1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-3970X Extreme Arrives in Q4

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 23, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel's next high-end desktop processor, the Core i7-3970X Extreme, arrives in Q4, 2012, according to a DonanimHaber report. The i7-3970X is expected to ship with clock speeds of 3.50 GHz, with maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.00 GHz. The six-core chip is based on the 32 nm "Sandy Bridge-E" silicon, and built in the LGA2011 package. Its feature-set is consistent with that of the Core i7-3960X, with 15 MB shared L3 cache, HyperThreading, and unlocked base-clock multiplier. In all likelihood, the i7-3970X could displace the i7-3960X from its price-point.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DonanimHaber
     
  2. blibba

    blibba

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    831 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Location:
    Oxford, UK
    Another £1000 cripple edition. Man up already and give us 8 cores and 20MB of cache Intel. We know you'd have done it already if the 8150 wasn't such a joke. All you have to do is unlock the multiplier on a Xeon.
     
  3. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,666 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,324
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Another one? They could have just hurried up with IVB-E instead of wasting their time with this. :wtf:
     
    Random Murderer says thanks.
  4. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    It just makes no sense.
     
  5. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    hmm, a 3970X? ah, should have guessed it..

    and the one after that will be a 3980X and then finally the 3990X (unless of course they want to spoil thmesleves with a 3995X)... you cant waste those big chips, can u?

    so here it is, intel lga2011 desktop roadmap atleast till 2H 2013.
    i doubt intel 6-cores will become mainstream anytime soon
     
  6. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    871 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Extreme huh? We should be at 8-12 cores by now at least, if not at 16.
     
  7. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,495 (2.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,199
    exactly my thoughts
     
  8. MaKCuMyC

    MaKCuMyC

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    59 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ukraine
    stupidly.
     
  9. shilka

    shilka

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    44 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Oh for f**k sake intel give us Ivy Bridge-E already and stop wasting time with more Sandy Bridge CPU´s
     
    Random Murderer says thanks.
  10. Hustler New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    100 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    One of the consequences of AMD being out of the game these days unfortunately. Intel only has to give you what they want, not what you want.
     
  11. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,495 (2.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,199
    Let's just hope the IVB-E chips have a soldered IHS and not TIM like the 1155 IVB chips...
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
  12. Velvet Wafer

    Velvet Wafer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,123 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Location:
    North of Germany
    Well that is what happens when a company got a monopole for something.... they sit their asses flat, and charge gross amounts of money, for years old stuff :laugh:
     
  13. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    388 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    174
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    I don't understand why people spend $1000 on a CPU that doesn't offer any noticeable advantages over a $300 CPU.
     
  14. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,495 (2.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,199
    Because it has 2c/4t more. If you were referring to the 3930k, that's a $575 chip.
     
  15. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    On gaming, but if you'd do heavy rendering like I do, you would notice a lot of difference because tasks gets done in much less time

    [​IMG]

    I of course bought the 3930K because the 3960X doesn't give any performance edge with only 3MB L3 more cache.
     
    gopal and NHKS say thanks.
  16. shilka

    shilka

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    44 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    I want to replace my 3820 with a Ivy Bridge-E CPU the new 3940K or whatever Intel will name the middel model of the Ivy Bridge-E series
     
  17. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    u r right abt that..

    are rendering softwares primarily cpu accelerated? or is there a gpu option too?..

    I have tried keyshot.. its great but its cpu-acceleration only..i have seen demos of it using as many as 64-threads (on Xeons)
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2012
  18. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    It depends on the renderer and the workload, especially the last one, there are some tasks that are too complex to be rendered by a GPU.
     
  19. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,886 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,395
    Except that both AMD and Intel had $1000 CPU's at a time.
     
  20. gopal

    gopal

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,027 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
    Very good CPU but very expensive.

    i give it 10 points for performence
    i cut it's 11 points for price = Don't buy it
     
  21. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,639 (3.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,828
    If a company has a monopoly, they have to operate on a fine line. That line is where they make the most profit, but not too much profit that another company will try to join the market to get their slice of the profit pie. They wouldn't sell it at this price if no one bought it.

    I agree this processor is overpriced and the 3930k is a much better bang for your buck.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Morgoth

    Morgoth

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,795 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    250
    Location:
    Netherlands
    i want my 16 threaded xeons!
     
  23. gopal

    gopal

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,027 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
    16 threaded Xeons what performence do you get from it?
    Going to sleep (11:50 PM)
     
  24. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,639 (3.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,828
    Can I have a dual core 1 terahertz processor instead?
     
    Yo_Wattup says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  25. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,758 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,050
    These cpus make 1% of Intel s business.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page