1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Equipped to Lead Industry to Era of Exascale Computing

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 21, 2011.

  1. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,921 (7.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,500
    But will it run Crysis?
  2. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,819 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,897
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    :slap:
  3. Thatguy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    666 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Its going to try, and fail miserably at it.
  4. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    x86 PCI "blade" aka larrabee-phoenix, is a great way to scale a PC/workstation/server for asymmetric computational power.

    One CPU "horse" and 100 "mice". Perfect for 99% of real-world applications where CPU is not 90%+ all the time, but where you want lots of background threads, services, applications or VMs "ready".

    But I have said it before, and will say it again, windows task scheduler is not yet up to scratch to handle this. MS needs to build a more sophisticated scheduler that understands asymmetric CPU scaling.
  5. St.Alia-Of-The-Knife New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    195 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    o i get it, just like those pentium 4s, ordinary x86 architecture like a CPU
  6. spine7 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    6 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    2 million homes? 1.6GW/2000000=0.8Watt per home
  7. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,123 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    Until Intel can make drivers: I'll believe it when I see it.

    If nVidia is around long enough, then they will be first. If they are not, then AMD will be. In either case Intel will be last. If I could put money on it, I would.
  8. ASharp New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    225 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Location:
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    1.6GW is 1.6 billion watts...not 1.6 million. It would equal 800W per home. :slap:
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  9. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,596 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    that really enough for a household? a normal one that is. I know a lot of us on here use half to almost that much through our comps, but 800w?.... That sounds like xbox, tv, a light per room, no ac, and when you want to use the microwave you better unplug yo frig lol
  10. slyfox2151

    slyfox2151

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,606 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    524
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    average over the course of 1 days might be 800 watts per hour.....

    lots of people only have a fridge turned on during work/sleep.
  11. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,173 (2.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    Ohhh P2 is back! slot cpu's again
  12. Thatguy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    666 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Don't forget p1 and early p3 stuff as well as some AMD styled slot processors !
  13. function69 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    60 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    nice high-flow bracket
  14. meran New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    469 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    baghdad/iraq
    i cant see 32core beat gpu with 512 cores or 3200 sps
  15. MicroUnC

    MicroUnC New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    250 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Israel
    :roll::roll::roll:
  16. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    No.

    This is what has had ATI and Nvidia, scared for some time now, as Intel is the leading develpoer in advanced CPU architecture, it's not a stretch to think they could and are looking into GPU market, the first steps of which we see CPU's with integrated GOU's ion the chip, this is just the next step.
  17. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    There is more to it than just cores, it's all about the architecture.
    [H]@RD5TUFF says thanks.
  18. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    One of the reasons why Intel quad cores beat AMD hexa cores.
    TheMailMan78 says thanks.
  19. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,921 (7.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,500
    This is true in most cases.
  20. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,123 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    In which case I still stand by my statement. Until Intel can prove they can write drivers, ATI and nVidia are far, far from scared of this. It's more along the lines of this: :roll:
    Damn_Smooth says thanks.
  21. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,414 (6.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,394
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I doubt these things need much of any drivers (just a little something something to say hey, you got extra x86 processors over here). Also, I suspect these cards are going to sell for $2000+ a pop so it isn't like any of us are in the market for them. IBM, Cray, and other super-computer manufactureres will likely buy them up by the hundreds of thousands though.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. DaedalusHelios

    DaedalusHelios

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,920 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    812
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC, USA

    Basically Intel could rule the scientific research and discrete graphics card markets if they were willing to spend that much R&D money on it. They have deep pockets. But there isn't that much money to be made in the enthusiast and scientific markets versus family internet machines, and business solutions.
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2011
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  23. MikeX New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    125 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    would you say this is the x86 version equivalent of CUDA?
  24. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,414 (6.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,394
    Location:
    IA, USA
    It's the Intel version of NVIDIA Tesla. XD
    Crunching for Team TPU
  25. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,123 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    If they didn't need drivers (or very basic ones) then why do the nVidia and AMD Tesla and Firepro cards (respectively) cost so much?

    Its because of drivers.

    Intel wants the cast cow. Problem is they don't have the feed to feed them with.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page