1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Co-Founder Says Company Should Build Car Batteries

Discussion in 'News' started by Polaris573, Dec 14, 2008.

  1. Polaris573

    Polaris573 Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,281 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Location:
    Little Rock, USA
    Former Intel CEO and Co-Founder Andy Grove has an interesting proposition for his former company. He believes that the emerging market for plug-in electric vehicles and hybrids presents a major business opportunity for Intel to become a leading manufacturer of advanced batteries. While Mr. Grove retired in 2005 he still serves as an advisor to Intel’s leadership, including CEO Paul Otellini. This would mark a major divergence from Intel’s current business model, as it would be unlikely much of their current research could be applied to such a drastically different product. In the early 2000s, Intel tinkered with producing consumer electronics, but the idea was shelved after a short time. More recently, Intel has abandoned business units that did not closely relate to its chip business. There is no doubt that the potential exists for advanced batteries to be a highly lucrative product as the public becomes ever more aware of environmental concerns and automotive manufacturers begin to design more electric and hybrid vehicles. One of the main obstacles for GM’s Chevy Volt program is the lack of advanced battery technology to power it for a reasonable amount of time. Even though it would require creation of new departments from the ground-up Intel’s financial resources make it a possible, although currently improbable, business venture. Currently there is no word from Paul Otellini on whether Intel is actively considering Grove’s advice.

    Source: TG Daily
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2008
  2. KBD New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,477 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    279
    Location:
    The Rotten Big Apple
    i think mr. grove is right about car batteries being in demand in the near future but i'm not certain if it should be up to intel to start making them. There are other companies out there that would be more suitable for it. If intel were to get into this business it would take away from its main goal of making CPUs, chipsets and other stuff. I guess if they do it and actually divert resourses towards this may be their CPU business will suffer and that will give AMD a chance to catch up.
     
  3. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    194
    Location:
    US
    that dude is so right!
     
  4. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,112 (2.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    Yes but he isn't telling intel to do it for the better of US, more like to better intel. By the way AMD is doing just fine on catching up. Checked the PII 6.0Ghz OC lately?
     
  5. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (2.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    soon you will be overclocking your mustang GT...
     
  6. kysg New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Pacoima, CA
    LOL to that, I just OC'd my mustang from 320 hp to 400hp....granted this is an off the wall comment.
     
  7. Mark_Hardware

    Mark_Hardware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    273 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    Location:
    Az
    Hmm seems like it would be one more step in making intel a superpower.... Some might say they have too much power now. Didn't you ever watch "Antitrust"?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2008
  8. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,921 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    They will be knocked off their high horse soon enough.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2008
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,568 (11.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel is diversifying in the right fields. Their SSDs are a tad expensive though.
     
  10. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    Now what makes you say that?

    Anyway Intel going in this direction is definately a plus. Intel has such a large and highly skilled workforce, and it wouldnt be hard for them to expand into other areas. They do have many engineers/scientists, and processors and batteries are around the same field; in terms of chemistry and manufacturing processes. I'd really love for the end of petrol cars (actually end of everything that utilises fossil fuels) and the mass adoption of electric powered vehicles, but the limiting factor is the endless greed that oil/fossil fuel companies have, as well as their overwhelming influence.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2008
  11. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,208 (5.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,567
    Location:
    Florida
    Intel=Umbrella Corp.
     
  12. kysg New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Pacoima, CA
    unfortunately Intel would have to have to have a pharmaceutical branch.
     
  13. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,208 (5.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,567
    Location:
    Florida
    idk procs to car batteries...pharmaceutical's arent something id put them past at this point.
     
  14. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,603 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    368
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    lol, though to just think of what in the distant future this company will be doing, dout it'll still be just CPU's in 40 years, shit i'll 57:eek: haha
     
  15. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,208 (5.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,567
    Location:
    Florida
    lol ill be 60 and me and you will be pumping oil somware praying for sarah conner
     
  16. kysg New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Pacoima, CA
    be kinda wierd though... but I dunno most companies have some type of awkward hidden agenda. Hmmm 60...why does that sound off meh probably just me.
     
  17. imperialreign

    imperialreign New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,043 (2.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha


    to be fair - many "major" battery companies that have gone into the automotive battery market fail . . . their products aren't as reliable, are overpriced - the only thing that sells them is their name.

    I've replaced more Energizer automotive batteries than I have any other brand, including the no-name el-cheapo stuff sold at some parts stores and Wal-Mart. Auto batteries, although similar to household batteries in theory, design and method of use, are a completely different breed - having to be able to withstand some of the harshest operational environments, as well as climatic and environmental factors.

    Batteries used in hybrids are even more peculiar, and require completely different materials for the extreme loads and extended reliability required of them - while still being able to withstand the same that the typical auto battery must endure.


    I'm not saying Intel couldn't pull it off, but the odds are very much against them.
     
  18. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,208 (5.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,567
    Location:
    Florida
    dk he said 40 years and im 20 4+2=6x10=60 i will be 60
     
  19. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,571 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,506
    Location:
    IA, USA
    There is no doubt that the need is there for better batteries for a wide variety of products (laptops, even) but, I somehow doubt that Intel has the expertise necessary to make it happen. It would be great for them to try but I certainly don't have my hopes up that they would be the ones to succeed.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    AMD isn't making car batteries, intel can't follow, buried. LOL
     
  21. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Better have some LN2 or you're still going to be slow :laugh:
     
  22. insider Guest

    The progress in battery technology is almost non existent over the last few decades, its about time someone came up with something that lasts a lot longer between charges and one that still holds charge of over 85% of its maximum capacity even after 3 years of use!

    The current batteries for laptops for example only lasts around a year before they are completely useless at holding any charge for any reasonable period, the likes of Dell charge an ass raping £80 for laptop batteries!!!
     
  23. KBD New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,477 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    279
    Location:
    The Rotten Big Apple
    yea, of course, and i'm happy to see that kind of overclock. but AMD is still behind 2 generations right now, when Phenom 2 comes out it will be one generation. Intel is going to have new 32nm CPUs in Q4 09 or Q1 10 and then they will be behind again 2 generations. AM3 will not be taking off until Q2 of 09 so you see what i mean. I'm hoping they are working on something like a new architecture to be released soon but according to their own statements it wont be around until 2011 which is very very late.
     
  24. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    You know they would be the best of the best if they did this. Just think they build there OWN chips. SO they could make a sever farm like no tomorrow. A straight up supercomputer that no one in the world could pay for. They could, because all they would be paying for the the material cost then take the benefit of what they made.

    Honetly the chips don't cost that much to make. It's the deportment time they are paying for I belive. So they could just make their money in the commercial market like normal, and take a chunk out of the returns to just build the worlds biggest supercomputer that could come up with things that you and me could never dream of.
     
  25. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,571 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,506
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I'm afraid a supercomputer wouldn't help much. New battery technology requires a lot of materials research which means getting your hands dirty mixing every single kind of metal that shows potential for storing electricity. That's why I think they don't have the expertise necessary. They'd be starting out as infants in a field with a lot of teens. XD
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page