1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by windwithme, Jan 7, 2011.

  1. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    About one and a half years ago, Intel released LGA 1156, and plus three chipset P55/H55/H57.
    As to CPU, main products are Core i3/i5/i7, and their obvious features are:
    dual-core with built-in GPU, quad-core with built-in HT, and quad-core without built-in HT respectively.
    As mentioned before, the primary goal of LGA 1156 platform is to replace Intel high-intermediate-level products;
    besides, LGA 1366 is still the predominant platform for the high-level ones.

    The product positioning of the new LGA 1155 is similar to that of LGA 1156.
    To most users, they probably feel that the replacing is too fast. When facing three kinds of LGA platform, they even feel perplexed.
    If future price of LGA 1156 can be lowered appropriately,
    it is also a good trend that the platform becomes the mainstream for low-intermediate-level products.

    [​IMG]

    At the beginning of 2010, Intel introduced 32nm CPU, and the related products are:
    dual-core—LGA 1156 i3 and i5; six-core—LGA 1366 i7 980X Extreme, representing low and high-level CPU respectively.
    As for 32nm quad-core processor, Sandy Bridge LGA 1155 will be released in 2011.

    This article will introduce the latest LGA 1155 platform, and analyse important features about 32nm Sandy Bridge CPU.
    As for the CPU, it is Intel Core i7-2600K, and “K” means that CPU multiplier can be unlocked.
    The clock is 3.4GHz (maximum: 3.80GHz), and Turbo Boost 2.0 technology is supported.
    There are 4 Cores and Hyper-Threading technology, so 8 Threading is supported, also abbreviated as 4C/8T.
    And, the CPU uses 32 nm manufacturing process, with 95W and 8MB L3 Cache, is the highest-level specification amongst current LGA 1155.

    [​IMG]

    Back side of 2600K D1 and 2400 D2:
    [​IMG]

    The motherboard is BIOSTAR TSERIES TP67XE, and this brand’s products are famous for parity and overclocking.
    The colour of the package is different; this time red makes the looking of the motherboard more distinguishing feature.
    [​IMG]

    Accessories:
    User’s Manual, Rear I/O Panel for ATX Case, Serial ATA Cable, CorssFire/SLI Bridge, Fully Setup Driver CD.
    [​IMG]

    As for colour matching, PCB is black, and PCI-E or DIMM are matched red or white; the whole appearance looks not bad.
    [​IMG]

    Red matching is an eye-catching design.
    More and more electronic products are matched red and black,
    the colour combination (similar to the colour used in automobile racing) that stresses speed or high performance.
    [​IMG]

    Lower-left of the motherboard:
    2 X PCI-E 2.0 X16: support 2Way CrossFireX and SLI technology, with bandwidth X8+X8
    2 X PCI-E X1
    2 X PCI
    LAN chipset: Realtek RTL8111DL
    Codec: Realtek ALC892, with 8+2 channels and supporting Blu-ray Codec technology
    [​IMG]

    Lower-right of the motherboard:
    3 X red SATAII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10
    2 X white SATAIII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10
    Power button, reset button, and debug indicators
    [​IMG]

    Upper-right of the motherboard:
    4 X DIMM DDR3, supporting 1066/1333/1600/1866/2133, maximum capacity of DDR3 is 16GB. Only by overclocking can DDR3 2133 above be achieved.
    1 X IDE, 24-pin power connector
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2011
    Nosada says thanks.
  2. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Upper-left of the motherboard:
    TP67XE adopts 10-phase power supply, the design that is enough for 32nm CPU. There are two 8-Pin power connectors,
    which are usually seen only on high-level motherboard (such as for server).
    The existence of dual 8-Pin is not aimed at high power consumption of P67,
    but at LN2 users who have to consume more 12V under high clock (such as overclocking).
    [​IMG]

    IO:
    6 X USB 2.0 (Red/Black)
    2 X USB 3.0 (Blue)
    1 X eSATA/USB 2.0 (both Red)
    1 X 1394
    1 X RJ-45
    1 X S/PDIF
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    In the past, I preferred not using a computer case when testing hardware.
    But this time many net pals hope me to use a case so that the test result,
    such as overclocking ability and temperature, will be more similar to most consumers’ condition.
    The case is high-intermediate-level product
    Antec DF-35, with 1 x top 140mm fan, 1 x rear white 120mm fan, and 2 x front variable-speed 120mm fans with white LED.
    DF-35 has such advanced cooling system that it is helpful to keep the system steady after the computer is overclocked.
    [​IMG]

    Test platform:
    CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K
    MB: BIOSTAR TSERIES TP67XE
    DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT CMT4GX3M2B2133C9
    VGA: GIGABYTE GTX460 OC
    HD: Intel X25-V 40GB RAID 0
    POWER: Antec High Current Gamer 620W
    Cooler: Mega Shadow Deluxe Edition
    Case: Antec DF-35
    OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
    [​IMG]

