blue Yeti + SteelSeries Arctis 5 / Samsung HW-T550
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Corsair Nightsword
Keyboard Corsair K55
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Professional
Benchmark Scores PEBCAK
As many have said but I can clear it up- The lower the resolution, the more CPU horsepower is needed and the higher the resolution, the more GPU power. It's kinda how people can get by on an overclocked Pentium when playing 1080p games.

Completely agree with this. Either overclock that i5 or drop an i7 in, but at the resolution you use, you're CPU bound for sure. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if by upping the speed of that i5 you were able to raise some game settings and get the same framerate you are now. Also, not sure what people were thinking by recommending the 7850 over the 670...
Locked i5. They're better off getting an unlocked i5 or locked i7 and getting a 970. I'm running my system specs rig on 1080p easily. Not maxing everything but eh.. Killing Floor looks pretty.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Get an unlocked i5 or i7. At lower resolutions as many others have stated, you'll be CPU bound. A new GPU isn't going to get you more performance if the weakest link is your CPU.

What you're describing as "overkill" is what I would call "the wrong tool for the wrong job". You need to figure out what your bottleneck is before railing on how people use certain terms because upgrading your GPU won't do you any good if your CPU can't handle it. This isn't an "overkill" problem, it's a "you don't understand the problem" problem.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
911 (0.24/day)
System Name BlueKnight
Processor Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PH (rev. 1.0)
Memory 1x 4GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz (Kingston KVR13N9S8/4)
Video Card(s) Onboard
Storage 1x 160GB (Western Digital WD1600AAJS-75M0A0)
Display(s) 1x 20" 1600x900 (PHILIPS 200VW9FBJ/78)
Case μATX Case (Generic)
Power Supply 300W (Generic)
Software Debian GNU/Linux 8.7 (jessie)
The lower the resolution, the more CPU horsepower is needed and the higher the resolution, the more GPU power.
Correct me if I am wrong, I am newbie at this...

The required CPU processing power wouldn't increase in such situation right?!

I mean, at a lower resolution the GPU will work less to achieve a certain frame rate while higher resolutions will require much more GPU power and a bit higher CPU processing power.
Considering the GPU work is limited by the monitor refresh rate and it will be easier to achieve that with less pixels.

is that correct or am I mistaken?!
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Correct me if I am wrong, I am newbie at this...

The required CPU processing power wouldn't increase in such situation right?!

I mean, at a lower resolution the GPU will work less to achieve a certain frame rate while higher resolutions will require much more GPU power and a bit higher CPU processing power.
Considering the GPU work is limited by the monitor refresh rate and it will be easier to achieve that with less pixels.

is that correct or am I mistaken?!
Nope, you completely understand that correctly. CPU becomes the bigger bottleneck as frame rates increase and lower resolutions enables the GPU to do less work for every frame making the CPU liable for more of the rendering time as well as the simple fact that the GPU is pumping out frames faster. Coordination becomes a bigger task which lies completely on the CPU.
 

Random Murderer

The Anti-Midas
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
6,974 (1.10/day)
Location
Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
System Name TOO MUCH RADIATOR! | The TV Box a.k.a. The Shoebox
Processor Core i7 4930K @ 4.5GHz | Core i5 6600K @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus X79 Rampage IV Extreme | Asus Z170i Pro Gaming
Cooling Custom water on CPU and GPU, dual 360mm radiators | Corsair H80i
Memory 4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX DDR3-1600 | 2x 4GB G.Skill RipJaws 4 DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD R9 295x2 | PowerColor AMD HD7970
Storage Samsung SSD 830 256GB, various others | 2x 1TB Seagate Barracudas in RAID1
Display(s) Dell U2713HM 2560x1440 IPS | Panasonic TC-L32E5 1080p IPS TV
Case Thermaltake Suppressor F51 (stripped down to hold two radiators) | Cooler Master Elite 130
Audio Device(s) RM-DAC -> Xiang Sheng 708b -> Sennheiser HD650 | HDMI sound device on 7970
Power Supply LEPA G1600-MA 1600W | Corsair CX750M 750W
Software Win 10 64
Benchmark Scores over 9000 BungholioMarks, "Bitchin' Fast"
Locked i5. They're better off getting an unlocked i5 or locked i7 and getting a 970. I'm running my system specs rig on 1080p easily. Not maxing everything but eh.. Killing Floor looks pretty.
Ah, didn't catch that it was locked.
Yeah, it seems either an unlocked i5 or an i7 is in order here. Either way, I'd grab an unlocked CPU anyway.
And while the 970 would be a huge upgrade with the new CPU, he might not need it once he upgrades the CPU, especially considering he's on a lower res than you and already has a more powerful GPU.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
Get an unlocked i5 or i7. At lower resolutions as many others have stated, you'll be CPU bound. A new GPU isn't going to get you more performance if the weakest link is your CPU.

What you're describing as "overkill" is what I would call "the wrong tool for the wrong job". You need to figure out what your bottleneck is before railing on how people use certain terms because upgrading your GPU won't do you any good if your CPU can't handle it. This isn't an "overkill" problem, it's a "you don't understand the problem" problem.

My I5 3470 is oc'd to 4.00Ghz (default: 3.20) it's really one of the best price/performance cpu out there. I think i'm still not "getting it" because i was sure as hell with 4.00 rate i thought i wouldn't have problems with cpu bottlenecking at 900p.

Maybe i should get some "unlocked i5 or i7" and try to beat the world record and reach 9.90 Ghz just to play at 900p, right ?

Also, not sure what people were thinking by recommending the 7850 over the 670...

