1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Devil's Canyon" to Usher in 5 GHz-on-air Overclocking Era

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 12, 2014.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,252 (11.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,584
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Even as Intel launched its first Core "Haswell" Refresh socket LGA1150 chips, it left out two enthusiast-grade parts from the mix, the Core i7-4790K and the Core i5-4690K. Don't be misled into thinking that they're just multiplier-unlocked variants of the i7-4790 and i5-4690 launched today. There's a reason the two have be designated a separate internal codename altogether. Called "Devil's Canyon," the chips are made from high-performing dies binned out from the foundry, and placed on extra-durable packages with contact points that are designed for higher voltages, and a superior thermal interface material between the die and the integrated heatspreader (IHS).

    Better packaging (mind the pun) isn't the only thing that sets the i7-4790K and the i5-4690K apart form their non-K counterparts, they're are also clocked higher. The i7-4790K ships with an out of the box clock speed of 4.00 GHz (the first Intel processor to do so), with a Turbo Boost frequency of 4.40 GHz. The Core i5-4670K, on the other hand, ships with a clock speed of 3.50 GHz, with Turbo Boost frequency of 3.90 GHz. The TDP of both chips is rated at 88 Watts, a wee bit higher than the 84 Watts the non-K chips are rated at. Expreview believes that the two could usher in a new era in CPU overclocking without breaking the bank over HEDT chips, and could be capable of running at clock speeds of 5.00 GHz, on air-cooling. Intel is expected to launch the two chips to crowds at Computex 2014, followed by a market release in mid-June.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: Expreview
  2. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,562 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    Anyone else read this, and immediately think "So the refresh is Haswell, but more expensive and clocking more in line with SB?"

    Color me severely unimpressed.
    rtwjunkie says thanks.
  3. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    583 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
    A CPU shipping with a 4GHz default clock? It's about damn time.
  4. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,513 (7.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,879
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    For what it's worth, the AMD Athlon 750K/760K can already do 5Ghz on air.
  5. Ed_1

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    305 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    But clock for clock Haswell performs way better than SB , 4.4ghz is not bad .
    At least there doing something and catering to us , could just leave it alone , hopefully price be like before (minor increase) .

    Now if they can hit 5.0+ on air for avg chip that would impress me .
  6. Ed_1

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    305 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    P4 might do it to but that doesn't mean it performs good , can't compare apples to oranges .
  7. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,548 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    291
    loads of pr spiel with more, yet unfounded, claims.

    tbh i am more interested to know if trigate has finally beaten the coldbug?


    (he says, and will probably just get one anyway)
  8. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,507 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    931
    This going to work with Z87?
  9. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,513 (7.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,879
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    Exactly, so that means it's not the beginning of the era, it's halfway in :D
  10. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,562 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    First, don't multi-post. It's poor etiquet, and that's what the edit button is for.


    Next, you either misunderstand my intent or I did not convey it correctly. Intel has long since been pushing the clock speeds on successive generations of hardware higher. The truth was so often that you could expect the same overclocking jump. A 2 GHz stock would yield 2.5 GHz overclock; in the following generation the stock clock would be 2.2 GHz, while the OC would be 2.7 GHz (these are ballpark numbers to play with, not hard numbers). The switch from SB to IB to Haswell has yielded the opposite trend. Yes, stock clocks are higher. My problem is OCing has yielded less and less hefty clocks. SB at 5.0 GHz was a strong possibility, but Haswell that high is a statistical anomaly.

    Intel seems to be making good on their promise of "catering to enthusiasts." I'm just too jaded by two successive generations of crap thermal paste to really be happy that they've finally realized that only enthusiasts spend money to upgrade, when a 4+ year old chip will likely not be the bottleneck of their systems.
  11. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    806 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    244
    If they live up to the hype, these CPUs have the potential to cause a lot of enthusiasts to smash their piggy banks and scrape up the cash to upgrade. I will be tempted to go for it, even though I have a decent Ivy system, just for something new to play with. But if I do, I won't be able to justify upgrading to Broadwell at the end of the year. It would help if Intel announced special overclocking chips for Broadwell, so we'd know to skip Devil's Canyon and wait for better chips. Either way, the next CPU I'm buying will clock to at least 5 GHz, and that's certainly worth celebrating. These are great days for enthusiasts and overclockers, compared to the last few years anyway. This also threatens the HEDT market, so expect good things from Haswell-E and X99 later this year.
  12. BarbaricSoul

    BarbaricSoul

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,078 (2.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,980
    Uh, Haswell does not perform "way" better than SB, unless you consider 10-15% "way" better, which I do not. "Way" better to me is at least 25% better.

