1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Ivy Bridge Desktop Processor Models Tabled

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Nov 28, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,410 (11.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,615
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Russian website Overclockers.ru claims to have a complete picture of what Intel's upcoming 22 nm Core "Ivy Bridge" desktop (2012 Core Processor Family) looks like. The site compiled model names, extensions, clock speeds, Turbo Boost speeds, L3 cache sizes, and TDP ratings of as many as 18 models, most of which are quad-core.

    The table reflects that most clock speeds are similar to today's Sandy Bridge LGA1155 processor models, some have Turbo Boost speeds as high as 3.90 GHz. Since Ivy Bridge silicon is an optical shrink of Sandy Bridge LGA1155, from 32 nm to 22 nm, and since Intel is using a more energy-efficient transistor design, there are significant improvements in TDP ratings.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Overclockers.ru
  2. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    3570K for me please :)
  3. Jarman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    388 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Location:
    Wrexham UK
    These will work in current p67 boards yes??
  4. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    Yes they will but you won't be sure of the PCI express 3.0 support
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,410 (11.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,615
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Extensions:
    • K = unlocked BClk multiplier
    • S = energy-efficient (while not compromising clock-speed)
    • T = low-power (lower clock-speed/core-count)
  6. INSTG8R

    INSTG8R

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,807 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Location:
    Lost in Norway
    Yes as long as the Manufacturer has put out an updated BIOS for it. I know my P67 is Ivy Bridge ready. I know I am eyeballing that i7 3770K if the prices are right.
  7. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Mine supported it with bios 902, and i don't care about pci-e 3, that can wait till my next board.
  8. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,175 (5.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,970
    Location:
    Home
    It looks like IVB is gunning for power/perf rather than raw increase in performance. Anyone shares the same view?
  9. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Hmm I expected a bigger drop in power than this from the 22nm Tri-gate process :/ Scratch that - there's more l3 cache. Interesting
  10. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,256 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,478
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Makes sense. They need to allow the performance to stay with the SB-E platform.
  11. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    These look good. As they're an incremental improvement over SB, I hope they will be priced about the same.

    I'll have the 8 thread i7-3770K to go, along with a side order of fries and ketchup. ;)

    Yes, that's true. When you consider the lack of competition from AMD and the fact that even a low end CPU can run most things including 3D games very well, it's not surprising.
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2011
  12. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Its not like they need to increase the performance, given the "competition" or the lack of.
  13. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Error in table:
    i5-3450S should be 65W

    (I'm only pointing this out because it got me confused...)

    There might also be a i5-3450T at 45W... who knows.
  14. loleafidas New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    84 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Somewhere I Belong
    Intel, pls dun cost me X79 for nothing, Bulldozer costed Asus Crosshair V Formula is enough :-|
  15. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,567 (4.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,967
    why are they all soo low powered? even my 945 is 95W!
  16. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,175 (5.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,970
    Location:
    Home
    Die shrink + 3D gate + already low power S-B
    de.das.dude and 1c3d0g say thanks.
  17. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,100 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    450
    These will be perfect for laptops, anyone knows if mobile versions will also be compatible with current laptop sockets?
  18. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,184 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    186
    .......no way around it I'm building 2 new machines....thanks a lot intel:)

    An Ivy bridge e would be more palletable than sbe though
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2011
  19. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    376 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    This table is screwy and must be fake.

    1) Only a single dual-core option? Dual core CPUs is where Intel makes most of their profits. Its not like most consumers really need 4 cores.

    2) Similarly, why so many more quad core options than with SB?

    3) Fill out the rest of the table with what it *should* have suddenly you're talking about way too many chips
  20. afw

    afw New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    642 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    release date ???
  21. afw

    afw New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    642 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    why not make quad-cores mainstream when mobile phones these days come with dual-cores (quad cores coming 2012 Q1) :D ...

    earlier dual-cores were highend single cores were mainstream ... then dualcores were mainstream and quad-cores were highend ... catch the pattern ... :toast:
  22. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,567 (4.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,967
    hope fully more quads mean they will be "competitively priced"
  23. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    There are more quad cores because they are getting into the dual core TDP range at which you can simply use them because the low TDP associated with the new lithography permits you to do so :)
  24. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,572 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,353
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    What I find incredibly interesting is the TDP of different speeds with same core and cache is the same.

    Taking the data at face value, does this mean that wattage is scaling non-linearly with core speed? Kind of hints that the K models will overclock like crazy. I hope so!
  25. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,410 (11.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,615
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    April 2012.
    Kantastic and afw say thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page