1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Atom "Rangeley" Enterprise Processors Detailed

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 21, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,451 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,621
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel's known lineup of low-power Atom processors based on the "Silvermont" micro-architecture spans across the "ValleyView" line of chips for tablets, nettops, and embedded systems, "Avoton" line for micro-servers, and a third line that completes the triad, "Rangeley." Designed for the networking and communications market, such as high-density switches, internet- and telephone-exchanges, etc., these chips are the first Atom-branded products to pack up to eight x86 CPU cores.

    The eight-core chips are built into a single-chip SoC design. The cores feature out-of-order execution, much like "Avoton," CPU clock speeds of up to 2.40 GHz, and an instruction-set that's carefully measured for Rengeley's target application, which includes SSE4.1/SSE4.2, AES acceleration, VT-x, and x86-64. Rangeley is also among the first Atom chips to feature a dual-channel DDR3 integrated memory controller, supporting DDR3-1600 MHz, blurring the lines between it and other Intel processors. Thanks to out-of-order execution, the chip gains a 35 percent performance increment over previous-generation "Saltwell" architecture. Since it's an SoC, its core-logic is completely integrated into the CPU package. Connectivity includes PCI-Express 2.0 (a total of 16 lanes spread across 4 ports), two SATA 6 Gb/s ports, gigabit Ethernet MAC, and legacy I/O.

    Source: CPU World
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,451 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,621
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Many Thanks to NHKS for the tip.
  3. NinkobEi

    NinkobEi

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,045 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Depending on its Battery Life, this thing sounds like it could take on the Tegra 4. I just hope it's not too expensive!
  4. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Cool! If these are reasonably priced, that could be a fun setup to play around with :toast:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. bencrutz

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    173 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    "Designed for the networking and communications market, such as high-density switches, internet- and telephone-exchanges, etc."

    i would assume a different target market
  6. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,247 (2.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    Great CPU for a mini webserver.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page