1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-4770K Overclocked to 7 GHz

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 3, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,437 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,620
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Launch of Intel's Core i7-4770K "Haswell" processor may be a month away, but the chip has been in circulation for some time now. An overclocker going by the handle "rtiueuiurei" managed to get an engineering sample of the chip past the 7 GHz mark, 7012.65 MHz to be precise. A base clock of 91.07 MHz, multiplier of 77.0x, and a staggering 2.56V core voltage, unless CPU-Z read it wrong. A single 2 GB memory module was used; no other details were revealed. Core i7-4770K and a fleet of compatible socket LGA1150 motherboards launch around the first week of June.

    [​IMG]

    Source: OCaholic
  2. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    217 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Looking awesome - seems ivy bridge-E will be a waste of time for intel.
  3. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,706 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    975
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Holy crap!!! 2.65V???!!! That can't be right, CPU-Z must definitely be reading that wrong, there's just no way a CPU that complex can take that much voltage, not even on N2O :eek:

    As for the OC, other current CPUs have reached higher clocks, so unless Haswell has a much higher IPC throughput, I hope this is not the limit of its potential.

    Impressive still considering this is an ES.
  4. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,208 (2.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    287
    The question is what mobo can provide 2.65V ???????:eek:
  5. D4S4

    D4S4

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    697 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    +1, i think it should explode at that voltage
  6. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    505 (0.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
    [​IMG]
    ensabrenoir and Lionheart say thanks.
  7. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Yup. But let's be fair and forward here... it's a CHERRY-PICKED ES sample...


    Pretty nice, but what I'm more inclined to look at is the huge multi vs the downclocked BCLK.
  8. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Either a cherry picked sample or just a plane lie. i side with the lie..... Noway can any board handle that voltage and I am sure there is no board that will even come remotely close in the bios settings
  9. pjl321

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    108 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
  10. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Yeah... whatever with these claims (even tho I think the voltage is a display error to begin with). Let's wait for real tests from real people with real production chips... for some real numbers. Especially on AIO water loops and high-end air.
  11. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    409
    1.62 is a pretty old version of CPU-Z, so likely incorrect reporting considering there are already Haswell OC results that are nowhere near that voltage (albeit not 7GHz)
    [​IMG]
  12. LDNL

    LDNL

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    460 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    Finland
    That overclocks :twitch: with such low voltage
  13. Bo$$

    Bo$$ Lab Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,308 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    867
    Location:
    London, UK
    [​IMG]
    Alcpone says thanks.
  14. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,481 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,585
    Did you see the memory oc's from the article linked:
    "Haswell Achieves 3322 MHz Memory Overclock

    The most important thing to note is that the APACER memory on the Core i5-4670T rig was overclocked to an impressive 1661 MHz, which means an effective clock speed of 3322 Mhz. This is quiet impressive since these speeds are similar to what we would be looking at when DDR4 becomes standard in 2015.

    You can check out the validations below for yourself."
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I assumed that at 2.5v, the silicone would just explode, regardless of cooling.
  16. Roadrunner New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
  17. stasio

    stasio

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    651 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
  18. Steven B

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    598 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    with the same version of cpuz 1.62 which reads Vin instead of VCC, and which seems to be fun with haswell... lol...

    Why not update CPUz, new cpuz shows vcore instead.
  19. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,564 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    910
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    High clock overclocks are useless. And if DICE or LN is involved it's just pointless. Make a every day 24/7 system and post a high clock. Water cooling is freely allowed. Now thats what i always get impressed about. Ppl who run highly clocked systems 24/7.

    While 7GHz may sound impressive, it's just that, a worthless high clock you can't use for anything.
  20. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,525 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    933
  21. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    930 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    136
    Location:
    Australia
    I agree, this happens whenever a new CPU comes out, I can even remember Celerons being overclocked that high under the right conditions. Its pretty much normal with the right equipment.

    24/7 overclocks are much more important to me.
  22. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,196 (6.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,031
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I'm 100% for this. On every modern motherboard I've owned in recent years the caps on the VRMs can handle no more then 2.1v. This would make caps on almost any board pop if the VRMs for the CPU ran that high. I'm inclined to say that it is fake or the readout is wrong, but there is no way that CPU is running 2.5v.
  23. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,564 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    910
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
  24. stasio

    stasio

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    651 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    On CPU-Z 1.62 from October 2012. :cool:
  25. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,180 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    639
    Le sigh.... I wish I could add to this conversation... :)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page