    Whole LGA 1155 system in Antec DF-35:
    [​IMG]

    BIOSTAR provides much software:
    [​IMG]

    Energy-saving software has been very popular in recent years.
    CPU can effectively lower power consumption according to user’s setting.
    [​IMG]

    TOVERCLOCKER is BIOSTAR’s unique software
    The software provides CPU, Memory information, and also shows H/W Monitor.
    [​IMG]

    In TOVERCLOCKER, OC TWEAKER, which can adjust many clocks, is a useful tool to overclock.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2011
    abirdie4me says thanks.
  3. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Default performance:
    CPU 100.1 X 35 => 3502.7MHz (Turbo Boost enabled, C1E disabled)
    DDR3 2135.2 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V

    The architecture of Sandy Bridge CPU is different from that of previous Core i7. The bus speed is changed to 100MHz.
    And about other frequency information, the highest ratio of 1366 CPU is 133/1866, 1156 CPU is 133/1600.
    Now the default frequency of 1155 CPU can achieve 100/2133, making DDR3 clock show better performance.

    Hyper PI 32M X8=> 14m 57.750s
    CPUMARK 99=> 540
    [​IMG]

    Nuclearus Multi Core => 22513
    Fritz Chess Benchmark => 27.58/13236
    [​IMG]

    CrystalMark 2004R3 => 332817
    [​IMG]

    CINEBENCH R11.5
    CPU => 6.83 pts
    CPU(Single Core) => 1.43 pts
    [​IMG]

    PCMark Vantage => 19941
    [​IMG]

    3DMark Vantage
    CPU SCORE => 53268
    [​IMG]

    The default clock of 2006K is 3.4GHz. After Turbo Boost 2.0 is enabled, the clock can achieve 3.5~3.8GHz by CPU usage.
    Hence, the test figures above are great, so the result means CPU can easily deal with many tasks under any circumstances.
    And as to CPU performance under the same clock, I find that LGA 1155 is about 10% higher than LGA 1156.
    As to DDR3 bandwidth, probably with more advanced Memory Controller technology, I find there is 20~30% performance improvement in much software.
    Therefore, about basic performance and DDR3 bandwidth, Intel Sandy Bridge CPU with latest architecture has made great progress.

    Temperature:
    System standby: 33℃~37℃
    http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6573/bp67dt1.pngCPU in full usage: 44℃~47℃
    Intel Burn Test v2.4,Stress Level Maximum
    [IMG]http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9463/bp67dt2.png

    Hence about the temperature of 2600K:
    Standby: about 3℃~5℃lower than the temperature of 1156 45nm CPU.
    Full usage: about 10℃lower than the temperature of 1156 45nm CPU.
    It goes without saying that as to testing temperature, different motherboards display divergent results.
    But through the comparing, we can observe the temperature difference between 32nm and 45nm of 4C8T.

    Power consumption:
    Standby: 84W
    [​IMG]

    CPU full speed: 125W
    [​IMG]

    As to power consumption, with 32nm manufacturing process technology, the power saving of this CPU is 30~50W more than that of 45nm Core i7.
    So obviously Sandy Bridge CPU can save more energy, and this is also one of the reasons why consumers may prefer quad-core platform.
     
    KieX and aCid888* say thanks.
  4. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Please refer to my BIOS setting:
    Boot logo:
    [​IMG]

    Main page:
    Compliency is AMI UEFI X64 2.0
    [​IMG]

    O.N.E page:
    The default setting of Turbo Mode is 38, 37, 36, and 35, with better CPU speeding up mode in version 2.0.
    As to DRAM frequency, 1066~2133 modes are supported, so users can enjoy better DDR3 performance.
    CPU Base Clock shows 10000, which means current bus speed is 100.00MHz; if it shows 10560, which means 105.60MHz.
    Therefore, the item may not show an integer, such as 133, 166, 200MHz.
    [​IMG]

    The setting above is DDR3 arguments, providing users to choose faster arguments; of course, making the system steady is also important.
    There are 4 modes for CPU VCore Mode: SPEC Volgate/Auto/Offset Mode/Fixed Mode
    CPU VCore Offset +0.010~+0.520V
    CPU VCore Fixed 1.000~1.790V
    [​IMG]

    DRAM Voltage 1.300~2.200V
    [​IMG]

    CPU Configuration:
    Some functions about CPU, such as common HT technology; you also can choose how many cores you want to activate.
    [​IMG]

    PC Health Status:
    With built-in monitor chipset, you can know main voltage or temperature information.
    [​IMG]

    As to overclocking, this time it is not necessary for LGA 1155 to adjust too many items.
    So just focus on CPU voltage, clock multiplier; and DRAM clock, arguments, voltage.
    Due to the limited scope of bus speed (about 5~7%), using K series CPU would be a better choice to overclock substantially.

