1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

i7 870 vs. FX 8320

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Eric_Cartman, Sep 14, 2013.

  1. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    My friend is looking to upgrade.

    He currently has an i7 870 overclocked to 3.8GHz.

    He's looking at an FX 8320 which he hopes to clock to 4.4-4.6GHz with a H100.

    He has SLI GTX 660 Ti's and games on a 60" 1080p HDTV.

    Will the FX 8320 give a noticeable boost in performance?

    I tried googling for benchmarks but most don't compare the older i7 to the FX processors.

    So I couldn't really get an idea of how they compare.

    Also, his i7 870 is at its max for overclock.

    So don't suggest just overclocking that further.

    He bought the H100 in hopes of pushing the i7 further but it just isn't stable past 3.8GHz.

    No matter how high he sets the voltage it will not go any higher.

    I think his board is actually the limiting factor here.

    So since he has to replace the motherboard anyway he wants to upgrade to a more modern CPU at the same time.

    And good socket 1156 motherboards are impossible to find new.
     
  2. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Its not an upgrade going to an 8320 more of a sidegrade. Maybe at max clock it could be faster than an 870@3.8ghz, but it won't be much or noticeable in games for that matter.
     
  3. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,444 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    I'm sure the 8320 would be an improvement especially in multithreaded scenarios though not sure it would be night and day, you say will it give a noticeable improvement, in what? games? likely not, or not a very bog improvement anyway, video editing and other multithreaded tasks yes, quite noticeably.
     
  4. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/322/AMD_FX-Series_FX-8320_vs_Intel_Core_i7_i7-870.html
    http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-870-vs-AMD-FX-8320

    If you ask me, having already the i7 is not worth upgrading.
    Maybe trying to buy a core i7 4770 later is the best option
    and still if he has two 660, the i7 is not really a limit.
    I mean, what limits him there? Maybe a little bottleneck, not a major one
    If he does gaming, it is not worth it, but if he does video editing, then it will be worth it
    Just gather money for a better option
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2013
    AlienIsGOD says thanks.
  5. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,150 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    912
    I agree with the above. It's a side grade. You'll gain performance in some areas and lose performance in other areas. Not worth the hassle or money.

    If he wants to throw money around maybe the GPU or RAM area is a better focus.
     
  6. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,572 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    it will be a little bottlenecked by the cpu but i would agree its not worth making that as an "upgrade". i was watching sli 660 being held back by an i7 920 the other day so i cant see the 870 doing much better, even at 3.8ghz.

    if he must upgrade i would give some real hard thought to getting a 2nd hand sandy or ivy i7 myself as they are much better bang per buck and also much cooler running.
     
  7. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,051 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    808
    Location:
    Milky Way Galaxy
    I'm an AMD fan but I wouldn't bother upgrading/sidegrading to that CPU, if he really want's to upgrade I would go with a haswell setup :toast: i5 4670k, 8GB - 16GB RAM kit and a decent non overpriced Z87 mobo should do the trick & just keep the rest of the hardware :)
     
  8. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    There are other reasons he wants to upgrade.

    Yes, gaming is his main priority, but he also does video editing.

    But he really wants USB3 and SATA3.

    It is hard to believe that AMD is that far behind.

    The 870 is 4 years old and AMD still hasn't caught up to it?

    Is it just a matter of games being mostly single threaded and Intel is really good at single threaded apps while the AMD is better at multithreaded due to the 8 physical cores?
     
  9. Absolution

    Absolution

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    273 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Go for the Intel build. AM3+ socket's future doesnt look too bright atm.
     
  10. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    The 8320 with an overclock will beat a clocked 870 depending on the scenario. It is better at multithreading no ifs ands or buts. Single threaded ipc just isn't on par.

    Terrible reason all intel sockets are dead end the op is dealing with that right now on lga1156.
     
    tacosRcool says thanks.
  11. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,837 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,533
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    All sockets are dead...eventually. Why anyone wants to hang onto the same motherboard for 3-5 CPU generations is beyond me. :rolleyes:

    On topic, as others mentioned this upgrade will probably just be a sidegrade. If your friend wants the best gaming performance and/or high efficiency then I would get a 4770K or even one of the new Ivy-E chips if they have a lot of $$$ to put into this and don't mind a new socket replacing that platform late next year.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  12. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,926 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    470
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    motherboards have expansion slots for a reason...If he wants USB 3 and SATA 3 he could just buy cards to do just that...seriously tho...just like your PCI-E slot those other slots are fairly useful.
     
