1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

IBM Faces Monopoly and Anti-Competition Charges

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 21, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,381 (11.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,608
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    IBM has been accused of monopoly and anti-competition practices with the mainframe market. A complaint of the same has been filed with the European Commission on Tuesday. T3, a small American supplier of mainframes who, in the past, dealt in IBM products, alleges the company the company to have abused its market-position and monopoly power in the industry.

    IBM is accused of engaging in several anti-competitive offenses, that include the prevention of the sales of competing mainframe hardware products by making its operating system exclusive to its mainframe hardware. IBM is further accused of withholding patent licenses and certain intellectual property to the detriment of mainframe customers, according to a statement by T3. In the same statement, T3 says that it dealt with IBM mainframes in the past, but it took to selling its own products developed by Amdahl (now part of Fujitsu). An IBM spokesperson responded saying that the company is yet to see a complaint, and that it was inappropriate to comment on specifics relating thereto.

    Source: ZDNet
  2. infrared New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,307 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Location:
    Southampton, UK
    *sigh* not another law-suit.

    Although I suppose there is a case here, only allowing your software to run on your own hardware. Even apple have grown out of that!
  3. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    I swear... IBM's left-hand doesn't know what it's right-hand is doing.

    On one side, they're incredibly supportive of free and open-source philosophy, even releasing their latest Desktop suite, Symphony, free on both Windows and Ubuntu (they even made a .DEB file for installing it directly on Ubuntu). They've always been a big supporter of Linux on the server-side, too. But they can be awfully closed-up about certain matters, even to the point of hurting themselves.
  4. Weer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,417 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    New York / Israel
    Maybe one hand has gone rogue and is punching and hurting the company while the other.. makes it happy.
  5. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,101 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    Who are these people? Jobless retards?
  6. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,186 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,137
    Yes, lets take OS/400 the most stable OS inthe world, and allow people to find exploits, and render the 4+ years a good tech will have gone to school obsolete.

    Now instead of a serious OS and server system that is stable enough to run in hospitals, airports, and other system that are, ohh, slightly critical for the world, lets allow some jerkoff to make a virus for it by forcing IBM to release certain parts of the code. So those 4' of books that you have to read, understand and memorise as just the basic part of the training are now going to be added to by another foot about new security procedures.

    Good job.
    Darkrealms, cdawall and infrared say thanks.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  7. PCpraiser100 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Dammit, I think I found the common death of a company...bankrupt from lawyers:banghead:
  8. wahdangun

    wahdangun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,512 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    Location:
    indonesia ku tercinta
    yet, another small company want to make big money

    doesn't apple do this for year's
  9. Error 404

    Error 404 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,777 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    169
    Location:
    South Australia
    Votekick: European Commision.

    They're leading the front of attack on most larger companies nowadays. :shadedshu
  10. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    yep and look at them now.
  11. infrared New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,307 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Location:
    Southampton, UK
    Thanks steevo, I didn't think about it that way.
  12. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,668 (7.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,980
    Location:
    some AF base
    very good way of putting it. might not have been what they were aiming for but i'm sure the lawyers will put up a similar argument.

    along the lines of this OS is not hack proof so if i wree to let the how-to of it working get out to other manuf it could leek how it works and then someone has control of 90% of the most important services in the US/the rest of the world
  13. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
    LOL IBM FTW...

    I LOVE IBM... A big company that does a lot of good and doesn't push people around.
  14. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    woah woah woah, there are still mainframes in use??? How is this even an issue?? Does IBM even support mainframes anymore?? (probably a dumb question)
  15. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
    It's what they have always done, and they are the best at it...
    And yes mainframes will always be used, although the sizes will probably shrink slowly over time.

    This whole mumbo jumbo about how your mini frame can out compute a mainframe doesn't mean much.. Mainframes are not about processing power.
  16. Woody112

    Woody112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    562 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Florida
    Some how after seeing what the EU is doing to Microsoft I have a feeling that the EU has their hands in on this one.
    One hand in microsofts pocket and the other in IBM's:shadedshu:shadedshu:shadedshu
  17. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,186 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,137
    Yes, and this is the majority of their $$$$$


    http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/i/


    Every major corporation, goverment, school, hospital, airport, etc.... uses IBM hardware and software. So far as it being hack proof, no, it isn't. But it is the ONLY Operating System be certifed by the US goverment for high security data containment.


    After reading most of the books we have for ours, litarally 4 feet tall, I understand the system to use a hardware layer virtual job, print, data, user que except the SYSOP/SECOF, and those are still limited to protection IBM put in place to prevent unauthourised access and changes.


    They are by far more stable than any OS/hardware, more reliable, faster, more multi user supportive, printers.......


    Imagine having millions of complex records, hundreds of printers, thousands of users, and that just scratches the surface. Ours, a very humble 220 model, handles all payroll, taxes, parts inventory for two stores with multiple vendors, equipment inventory for two stores multiple vendors, accounts reciavable, accounts payable, 7 printers at both locations, 30 users with 3-5 sessions each, vendor communications, backups, all sorts of reports it can print in short order, and it has all of 512MB of RAM and 24GB of RAID 1 storage. In the current configuration it can handle up to 70 users.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  18. ascstinger

    ascstinger New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    544 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    76
    Location:
    In a house
    rofl.. wait just one moment here. How is refusing to sell your os to a different manufacturer ant-competitive. and if the customer doesn't want the ibm os, there seems to be at least 1 other manufacturer that they can take their money to. Something tells me T3 is just too lazy to develop their own software, or their software dept sucks.

    the hell with the EU, what exactly do they do besides create bullshit lawsuits
  19. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,217 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    exactly their reason for being, to create bullshit lawsuits thus try to fatten their wallets and also their lobbyists., thank god i dont live there :rockout:
  20. Darkrealms

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    851 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks for the good points and "inside" experiences. We are using IBM servers but obviously on the Windows Server platforms.

    I think if IBM developed it and IBM wants to sell thier package let them . . . There are soo many companies out there that use other products and other OS'.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page