1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-3610QM Tested

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 20, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,871 (11.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,716
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Several next-generation performance-segment notebook models across brands, will be driven by Intel's Core i7-3610QM, a quad-core chip based on the 22 nm Ivy Bridge silicon, clocked at 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz Turbo), featuring 6 MB L3 cache. The chip features the complete instruction-set of Intel's third-generation Core processor family. DonanimHaber got to test a Samsung notebook that's based on this chip (which also uses NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M graphics), the chip was put through SuperPi 1M and 2M; and Cinebench R11. The chip crunched Pi 1M in 11.66 s, and 2M in 26.67 s. It scored 6.09 pts in Cinebench, which is a higher score than that of AMD FX-8150, DonanimHaber notes.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: DonanimHaber
     
    trickson and NHKS say thanks.
  2. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,178 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    it's the most funny thing :roll:
     
  3. (FIH) The Don

    (FIH) The Don

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,823 (3.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,910
    Location:
    Viking Land
    i have lost all faith in AMD's cpu segment :banghead:

    if they will focus on their smaller cpu's/apu's or wutdafuq its called and their graphics it will be good

    oh yeah, the new i7 looks mighty good :O
     
  4. Mulderer

    Mulderer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    8 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Bandung, Indonesia
    OMG an Intel mobile chip beats AMD's monster desktop..?
     
  5. radarblade New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    48 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    In the middle of Nowhere
    Damn! Those are like desktop 2600K scores! Ivy is packing a serious punch in it's mobile department. :eek:
     
  6. D4S4

    D4S4

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    697 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    the 3.3ghz turbo might have had something to do with it. i wonder what kind of clock speeds will the desktop variations run
     
  7. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    623 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    South Africa
    AMD's fastest desktop CPU beaten by Intel's fastest laptop CPU... that's sad any way you slice it.
     
    1c3d0g and [H]@RD5TUFF say thanks.
  8. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    & this isnt even the 'extreme'(i7-3???XM) edition..
     
  9. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    The old mobile 6 core I7s beat the desktop phenom IIs, i am willing to bet this has been happening for many generations thus nothing has changed.
     
  10. CAT-THE-FIFTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
  11. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    LoL

    I can't wait for pile of sh*t to come out. :D
     
  12. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    Intel just keeps pounding them Nails into the coffin of AMD!

    [​IMG] Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Take that :slap: AMD!
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2012
  13. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,840 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Do want!
     
  14. pjladyfox

    pjladyfox New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Messages:
    232 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Guess I was the only one who was more interested in scores for the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M than the CPU score. I mean, I like AMD but the entire Intel beating an AMD CPU at this point is like the local school jocks giving a swirlie to one of the nerds; sad it happens but not really a surprise anymore.
     
  15. dieterd New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    120 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    and this is only the weakest quadcore mobile processor, what preformance will i7-38xx QM and i7-39xx XM show.... those quad i7-26xx are very affordable so i7-36xx should make no difference, but to bad that real buyable products of thease will apear in the end of Q3 :(
     
  16. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    [​IMG]

    :roll: :banghead:
     
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  17. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    It doesn't make it any less pathetic, regardless of if it's SOP or not.
     
  18. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,169 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    586
    In the Cinebench it beats the desktop Intel i7 970. What's that say about Intel's desktop parts?

    So when is the leak going to happen with Wprime instead of the dated Super Pi that uses expired and non supported code path? (SSE vs x87 respectively)

    I love how all the Intel leaks always use absolutely worthless benchmarks to tell us any potential (or lack of) that the CPU has. :shadedshu
     
  19. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    LOL could you be more transparent, only an AMD fanboy would claim tests to be pointless that make AMD look bad, yet if it looked good for AMD they would be very important.

    The chip performs well, very well apparently, deal!
     
  20. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    384 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Its a good thing Intel doesn't compete with Intel.

    Also, SuperPi doesn't need to be optimized because its not a tool to compare different architectures.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2012
  21. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    384 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Since when did Intel produce a mobile 6 core part?
     
  22. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    No need to, A quad is still better than any thing AMD has. :eek:
    J/K :D but seriously yeah :laugh:
     
  23. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    In no way was i denying that, i was just trying to point out this is not a new thing since bulldozer, really it is just AMD getting it's ass kicked in the CPU market as usual for recent years.
    I may possibly be wrong :laugh: but if so i blame Eurocom for selling 6 core i7's in laptops.
     
  24. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,169 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    586
    Explain an AMD fanboy that spends $500 on an Intel part? I'd love to hear it.

    The problem is that nothing runs x87 code anymore, so why use it in a leak?

    Plus support for it was dropped in BD which is why Stars is faster in Super Pi. The majority of code is SSE in some version which is why I suggested wPrime but there is also y-cruncher.
     
  25. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    I agree .

    Funny how AMD fanboys hand pick a benchmark and say the rest mean nothing! Oh that one is too old or that one doesn't count! GIVE ME A BREAK!
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page