1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel graphics. They have come far. Where are they going?

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by james888, Dec 14, 2012.

  1. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6332/50120.png
    Source

    Haswell came out and here is the review. They only had one review game the same as the previous reveiw and did not include hd 2500 or hd 3000.
    [​IMG]


    I used the review above just for reference. Intel hd2000 was really weak, hd3000 is still pretty weak, hd 4000, and hd 4600 is actually decent for low end graphics. A Intel has such an impressive RnD budget and talent. I wonder how far they can go and how fast. Of course Apu's are far superior in the gpu portion. That is not the point. Where is intel going?

    I bring this up simply for discussion.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2013
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. DayKnight

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2012
    Messages:
    359 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    I was watching them yesterday. I was pretty impressed when I saw Crysis Warhead's results.


    50% increase in raw power would be good for next gen.
     
  3. lyndonguitar

    lyndonguitar I play games

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,634 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Location:
    Philippines
    Not that impressive, although I was looking forward to that Intel Larrabee back then, too bad It was cancelled
     
  4. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    No. They are not good for much... yet. If they can keep up a 50% jump each generation I while amd and nvidea jump 25% they will catch up eventually. How far intel graphics will go I do not know. That is really why I made this topic. I find intels graphics prospects highly interesting.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    They have very much to cach up, just look at that graph it barely plays minecraft:(.
    That igp needs to be trippled or more to be competitive with llano ,trinity or whatever else they do.
     
  6. Protagonist

    Protagonist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    723 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    125
    Too bad, I would have bought one if it ever would have come out as gaming graphics card. For what its worth i always consider Intel's Graphics Solution to have best video/picture quality out of all the others, call me crazy but even if they are slow the quality of games/movies/pictures tend to be sharper/clearer/smoother than the other GPU offerings. Now if it could match up the others in speed and bring all the quality goodness with it, that would be nice.
     
  7. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    Its getting bigger and better every generation. Isn't haswell more igp than cpu now?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    APU > IHD, esp in price per performance in non-dedicated graphics card gaming.
     
  9. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    I do not deny that. It is 100%. Apu's have a better gpu than intels offerings all around. How long will that last though? Maybe a few years, maybe a decade or two.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    AMD's Fusion blows Intel out of the water. Nough said, Intel does not allocate much of the die to the GPU whereas AMD does with Bulldozer and Piledriver cores giving AMD much better capabilities. That chart is bullshit. They have AMD's old 6550D and Intel's new 3770K(4000). Amd uses 7660D with their new Trinity APU's. whoever did thatcomparison is using an old APU vs a new intel CPU.

    I did a comparison when I reviewed Trinity with my old club(no longer part of) vs the comparable pricepoint chip. The i3 3220K


    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2012
  11. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    That review I mentioned was before trinity. It was also the first one I could find as I did not look hard. It was only for reference. I'll get a better chart for reference, one with trinity.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2012
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Ahh, didn't see but the 7660D is even better.
     
  13. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Also I wrote:

     
  14. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    Of course Apu's are far superior in the gpu portion. Anyone who says otherwise is deranged or trolling. That is not the point. Intel has come quite far. They have an impressive RnD budget to throw at graphics. Where is intel graphics going?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    I don't think they will go anywhere unless they make some drastic changes to the way they are heading.

    What I do find is that graphics is not very important to them, so they will continue to fail in that division.
     
  16. Caspase

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    121 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portugal
    IMO it is really up to Intel and the market.
    I think trinity-like chips will be the future of laptops, thinner, efficient. As far as desktops go, personally it is hard for me to imagine not needing a dedicated graphics card.
    That said, laptops are a big chunk of the market, and if it starts to hurt where it counts (revenues and such) I guess Intel has the resources to develop a good chip really fast.
    Anyways, I should go ask my regular phsychic, futurology is not my thing...
     
  17. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,647 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    They do have the resources and the market is moving that way...
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  18. Caspase

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    121 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portugal
    I don't know where the market is headed anymore. Recession, direct ports, new consoles on the corner, the rise of SoCs, i5 powered tablets, AMD might fail in the near future, desktop keep declining, windows 8 was a dud...
     
  19. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Everyone says the market is moving that way and I believe that is hogwash. Smaller , faster has always been the mindset throughout history. I do not see businesses moving from workstations but convenience makes the market change in home computing for sure.
     
  20. Caspase

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    121 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portugal
    Well, as far as convinience goes, a pair of high powered rig at home and a hybrid tablet seems a good match.
    Most users seem to not agree with me on this tough...
     
  21. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,887 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,395
    Because it's wrong. For power users and gamers and the like sure it's good (throw in a laptop and some servers there too :D), but for most people high powered rigs are useless. Seriously, anything faster than Core 2 Duos are a waste for the vast majority of computer users.
     
  22. Caspase

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    121 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portugal
    So maybe software companies are to blame for the staleness going on...
    Windows 8 could have some new features of wonder that actually used new hardware capabilities (besides not sucking so bad on the metro side).
    You want a hybrid and a laptop? geez xD I can understand the servers tough. How about an apple too? Even if just the fruit
     
  23. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,887 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,395
    If anything MS should be praised for making it use resources wisely. If they had added stuff that maxxed out the hardware we have now it would be a righteous outrage about it. Unnecessary fluff is so yesterday. We want out computer to use less power yes?
     
  24. Caspase

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    121 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portugal
    Not exactly getting the message across... What I mean is there should be serious scaling involved. Everyone should be able to use the OS, and its base features, however adding options to take advantage of your better harware would be a plus in my book. Let's use aero for this. Is it necessary? No. Do I like it even tough it uses more power and resources for the sake of eye candy? Yes.
    But you are right, I am just bitching, maybe because sometimes I no longer feel the need to upgrade, and it's harder to justify a want, tough I still indulge.
     
    Frick says thanks.
  25. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,887 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,395
    Ah I get it now. Yes eye candy is sweet but to a limit imo. Make it too taxing and it's not worth it. IMO of course. And aero has some nice features to it actually, like aero peek (you hover the mouse over whatever is in the taskbar and you see a smaller version of it pop up).
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page