    As to DDR3, I use US brand CORSAIR high-level DOMINATOR-GT series—the latest CMT4GX3M2B2133C9.
    GT series use red and black as colour matching; in recent year, more and more motherboard and DRAM also use the two colours.
    [​IMG]

    The argument specification is CL9 10-9-27 1.50V.
    Compared with DDR3 voltage specification (1.650V) recommended by Intel, 1.50V only of GT 2133 can make the system steady.
    AIRFLOW of Red-black version with DOMINATOR-GT makes the appearance quality nicer.
    [​IMG]

    CPU 3502.8MHz DDR3 2135.2 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V
    ADIA64 Memory Read: 22132 MB/s
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 28132 MB/s
    MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 21755 MB/s
    [​IMG]
     
    KieX, qu4k3r and aCid888* say thanks.
  5. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    CPU 5020.4MHz DDR3 2142 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V
    ADIA64 Memory Read: 25582 MB/s
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 28475 MB/s
    MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 28139 MB/s
    [​IMG]

    After CPU clock rises, the test figures of memory bandwidth in ADIA64 and MaXXMEM also rise obviously,
    but not in Sandra Memory Bandwidth; this is the main difference amongst the three software.
    And about the test figure of bandwidth, even if LGA 1155 and LGA 1156 are both dual-channel design,
    the former shows about 20% greater performance than the latter does.
    Although Sandy Bridge CPU only uses dual-channel design, its memory bandwidth can compete with that of LGA 1366.

    ADIA64 Memory Read: 26605 MB/s
    Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 29903 MB/s
    MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 29007 MB/s
    [​IMG]

    Due to the limited scope of bus speed of Sandy Bridge architecture, about only 104~108MHz can be adjusted (depending upon each CPU).
    The default CPU bus speed can contribute to achieve DDR3 2133 clock rate, so overclocking would not be a big problem.
    If DRAM quality is good enough, performance over DDR3 2200 is not a difficult challenge.

    Overclocking performance:
    CPU 100.4 X 50 => 5020.2MHz(Turbo Boost disabled; C1E disabled)
    DDR3 2142 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V

    Hyper PI 32M X8=> 12m 06.384s
    CPUMARK 99=> 774
    [​IMG]

    Nuclearus Multi Core => 32585
    Fritz Chess Benchmark => 39.29/18859
    [​IMG]

    CrystalMark 2004R3 => 427585
    [​IMG]

    CINEBENCH R11.5
    CPU => 9.82 pts
    CPU(Single Core) => 2.05 pts
    [​IMG]

    PCMark Vantage => 25062
    [​IMG]

    3DMark Vantage
    CPU SCORE => 65044
    [​IMG]

    After 2600K is overclocked from 3.5 GHz to 5GHz, performance increases 20~30% in most software mentioned above.
    When CPU is in full usage, voltage only needs 1.392V; hence, 32nm manufacturing process makes overclocking ability much better.
    According to the related information I acquired on the Internet, 2600K over 5GHz is not commonly seen;
    generally, the scope 2600K D1 is about 4.7~4.9GHz under air-cooling system.
    The performance of Sandy Bridge is still better than 45nm 4C8T CPU (overclocking scope is 4.1~4.3GHz).

    Temperature:
    System standby: 43℃~46℃
    [​IMG]

    CPU in full usage: 74℃~83℃
    Intel Burn Test v2.4,Stress Level Maximum
    [​IMG]

    If you want to overclock over 5GHz, you have to increase voltage, and note that temperature also rises much.
    If you prefer low voltage and temperature for long-time using, 4.5GHz can be steady under 1.272V only.
    Users can set personal setting by their preference.
     
  6. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Power consumption test:
    System standby: 139W
    [​IMG]

    CPU in full usage: 257W
    [​IMG]

    Compared with power consumption of default clock rate:
    Power consumption of system standby: 65% higher
    Power consumption of CPU in full usage: 105% higher
    It seems that the consumption increase so much, but as far as 5GHz high clock rate and high performance platform is concerned, 257W can be acceptable.

    By the way, is 5GHz the maximum for 2600K under air-cooling? If fortunately, 5.1GHz can be achieved steadily.
    CPU 100 X 51 => 5100.4MHz(Turbo Boost disabled; C1E disabled)
    DDR3 2133.6 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V

    Hyper PI 32M X8=> 11m 48.382s
    Fritz Chess Benchmark => 40.11/19251
    [​IMG]

    As to the latest Sandy Bridge LGA 1155 CPU in 2011, 2300~2500K all use L3 Cache 6MB, and only 2600/2600K is equipped with 8MB.
    K series are 2500K and 2600K, but other Sandy Bridge CPU, with limited scope of bus speed, may only have 5~8% overclocking scope.
    Therefore, LGA 1155 is categorised definitely.
    To the consumers who want to overclock, choosing K series is suggested, but with higher prices.
    And most of the other Sandy Bridge CPUs may be suitable to the consumers who don’t overclock.
    About the consideration above, I’m not sure that Intel is overconfident with Sandy Bridge performance, or that Intel wants to let LGA 1156 survive.

