1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Nehalem Turbo-charges Radeon HD4850 Benchmark

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 2, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,958 (11.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,757
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel Nehalem Posts Impressive CPU Scores with 3D Benchmarks

    The rather lucky Taiwanese team of Tom's Hardware got their hands on an Intel Bloomfield engineering sample that has a clock-speed of 2.93 GHz, running on a Intel X58 chipset based motherboard made by Foxconn called Renaissance to evaluate a Gainward Radeon HD4850 sample. System details are provided below.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Of course, the benchmark lacks the advantage NVIDIA PhysX gives to the CPU score in 3DMark Vantage, but for a CPU alone, it is a more than decent score. The system secured P7182 at default settings with a CPU score of 17966. In 3DMark06, it churned out 12786 3DMarks with a CPU score of 5183. In the Crysis CPU benchmark, scores of 33.70 and 18.29 were recorded at 1280x1024 resolution with no anti-aliasing.

    Source: Tom's Hardware
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2008
  2. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,274 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    Nice results, but is it getting more punch out of the 4850? In fact, not really sure what this has to do with a 4850 at all. Could you put into the title and say the same thing?
     
  3. freaksavior

    freaksavior To infinity ... and beyond!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,075 (2.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    i have to agree, what exactly does the point out?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,958 (11.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,757
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    The fact that it's bringing out good CPU scores that affect this bench, and that this is perhaps one of the first published benchmarks of a video-card on a Nehalem derivative causes me to use that. So you get a glimpse of how Nehalem affects a HD4850 bench versus other benches using other CPU's that are all over the internet.

    Another reason why 'HD4850' was used in the title was to show there's no latest NVIDIA card that could affect CPU score and that there are pure CPU scores in the benchmark.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2008
  5. tvdang7 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    318 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    with me e6600 runnining 3.3ghz and my 4850 running 725/1025 my crysis bench runs at 31 frames. so that cpu does matter it beats me be 2 frames at default settings probably 4 or 5 frames overclocked.or more!!:banghead:
     
  6. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    well in 06 it gets 200 more points on the cpu vs mine at 3GHz :ohwell:
     
  7. Recoba

    Recoba New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Messages:
    10 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    forum.amtech.vn -Viet Nam
    Better than my system: Q6600@3.6Ghz & ASUS EAH4850 score P7079 in Vantage. But why they run dual Channel ?
     
  8. DanTheBanjoman SeƱor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
  9. Cold Storm

    Cold Storm Battosai

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    15,014 (5.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,999
    Location:
    In a library somewhere on this earth
    I can't believe that they used VGA monitor for the bench! You'd think they would use the DVI feature?
     
  10. mullered07

    mullered07 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,648 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    Location:
    UK
    how will that affect the performance, you could argue there would be a negligable visual increase (dependant on your eyes lol) but nothing further :wtf:
     
  11. Cold Storm

    Cold Storm Battosai

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    15,014 (5.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,999
    Location:
    In a library somewhere on this earth
    I was just saying that you would think of them as using a DVI type monitor instead of having to use the VGA extension.. That's all I was pointing out..
     
  12. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,829 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    We're still a ways away from it's release, and I believe these boards are still very new. It will likely speed up a decent amount before it's release.
     
  13. mullered07

    mullered07 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,648 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    Location:
    UK
    it has no relevance, at least no more than using a optical mouse vs a lazor mouse :wtf:

    also bear in mind this is on an engineering sample cpu and mobo, not too bad overall at stock clocks
     
  14. w2richwood New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    74 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Location:
    Alta Loma Ca.
    it's on first chipset i'm sure there will be more to come
    Rich
     
  15. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,807 (3.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Its still pretty amazing either way. Records and benchmarks have been using ATI hardware lately. Impressive!
     
  16. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,506
    Looks like we are seeing diminishing returns. I would have expected a higher score. The Nehalem 2.93GHz is an 8 core cpu right?
     
  17. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,829 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    No, it's a 4-core cpu w/ hyper-threading, giving it 8 logical cores in window's. I'm not sure what the difference is performance-wise, but I feel like 8 logical cores is probably not the same as 8 real cores.
     
    EastCoasthandle says thanks.
  18. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,506
    I see, well that would explain the results then.
     
  19. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,829 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    It would, really when you think about it, not only is the board and cpu not fully developed, but windows and vantage may be just warming up to the tech new. So many things working together, at this stage in the game I think those scores are just based on raw architecture power, and seem pretty nice.
     
  20. trt740

    trt740

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,935 (3.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,113
    what socket will N use 775 and if so will it only be for ddr3 based boards?
     
  21. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,506
    Lets see what develops this time. HT has always been a nice feature, even during the P4 days but it was never really utilized to it's full potential. If we see better support from the OS (Win7), games and other apps things will get very interesting indeed.
     
  22. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,829 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    No they got a whole new socket, and the architecture of the chipset has a ddr3 memory controller built in eliminating the fsb, so I'm assuming it's ddr3 exclusive. There was talk at one point of some of the lower models being compatible w/ 775, but that won't be till next year if at all. I don't see how it could w/ the way it operates though. Totally different way of clocking.
     
  23. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,244 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    303
    Correct me if i'm wrong but i think they're highlighting the CPU score of the respective benchmarks.

    Against other quad CPUs @ the same speed, aren't those scores very high?

    EDIT

    This is, ofc, without the physX thing.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2008
  24. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,958 (11.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,757
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Yes, the postmortem of my news post is in post #4 in this thread. Dan's 2x 2-core Xeon murders it. :eek:
     
  25. InnocentCriminal

    InnocentCriminal Resident Grammar Amender

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,484 (1.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    Don't forget that the Renaissance\X58 is still in it's infancy, so the BIOS is most likely really immature and hindering the performance of both the CPU and therefore bringing the 4850 down. Could explain why they're running in Dual Channel and not Tri-Channel. So, for an early, initial look at a Nehalem it's pretty promising really. I would really like to see them repeat this test once Foxconn give them a BIOS update, I expect we'd see pretty different results.

    As for the 2.93GHz Bloomfield, I thought that this chip was only a quad-core but would handle 8-threads.

    Translated version of the original link.
     
    lemonadesoda says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page