1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Announces Three LGA 775 Processors, Cuts Prices of Some Chips

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 19, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,368 (11.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,607
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel is continuing to keep its lineup of socket LGA 775 processors developing. The company just introduced three new models: Core 2 Quad Q9500, Pentium E6600, and Celeron E3400. The Q9500 quad-core chip runs at 2.83 GHz, with an FSB speed of 1333 MHz much like the Q9550, except that it has 6 MB of total L2 cache instead of 12 MB on the Q9550. It is priced at US $183. Next, the Pentium E6600 dual-core chip runs at 3.06 GHz with an FSB speed of 1066 MHz. It is based on the 45 nm Wolfdale-2M core, and has 2 MB of L2 cache. This chip is priced at $84. Lastly, there's the Celeron E3400, with an operating frequency of 2.60 GHz, FSB speed of 800 MHz, and L2 cache size of 1 MB. This one goes for $53.

    In addition to releasing these chips, Intel reduced prices of some existing ones. The Pentium E6500 is now priced at $74, down from $84, Pentium E5400 at $64, down from $74, and Celeron E3300 to $43 from $53. All prices mentioned are for 1000-unit tray quantities per piece. The new processors are intended to keep the upgrade path within a price-range alive, and to help clear inventories of socket LGA 775 motherboards.

    Source: TechConnect Magazine
    skylamer says thanks.
  2. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,914 (4.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,979
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    I'm really suprised after the release of 1156 that Intel is still reeleasing new s775 chips. It's good to see them not completely abandoning the platform.
  3. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,124 (11.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,459
    strategic thinking on intels part.

    Release higher clocked CPU's with less overall performance, so that all new systems are based on these - and thus, widening the performance gap to the i5/i7 platforms
  4. Roph

    Roph

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    377 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Intel needs to get out a 775 quad closer to $100. Would be closer to AMD's $100 Athlon X4.
    El_Mayo says thanks.
  5. theubersmurf

    theubersmurf

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    870 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101
    Location:
    Dawn
    I'm sort of surprised, I was expecting the next time LGA 775 came up in the news to be to announce EOL for a collection of processors. Maybe Mussels is right though, trying to make the socket less appealing, or simply make options for LGA 775 suck, so the only option is a platform upgrade.
  6. Inioch

    Inioch

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    567 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
    Location:
    Finland
    How much difference is there really between 6M and 12M cache? Are C2Q's so cache dependent in performance?
  7. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,477 (3.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,140
    Why would they name a new cpu e6600?
  8. newfellow New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    314 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Intel needs to give me couple Q9650 to burn dirty cheap thanks.
  9. Lipton

    Lipton

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    68 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    To my understanding this is a "Pentium E6600" whereas the previous one was "Core 2 Duo E6600."
    Frick says thanks.
  10. assaulter_99

    assaulter_99

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,792 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    277
    Ha! I was so surprised that I thought this thread must have been from 2 years ago! Anyways, they may be the last ones.
  11. PP Mguire

    PP Mguire New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,005 (2.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    453
    Location:
    Venus, Texas
    Probably just rebranding stuff trying to make a quick buck on the people that dont know any better and OEMs.
  12. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,651 (3.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,765
    Location:
    Chicago
    Hell yes, especially as I'm not abandoning it myself anytime soon :)
  13. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    my 775 q6600 is here for at least a next 18 mths
  14. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Bravo Intel and well done on supporting multiple platforms still. Nice to see them keeping respect for their customers.
  15. skylamer

    skylamer

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    they go with 775 because many people have thhhhheese bmotherbaords



    (LAIK ME)
  16. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    they'd ratehr u buy a 775 proc instead of switch out to amd
  17. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,801 (6.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,919
    Damn, I was hoping for the sub-$100 Q7000 series to make its debut...

    Ummm...the entire CPU industry is rebranded stuff...
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  18. theorw

    theorw New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    771 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Athens GREECE
    i might get that quad.....
  19. mlee49

    mlee49

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    8,477 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,103
    Makes my e5200 practically worthless.

    What a crappy chip the Q9500 is. Nearly no L2 cache, but wonder how it could clock.
  20. SystemViper

    SystemViper

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,500 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    472
    it's amazing all the chips that intel has, they have so many monsters.
    For most everyday use you can easily get by with a E8400 and rock any programs, i hope the programming catches up with all the cores soon,..... :rockout:
  21. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,801 (6.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,919
    The 6MB of cache doesn't really hurt, the ones with 4MB of cache(Q8000 series) were the really crippled chips.

    The Quads with 6MB of cache, are just two E7000 chips stuck together. The E7000 series is actually still very respectable performance wise.

    The Quads with 4MB of cache, are just two E5000 chips stuck together.

    Though I though the Q9500 already existed, but was called the Q9505...
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  22. theorw

    theorw New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    771 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Athens GREECE
    i think this quad will be a nice upgrade from my semi-stable q6600@3,6 aint it?
    Especially in the OC potential...Dont u think?
    i mean q9500@4,0-4,2 6MB would perform quite better than q6600@3,5 8MB RIGHT?
  23. Konceptz

    Konceptz

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    151 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Richmond,VA

    media intensive apps (encoding and so forth) will suffer the most from the reduced cache, however the difference is marginal at best.
  24. PP Mguire

    PP Mguire New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,005 (2.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    453
    Location:
    Venus, Texas
    I was making more of a comment towards how people bash Nvidia for their rebranding to sell stock but yet Intel can do it with praise :confused:
  25. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,801 (6.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,919
    Ahhh...

    I think the problem is that most people think the nVidia products really are identical, when in reality we have only really seen 2 true rebrands from nVidia.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page