1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel SSD Roadmap Leaked

Discussion in 'News' started by alexp999, Jan 30, 2009.

  1. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    The guys over at VRZone have got their hands on the roadmap for Intel's SSD products. It has been said that Intel will be moving to a smaller fabrication process from 50 nm to 34 nm by Q4 2009 with capacities available up to 320 GB. The successor to Intel Turbo Memory has also been detailed, known as Braidwood and set for release in Q1 2010, it is said to, "provide SSD-like performance on second generation Ibex Peak chipsets like Q57, P57 and H57." Though to use Braidwood you will need, "Firmware support, Intel Rapid Storage Technology as well as the Braidwood module." These come in smaller capacities ranging from 4 GB to 16 GB, and will also be based on Intel's new 34 nm fabrication process. There is no official word on pricing as yet, but these new products are not expected to be cheap.

    [​IMG]

    Source: VRZone
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2009
  2. Homeless

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,025 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    I wonder how long it's going to take for these to become affordable
     
  3. Weer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,417 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    New York / Israel
    You can already buy 64-128GB SSD's these days for 100-200$. Intel just asks too much.
     
  4. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,258 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    966
    Braidwood integrated non-volatile cache sounds nice. I guess that means "instant" hibernate. Power off... actually means shift everything to the non-volatile cache... and shut down. Reboot means reloading the memory state from the "cache".
     
  5. abrictech New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    If you pay attention to details, there are performance differences among SSDs. You pay what you get..

    Intel is currently the fastest SSD around, and many more challengers will emerge soon and bring down the price at higher spec.. A very good news for all.
     
  6. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,932 (5.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Ohio
    I'd love to have all SSDs but it's only a poor man's dream atm. I got a 250GB and 500GB serial drive, and I think they're going to be here to stay for a long time.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    How does your comment apply this this news article?
     
  8. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,932 (5.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Ohio
    ah, how does yours? Weer's contributes more than this comment did. He was trying to say that he thinks Intel solid state discs are too expensive in comparison with the others available.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    He said you can buy them now for 100-200 and that that's too expensive. Now read the part I quoted from the article and you'll understand my question. How does my question apply? It's a response to his statement, it's called a discussion.
     
  10. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,932 (5.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Ohio
    He said current 64 and 128gb SSDs, not the new ones on the roadmap. He was making a comment about Intel SSDs in general in comparison to other SSDs, roadmap or no roadmap. Well thats what I believe he was saying anyway, only he knows for certian.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Exactly, and how does the current models being too expensive apply to the new ones which clearly state "price unknown"?
     
  12. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    I think he is basically saying that Intel ask too much for their SSD's, I mention at the bottom, that there is no word on pricing, but they are expected to be expensive.
    Weer's comment is basically saying that a lot of companyies are bringing out SSD's at much lower price points than Intel, so my interpretation of their comment is that Intel needs to justify the higher price tag, if it turns out to be as expected.
     
  13. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,932 (5.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Ohio
    Well what do you expect the price to be if current non-intel SSDs are already at $100-$200? I would think expensive, a lot more expensive than current "cheap" SSDs.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. pr0n Inspector

    pr0n Inspector

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,334 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    164
    those cheap SSDs are not much better than HDDs. they are the ones that are asking too much.
     
  15. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,177 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    SSD 320 GB , dumm how much price for this
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page