1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Benchmarked

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Jan 20, 2008.

  1. rhythmeister New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    987 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
    We use full stops here :laugh:
     
    marsey99 says thanks.
  2. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,936 (5.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Ohio
    Wait, so these 45nm chips are hyperthreaded? Are they "true" quads too?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,588 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    299
    i thought we all use a comma to seperate every thousand???

    3,000,000,000,000,000so on and so......

    i think the pic has been edited in some form or other because if you look at each line it is as if there are a few pixles missing of the bottom of the text.

    man i want a q9300 now tho :p

    edit

    pmslmao
     
  4. Morgoth

    Morgoth

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,795 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    250
    Location:
    Netherlands
    yes only Nehalem Architect and sandybridge architect and the newer versions posible

    Only Nehalem architect and Sandybridge architect and the newer versions posible

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(CPU_architecture)
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2008
  5. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,740 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,539
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Looks nice at the price it's supposed to be, cant quite see the point of comparing it with loads of other CPU's in those benches that are clocked lower apart from the AMD comparisons of course, thing is, with a 7.5 multi it aint gonna go much faster than that 3.5Gig which means that a 65nm Kentsfield will better it in most cases (providing it's price competative).....I do think the 9450 is going to be the one to get!..............:respect:
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2008
  6. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,205 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    975
    Location:
    Miami
    DUDE, as many above posts have said,... in europe they write 3,000.00 as 3.000,00 check your windows language settings and u'll see... there is nothing being cut off, trust me.

    anyways, a quad at 3.5 GHz with gobs of cache is gonna be tough to beat... but then again, i dont think AMD is going anywhere, and once the phenom bugs are out theyre gonna be nice, cheap quadcores.
     
  7. Ser-J

    Ser-J New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    211 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Moneyapolis, USA
    I was just about to say that
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page