1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Thunderbolt To Go Beyond Macs in April 2012

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Dec 27, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,960 (11.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,757
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel notified its partners in the PC industry that its Thunderbolt 10 Gbps interconnect will enter the PC ecosystem in April, 2012. Around that time, Intel will launch its third-generation Core processor family, and waves of new motherboards are likely to launch. It is likely that Thunderbolt will be the defining feature of many of these motherboards. Along with PC motherboards, the technology is likely to feature on pre-built desktops, and notebooks. The propagation of Thunderbolt is limited for a variety of reasons. First, its host controller costs more than $20, second, there already an established ecosystem of USB 3.0, a slower, yet competitive interconnect that maintains backwards compatibility with its older versions, and third, Intel has restricted the technology to Apple.

    The cost of adoption, starting with host controllers, is expected to drop in the second half of 2012, and so the technology should standardize gradually in the future. 10 Gbps might be more than plenty of bandwidth for now, but the demand for faster device interconnects will only rise. Among the companies that have come forward with plans to adopt the technology, Sony is expected to adopt it among many of its product lines; ASUS into its high-end notebooks, and so will Gigabyte. Gigabyte will also embrace the technology for its motherboards in April, in a bid to increase competitiveness against ASUS and ASRock. Thunderbolt will be the next "features USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gb/s" marketing label for motherboard vendors.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DigiTimes
     
    95Viper says thanks.
  2. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    I don't like this, the original was suppose to be 100Gbps with 2way Fiber Optic, and going to compete with USB 3.0 which is very fast already and SATA III. Now they try to sell 10Gbps with Coaxial cable instead. Intel will have a hard time making this a standard. Without AMD adopting this, it won't take off imo.
     
  3. iLLz

    iLLz

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    93 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    West Deptford, NJ
    Yea right. AMD doesn't have to support it to make it a standard. And what difference does it make if its optical or copper, as long as you get the 10Gbps speed?

    Intel worked it out to get the speeds without needing optical cables so that makes it cheaper for us to buy. Plus I heard you can still get the optical cabling but it will cost more.

    At any rate this is good news. Now to see if it will become ubiquitous!
     
  4. EpicShweetness

    EpicShweetness

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    321 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Ft Gordon
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but is'nt Thunderbolt the "do anything" port? Meaning it can do video, data, etc? I for one think Thunderbolt is a good standard with USB. For peripherals such as your key bored Thunderbolt does'nt make sense USB does. However, if I got integrated graphics, and I use it for a fast file transfer at the same time! :cool:
    I it's on the Z77 boards with Ivy Bridge, consider a upgrade!
     
  5. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Where was it stated at the original was supposed to launch at 100Gbps?
     
  6. qwerty_lesh

    qwerty_lesh

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    534 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Look into before it was called Thunderbolt (Light peak)
     
  7. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    I have. Nothing comes up except some FUD reports.
     
  8. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,206 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    270
    Too much competition. Apple tried ADC, failed. Thunderbolt may last a little longer because Intel is pushing it, but ultimately I doubt it will truly get widely adopted. Least not until consumers can be convinced of the value. Still got tons of monitors out there using VGA/DVI. Can't just replace those overnight.
     
  9. DriedFrogPills

    DriedFrogPills New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    356 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    Werribee, Victoria, Australia
  10. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    "Light Peak is what Intel is calling its first consumer implementation of an external optical bus, and will start at 10 gigabits per second"

    So they are exactly where they said they would be, but with a cheaper, copper medium. Where's the problem again? No one claimed this would be 100Gbps out of the box (or even 50, or 40) in the first gen.
     
  11. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    I'm only interested if I get cheap 10Gb Ethernet over Thunderbolt which won't suck due to CPU limitations.
     
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  12. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    14,109 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,929
    Location:
    IA, USA
    This. I want consumer-grade InfiniBand dammit (up to 300 Gbit/s)!
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    I already have 10 Gb Inifiniband, it's limited by CPU. Getting around 200-250MB/s max. Plus cable length is an issue.
     
  14. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    14,109 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,929
    Location:
    IA, USA
    How could it be limited by the CPU (last time I checked, L3s were running at 22+ GB/s)? That's only 1.25 GB/s so you should be able to completely fill the bandwidth if you were copying from the RAM of one computer to the RAM of another. It's almost always HDDs/SSDs holding InfiniBand/Thunderbolt back.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Bandwidth of CPU cache has nothing to do with the speed at which the CPU handles the whole TCP stack. Infiniband controllers don't include any actual networking hardware, think of it as Realtek vs Intel NICs. The Realtek chips perform worse, no matter your L3 cache bandwidth.

    Care to share the source that says "It's almost always HDDs/SSDs holding InfiniBand/Thunderbolt back"? Specially since there are no 10Gb Thunderbolt NICs available in the first place.
     
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  16. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Hey Dan, what happened to that "cheap infiniband" article you worked on for a while? :)
     
  17. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Been quite busy and actually forgot about it :) Have had time recently. Might have to revive that.
     
  18. qwerty_lesh

    qwerty_lesh

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    534 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    robn says thanks.
  19. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,212 (4.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,995
    Location:
    Home
    They decided to start off with the copper flavoured ones first to reduce the cost. And the article is a bit misleading, Sony Vaio Z uses Thunderbolt for its external graphics card. Intel wants to push this for its ultrabook standard docking system, but whether its cheap enough to be successful remains to be seen.
     
    robn says thanks.
  20. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Which part of "in the next decade" you failed to catch?
     
  21. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,784 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    CPU Mag has an article about Light Peak hitting 100Gbps via Fiber Optics. This is where I've read it.
     
  22. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Yes, but what does this have to do with the fact that the original was never intended to launch with 100Gbps anyway?
     
  23. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,212 (4.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,995
    Location:
    Home
    To be fair they did extensive testing and it was intended to launch at 100Gbps, until quite late into the development.
     
  24. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Is there a source for that?
     
  25. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,212 (4.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,995
    Location:
    Home
    There wouldn't be a definitive source, but if you have followed their development path you will have known that they started off with optical, but was so impressed with copper's performance that they decided to introduce Thunderbolt on copper first.

    The wiki article will give you a rough idea, but again, its not a "source"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Thunderbolt
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page