    I am interested to see how these actually perform, both OC'ing and temperature wise. Haven't had a chance to really play with a socket 1150 rig yet, this just might be it.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. TheHunter

    TheHunter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    892 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Location:
    Europa
    I thought 4ghz will be base turbo clock @ max load kinda like 4770k @ 3.9ghz..


    Yes.


    I can't believe how trolled people are @ overclock.net, all claim it won't be and what not, I mean they all take some Chinese rumors for granted, especially when it comes to Broadwell..

    While intel CEO/rep said in one YT video conference z87 will be compatible as well.. You can plug the chip into existing systems and 2nd we will have brand new systems z97,..

    I posted there 2-3 times, but this bs keeps going on almost everyday, now I stopped all together there, not worth the energy, let people be clueless monkeys lol

    Ah the power of interentz xD
    d1nky and BarbaricSoul say thanks.
  14. Svarog

    Svarog

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2012
    Messages:
    162 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Location:
    Netherlands
    I wouldn't risk the lottery if your 4770K can go past 4,5 GHz below 1.3 volts.
  15. d1nky

    d1nky

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,574 (6.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,218
    I didn't buy a 4770k due to the fact it's rare to find one capable of a decent overclocking ability. So I bought an ivy which cost around the same!

    Now in some benchmarks Haswell does outperform ivy by a margin with far lower clocks.

    I'm probably going to buy one of these devils just for overclocking purposes.
  16. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,169 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    ......once again.....in this tablet and smarter than most users phone generation.....I'm just happy to see true 100% full blooded cpu's still coming. Intel you can have.....some of my money. My hobby/addiction must live on!!!!
  17. xhawn11 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    27 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Sandy Bridge is back?
  18. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,173 (2.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    i hear that from sandy bridge
  19. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,355 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    552
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    5ghz is easy to get with the right chip.
    I think these could be some of the dearest consumer cpus we have seen in a long time though which is a shame (for me anyway).
  20. Breit

    Breit

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Messages:
    195 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Is there a plan at Intel to release a Devil's Canyon equivalent on the HEDT platform? That would interest me... 8)
  21. iO

    iO

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    68 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Germany
    I can already smell the juicy price premium.
    Lets see, maybe we'll get the first 400€/500$ mainstream CPUs...
  22. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,355 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    552
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Centurion already set that president and im seeing this as intels go at doing the same 900 $ min :(
  23. HisDivineOrder

    HisDivineOrder

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2013
    Messages:
    83 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    That higher end chip would finally warrant the premium the hyperthreading-variants of the K CPU's usually have.

    That said, I confess I'm unimpressed by this. If I were going to upgrade now, given how things are going with Intel CPU's and the unimpressive overall performance improvements they are making and have made over the last three years (SB-IVB-HW-HWrefresh-promise of unimpressive Broadwell gains), I have to say...

    I'm thinking in the long run Haswell-E is the better value. You get octa-core, more PCIe lanes, the promise of 2+ SLI/CF, and any advance you particularly like about Haswell (if there are any) except the integrated GPU.

    Since I don't use the integrated GPU (because I use SLI and use a dual-DVI 2560x1600 monitor which are unsupported by the DVI built onto motherboards even today), I don't see how spending more on a Haswell-E to have awesome performance for five or more years doesn't make more sense than spending less per year, but MORE over the course of several years for less performance.

    Plus a chip with 16 threads (8 cores, 8 hyperthreaded) and a LOT of RAM with superior memory support is incredibly tempting.
  24. rtwjunkie

    rtwjunkie

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    342
    Location:
    Louisiana
    You are correct, sir, that's what I was thinking. Although it clocks higher, the margins available, and the better TIM really reminds me that it's not so much an improvement, as it is a return to the SB way of doing it right.
  25. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    920 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    135
    Location:
    Australia
    They will sell like hotcakes. A lot of guys with Z87 need only buy a CPU, and they can still get a very good price for their 4770K on the second hand market.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page