1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Implications of PS4

Discussion in 'Games' started by bpgt64, Apr 8, 2013.

  1. bpgt64

    bpgt64

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,460 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    193
    Location:
    ATL, GA
    The two biggest things I have gotten out of the PS4 announcement are positives for PC gamers.

    1st. PS4 is an x86 based system, will likely be very easy to port games from PS4 to PC, if not simultanously release them.

    2nd. AMD has all 3 consoles for GPU hardware, potentially meaning games will be developed strongly around utilizing this architecture.

    3rd. Nvidia, is still pushing PhysX, on AMD hardware(granting it is probably CPU based). But that means there's a possibility of AMD hardware based support.

    I miss anything?
     
  2. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    nVidia will probably be using CPU physics on PS4, they will probably finally update it so it is running newer instruction sets than the ancient x87 they were suing. That will be a bonus for PC gamers if PhysX is your cup of tea.
     
  3. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,105 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    305
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Iirc there is no technical reason Physx cannot run on AMD GPU's.
    Also, judging by benchies from ClBenchmark, physics calculations might actually run faster on AMD hardware compared to their own. This is just speculation ofc.
     
  4. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,371 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    409
    Borderlands 2 looks amazing with Physics set on high with my AMD card :)
    I could certainly get used to more games utilizing physics. The effects are nice.
     
  5. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,672 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,036
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    I think the inclusion of Physx might be a good thing. At the same time, I want to see Sony actually deliver on their promises. I think the more interesting components of the PS4 are:

    8GB non video RAM.
    Multiple x86 based cores.

    The former makes 512 MB seem like the nightmare it was. This gives people a reason to program for a 64 bit OS, unlike the current 32 bit limited games.
    The later means truly multi-core optimized game. The requirement to use more cores (in a non-arcane architecture, I'm looking at you Cell) for better performance will mean that 3570 will finally be put to good use.
     
  6. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,559 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    I wouldn't give a second thought to physx. Tomb Raider was signaling how things will be done from here out, compute physics as it always should have been since DX11 hit. That should be the preference on next gen consoles.
     
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  7. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,968 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,807
    Location:
    IA, USA
    PhysX is only still around because NVIDIA refuses to let it die. Open standards for physics processing is the future, not closed source, proprietary systems. If developers want closed source, use Havok--functions great without the hardware constraints.


    PS4 is OpenGL where the next Xbox is DirectX (likely a derivative of 11). Xbox also uses XInput, DirectSound, and other DirectX technologies making porting to Windows easy. PS4 being so much like Xbox really only serves to make porting between the two consoles easier. Wii U is the odd one out; just like the Wii, only Nintendo can turn a huge profit on it.

    I think the market for the 8th generation will look very similar to the 7th generation. The only thing I see being different is the Wii U won't have run away sales like the Wii did.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. Guitarrassdeamor

    Guitarrassdeamor

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,071 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    307
    Location:
    NC
    It's gonna make everything a lot better as far as PC to PS3 or PS3 to PC porting, IMO. Honestly I can't wait, I hardly play my PS3 anymore but will get a PS4 just because.
     
  9. Chryonn

    Chryonn

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,035 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    100
    Location:
    London, England
    better start investing in that BD-Drive chaps, i hear the next generation XBox is going to have one too, which means more games WILL be published on BD.
     
  10. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,669 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,880
    Hmm. Isn't a good portion of porting to linux about making the game opengl? If so, the closeness of the ps4 to pc architecture + open gl make porting to linux much much easier.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,013 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,880
    PS3 is NOT OpenGL, it uses an API called libGCM. Closer to hardware, but conceptually it's not much different to OpenGL or D3D
     
    TRWOV, 1Kurgan1 and FordGT90Concept say thanks.
  12. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,413 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Yeh you missed two points derr 3

    1, a reason for starting this thread weeks after the ps4 showcase and its thread

    2 ,4 -8 gameing system types using amd gpu not 3

    3 , with all these gameing arenas covered or cornered by amd direct x could become erelivant as amd hinted at a year ago, why use an api when you could bare metal code for more performance
     
    More than 25k PPD
  13. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,968 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,807
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I don't think there will be a market for BD games. BD-ROM drives still don't have very good proliferation in the computer market. I think the ridiculously huge games are going to be increasingly delivered via the internet.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,332 (4.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,374
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Exactly this. There is no reason to push Blu-rays on PC owners. The revitalization of PC gaming has been the digital platform, and I only see that continuing to be the trend.

    As far as I know, NV actually pays companies to use Physx on their games. And those are really the only games running it, they refuse to let it die because they made an investment on it a long time ago, sucks but thats how it is, we've seen Havok work just as well without the hardware requirement, but money talks so Physx gets used.
     
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  15. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,175 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    It's the other way around. Physix is "100% free for both commercial and non-commercial use on Windows PC". Commercial use has a catch though.. It is free as long as they make less than $100K in gross revenue.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/physx-downloads
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page