  13. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,614 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,230
    Exactly. And for what is would he use eSTATA3? No HDD can reach those speeds anyway.

    http://www.caldigit.com/fasta-6gu3/

    Something like that. There are extremely cheap ones on ebay but I don't know how those perform.
     
  14. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    Expansion cards are ugly.

    USB3 cards require an extra power cable.

    And SATA3 cards require extra drives before Windows will pick them up.

    And booting from them can be a pain.

    Since he plans to get an SSD for his OS easy booting and installing Windows is important.
     
  15. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Z79 if he is doing video editing. The people who started off with 1366 are still rocking on with their i7 970, beating almost everything including 4770K in multithreaded programs. 3930K will last at least as long, if not longer. Also, all the rams :D
     
  16. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    tell your friend wait for ddr4
     
  17. Aaron95

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    19 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I don't know why people seem to hate AMD so much..

    When the FX 8320 came out it was considered a rival for the i5 2500k, the i7 3770k is commonly put up against it and the AMD falls short all across the board, but not that far..
    Unfortunately for AMD the prices made Intel the clear winner, but things have changed. Now assuming you don't wait for ddr4 or the next gen CPUs (I have read its no far away ut not certain..) then you should absolutely go the AMD

    i7 920 passmark: 5024 (out of interest, mine and a common 1366 CPU)
    i7 870 passmark: 5433
    FX8320 passmark: 8175 cost: $189
    i7 3770K passmark: 9581 cost: $379

    "Its not an upgrade going to an 8320 more of a sidegrade." Yeah rightio mate.

    These are my own current costs if I were to purchase the CPU now, no bias. As I said when the CPUs were released intel won hands down, not now. Also the scores are base brobably using all cores to max, but AMD is the obvious choice to me.

    Yeah AMD isnt so good at single threaded apps, what serious game cant handle at least dual cores??

    In all honesty however, it's probably not worth an upgrade at the moment.
     
  18. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Starcraft II struggles on any AMD processor, and that is the most serious game I can think of. There may potentially be others like Battlefield 3 which struggles on AMD.
     
    RCoon says thanks.
  19. Schmuckley

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Messages:
    41 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    I don't see any point to that.IPC is higher with Lynnfield...has hyperthreading, no?
    no..no point.

    This is a point in time when new x79 cpus are available...
     
  20. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    BF3 plays fine on amd...
     
    Damn_Smooth, Zubasa, Lionheart and 3 others say thanks.
  21. Aaron95

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    19 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    perhaps you forgot to read my whole post before immediately dissing AMD, the CURRENT price/performance ratio favors AMD.
    I found some reviews, one in particular I will use for an example:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1669746/8320-good-gaming.html

    now diving the performance of each CPU by their respectable prices, the result for price/performance ratio is as follows: (using starcraft II)

    i7 3770K: 0.1897
    FX8320: 0.2381

    So you're telling me at its absolute worst AMD performs 1.255 times better than intel (right now). Thanks so much for proving my point!! :)

    Keep in mind these are current prices i'm using, AMD's CPUs have dropped in value considerably, therefore I cannot say the same for future generations, however right now is the time to go AMD assuming you upgrade now and don't wait for the next gen Intels.
     
    Dent1 says thanks.
  22. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,150 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    912
    So explain why 4 year old Athlon II X4 gets about 80FPS in StarCraft II and plays BF3 online with 64 players on ultra settings without hiccup?
     
    tacosRcool says thanks.
  23. d1nky

    d1nky

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,707 (6.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,281
    graphic cards.....
     
    RCoon and Dent1 say thanks.
  24. Aaron95

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    19 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    have you never heard of 'bottleneck'?

    Last time i checked graphics cards improve graphics capabilities, not the CPU's :)
    Doesn't matter how good your graphics card is, the Athlon won't magically go faster.
     
  25. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,572 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    no aaron it wont, but a faster cpu will stop the gpu from starving of data and the fx8 will not feed the gpu anymore data than the old i7 would.

    really, a 2nd hand 25 or 2600k is the best bet.
     
    d1nky and RCoon say thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page