    Originally, I thought that the reason why clock rate and power consumption of LGA 1155 platform made great progress was that 45nm manufacturing process became 32nm.
    However, afterwards I find that all Sandy Bridge CPUs are built in GPU,
    so it will be more convenient for users in future to use the chipset with display output function, such as H67.
    Moreover, another advantage of this new platform is that it has higher performance of DDR3 and Turbo Boost 2.0 technology.

    [​IMG]

    I use new generation P67 chipset in the test.
    When manufacturers release P67 motherboards in the market, their prices, I estimate, will be a bit expensive than the prices of P55 motherboards.
    BIOSTAR TP67XE is still featured parity, and the price is about US$160.
    The motherboard supports the latest USB 3.0 and SATA3; unique BIO-Remote2 multimedia software; and THX TrueStudioPRO sound effects technology.
    Furthermore, TP67XE also shows great performance of overclocking, so it can be a high C/P P67 product.
    BIOSTAR now also aims for supporting multimedia software and hardware technology, making its products more competitive in the market.

    I shared much overclocking experience about X58 and P55 before,
    and I shall continue overclocking and analysing P67 motherboards from various brands in future.
    If there is something this article doesn’t mention, I shall renew related information in the future reports.
    Finally, I hope with the release of new generation products, the prices of previous generation platforms can be lowered faster.
    So, consumers can choose more platforms with good quality at bargain prices.

    This article is also in my blog WIND 3C. Any comments are always welcome :)
     
    15th Warlock, Nosada, wolf and 15 others say thanks.
  7. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,778 (9.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,239
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I love winwithme's reviews but i really want to see a 2600K CPU that is not a ES and that is straight from a regular retailer that is random to be benched. Im tired of seeing ES chip results instead of what the everyday user will be getting when they order from say NEWEGG.com
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    11,250 (4.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,803
    Location:
    US
    It be much better if it was put all in one post lol.
     
  9. TeXBill

    TeXBill

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,358 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Location:
    TX
    Great review windwithme.
    Now lets see some of these chips hit the market, so we all can get a chance to OC them.
     
  10. aCid888*

    aCid888* New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,754 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Location:
    In a state of flux...
    Yes, because putting all the results in one post would of made the review oh-so-much better. :wtf: (yeah, I'm sarcastic)




    As for the review?

    Thats some serious memory bandwidth....makes me stupidly jealous :laugh:


    I'm looking forward to seeing more from this platform...it does appear to be very promising......that and Biostar are actually looking good for once. :D :toast:
     
  11. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,624 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    269
    Location:
    London
    Thanks for the review; it surely took you some time.
     
  12. aCid888*

    aCid888* New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,754 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Location:
    In a state of flux...
    Hit the thanks button for this guy; this stuff takes time to put together and its only right you give him some recognition. :)
     
  13. Nailezs

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    863 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    this was an impressive review. i cant rell you how many times i went "damn!" or "oooo!" or "uhh!" lol. eventually my boss comes over and says "what are you doin??" lol
    she rolled her eyes when i told her it was about new intel processors and a 5ghz oc rofl
     
  14. mstenholm

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,141 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Thank you Windwithme. I see that you had the chip for some time (20-11-2010). Care to lose it now that you are done ;)
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2011
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  15. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2011
  16. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,563 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
  17. travva

    travva New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    349 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Hampton, VA USA
    this was a great review. very professional and well done.
     
  18. Hms1193

    Hms1193 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    72 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Lahore, Pakistan
    Nice Review, Im so getting the i72600K. :D

    Not only does it overclocks great but the temps alone. :O MMmmm. :p
     
  19. windwithme

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    527 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Update
    BIOSTAR TP67XE 1/3 BIOS - Internal PLL Voltage Override
    [​IMG]

    2500K D2 OC 5404MHz
    [​IMG]

    Thanks :)
     
    15th Warlock, KieX and mstenholm say thanks.
  20. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,818 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,275
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    OMG! I have not even reached 5Ghz with my D2 2600K, I had read that using the internal PLL voltage overide for the reatil procs. (D2 stepping) was the key to unlocking this bad boy's full potential.

    Gigabyte just released a couple days ago a rev. F7 BIOS for their UD7 mobo, haven't tried it yet as it is a beta, but it unlocks this setting in the BIOS precisely. I think I may give it a try after reading this, thank you!
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2011
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page