Those wise guys thought it would be useless and called it "OVERKILL!!!!! OVERKILL!!" like a zombie hooked up to the wrong stuff.
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Maybe i should get some "unlocked i5 or i7" and try to beat the world record and reach 9.90 Ghz just to play at 900p, right ?
Those wise guys thought it would be useless and called it "OVERKILL!!!!! OVERKILL!!" like a zombie hooked up to the wrong stuff.
How about you stop acting like a child and mature up. If this is how you're going to talk to people this thread deserves to be locked.
 

Toothless

Tech, Games, and TPU!
Supporter
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
9,277 (2.52/day)
Location
Washington, USA
System Name Veral
Processor 5950x
Motherboard MSI MEG x570 Ace
Cooling Corsair H150i RGB Elite
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill TridentZ
Video Card(s) Powercolor 7900XTX Red Devil
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 1TB, Samsung 980 1TB, Teamgroup MP34 4TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro XZ342CK Pbmiiphx + 2x AOC 2425W
Case Fractal Design Meshify Lite 2
Audio Device(s) Blue Yeti + SteelSeries Arctis 5 / Samsung HW-T550
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Corsair Nightsword
Keyboard Corsair K55
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Professional
Benchmark Scores PEBCAK
My I5 3470 is oc'd to 4.00Ghz (default: 3.20) it's really one of the best price/performance cpu out there. I think i'm still not "getting it" because i was sure as hell with 4.00 rate i thought i wouldn't have problems with cpu bottlenecking at 900p.

Maybe i should get some "unlocked i5 or i7" and try to beat the world record and reach 9.90 Ghz just to play at 900p, right ?



Those wise guys thought it would be useless and called it "OVERKILL!!!!! OVERKILL!!" like a zombie hooked up to the wrong stuff.
Your resolution is too low to fully use your current GPU, what do you think a 970 will do?

As for the 9.9ghz comment; I smell frustration and ignorance. We're trying to explain things to you.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
Why get offended ?

I told it as it is.

Anyway enough with the drama.

So is 4.00Ghz not enough with GTX 970 or a lower tier card like 280x to run at max on 900p ? What can i do to achieve fully maxed out experience with AA and AF with a game like GTA 5 ?

As for the 9.9ghz comment; I smell frustration and ignorance. We're trying to explain things to you.

Brother, i'm saying that because i'm at 4.00Ghz and was shocked to hear that i needed to go even higher than that for a lousy 900p. Don't get it wrong.

Just trying to have a full exp. on 900p, peace.


By the way, i'm thanking everyone on this thread (check it) so no need to get upset guys :(
 
Last edited:

peche

Thermaltake fanboy
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Messages
6,709 (1.94/day)
Location
San Jose, Costa Rica
System Name Athenna
Processor intel i7 3770 *Dellided*
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Rev. 1.1
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 Pro + Tt Riing12 x2 / Tt ThunderBlade / Gelid Slim 120UV fans
Memory 16GB DRR3 Kingoston with Custom Tt spreaders + HyperX Fan
Video Card(s) GeForce GTX 980 4GB Nvidia Sample
Storage Crucial M4 SSD 64GB's / Seagate Barracuda 2TB / Seagate Barracuda 320GB's
Display(s) 22" LG FLATRON 1920 x 1280p
Case Thermaltake Commander G42 Window
Audio Device(s) On-board Dolby 5.1+ Kingston HyperX Cloud 1
Power Supply Themaltake TR2 700W 80plus bronce & APC Pro backup 1000Va
Mouse Tt eSports Level 10M Rev 1.0 Diamond Black & Tt Conkor "L" mouse pad
Keyboard Tt eSports KNUCKER
Software windows 10x64Pro
Benchmark Scores well I've fried a 775' P4 12 years ago, that counts?
Well, if you can afford the GTX 970 just do it, also if the money wont be a problem, get a GTX 980, you won't regret,

I don’t like AMD radeon so much… but you can also consider R9 290X , if I would have the chance to upgrade my card I would go for gigabyte G1 Gaming 980 4GB!

Having an asskicker Video Card its never an "Overkill" ...
regards.
 

Toothless

Tech, Games, and TPU!
Supporter
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
9,277 (2.52/day)
Location
Washington, USA
System Name Veral
Processor 5950x
Motherboard MSI MEG x570 Ace
Cooling Corsair H150i RGB Elite
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill TridentZ
Video Card(s) Powercolor 7900XTX Red Devil
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 1TB, Samsung 980 1TB, Teamgroup MP34 4TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro XZ342CK Pbmiiphx + 2x AOC 2425W
Case Fractal Design Meshify Lite 2
Audio Device(s) Blue Yeti + SteelSeries Arctis 5 / Samsung HW-T550
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Corsair Nightsword
Keyboard Corsair K55
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Professional
Benchmark Scores PEBCAK
If you're getting the 970, then get a 1080p monitor. It's probably the only way to actually use your GPU and not bottleneck due to your CPU.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
But i stated that i was content with 900p.

So it's basically impossible at 900p ?

(Thanks EarthDog :))
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Content I think is what you are looking for... :)

Grammar police aside :))), while you will likely see some increases in buying a new card, you wont get nearly what you should with having a proper monitor or an even higher overclock on the CPU.

Like others said, try pushing your CPU a bit more if you can and see if you can get more FPS out it.

If you go with a better card, I suggest you then go into the NVCP or CCC and override/add to the in game AA settings as that will put more work on the GPU and less on the CPU... to what end that will work though. No clue.
 
Top