1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel to Acquire Fulcrum Microsystems

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 19, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,749 (11.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,678
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel Corporation today announced it signed a definitive agreement to acquire Fulcrum Microsystems Inc., a privately held fabless semiconductor company that designs Ethernet switch silicon for data center network providers.

    “Intel is transforming from a leading server technology company to a comprehensive data center provider that offers computing, storage and networking building blocks,” said Kirk Skaugen, Intel vice president and general manager, Data Center Group. “Fulcrum Microsystems’ switch silicon, already recognized for high performance and low latency, complements Intel’s leading processors and Ethernet controllers, and will deliver our customers new levels of performance and energy efficiency while improving their economics of cloud service delivery.”

    10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) networks are one of the fastest-growing market segments in the data center today. As demand for data continues to increase, there is a growing need for high-performance, low-latency network switches to support evolving cloud architectures and the growth of converged networks in the enterprise. Fulcrum Microsystems designs integrated, standards-based 10GbE and 40 Gigabit Ethernet (40GbE) switch silicon that have low latency and workload balancing capabilities while helping provide superior network speeds.

    Cloud computing is driving the convergence of server, storage and network technologies and solutions based around Intel® Xeon® processor solutions. IP Data Center customers need faster and more flexible networking solutions. The acquisition will fulfill an important component in Intel’s strategy to deliver comprehensive data center building blocks, from server processors and technologies to storage and networking.

    “Customers in Web, financial services, technical and high-performance computing market segments appreciate the performance advantages Arista offers with our Extensible Operating System combined with switches based on Fulcrum Microsystems silicon,” said Andy Bechtolsheim, founder, chief development officer and chairman of Arista Networks. “Fulcrum Microsystems has architecture capabilities ideal for low-latency applications, and we are excited about the future possibilities of this technology as Fulcrum is acquired by Intel, the world’s largest semiconductor manufacturer.”

    Founded in 1999, Fulcrum Microsystems is based in Calabasas, Calif. Additional terms of the transaction were not disclosed. The agreement is subject to the approval of Fulcrum Microsystems shareholders, regulatory approval and satisfaction of customary closing conditions. It is expected to close in the third quarter of 2011.
     
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  2. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,838 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,707
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I don't see why Intel would want them unless it has something to do with Lightpeak/Thunderbolt.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Zudeo New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    11 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Damn. Fulcrum agents have Intel? This can't be good. Chuck doesn't approve of this.

    [​IMG]

    In fact, I spoke to him. Here's his reaction.

    [​IMG]

    Not pleased. Not pleased at all.
     
    Mussels and hardcore_gamer say thanks.
  4. Zudeo New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    11 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    On a more serious note, it's probably for the next iteration of Lightpeak. Hopefully for Ivy Bridge or Haswell platforms.
     
  5. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,151 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,678
    I hear Fulcrum and I think....

    [​IMG]

    So Intel now has a MiG-29?
    I sure hope AMD gets a YF-22 soon! :laugh:
     
  6. WarraWarra New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    268 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    If you take the tech that the fulcrum is based on and add it to a cpu for sata replacement you will get what ?
    Maybe a future solution for Sandy-E pci-e 4x sata port issues ?

    + you can expand the networking side to catch up with China's current standards and that would be able to handle the normal 10G and once ready 40G data for a country like China.
    This should give Intel a fair chance at trying to compete if they can catch up. :eek:

    PS> USA we think we will have proper 3.5G for mobile phones eventually, this above is default (2008) 10G mobile data and 40G mobile data, you do the math.
    Imagine 1.5bilion or is it already 3billion Chinese downloading conservatively at 4G speeds on their 8billion (last count) mobile phones on such a network = how much data ??

    Intel can make some money there.

    Off Topic:
    YF-22 maybe not the best choice, maybe read this post about mig and eurofighter.
    http://asian-defence.blogspot.com/2011/06/pakistani-f-16s-shoot-down-raf.html

    Funny how this was not on the news here.
    LOL someone joked about the Fulcrums - Soviet "Fulcrums" and "Flankers"
     
  7. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,151 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,678
    The Raptor is not a Eurofighter.
     
  8. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Intel "bought" a couple of patents and a handful of bright employees. That's all.
     
  9. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,985 (3.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,393
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    thats the point, what intel needs? they have 'everything'
     
  10. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    950 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    Australia
    Ya i think this is the future for the business environment. A computer in one central location and networked ethernet connected monitors.

    Keeps costs down, maintenance down, and security is easier to control.
     
  11. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,838 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,707
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Yup, the F-22 (Y designator is experimental--it is now deployed) in US war games engaged and killed F-18s before they even knew it was in their airspace. The F-22 should never get in a situation where it has to dog fight but, if it does, it has the huge advantage of thrust vectoring over the F-16 and F-18.


    @WarraWarra: What does China have to do with anything? China is way behind the "West" in everything except population count.


    If this technolgy is aimed at LightPeak/Thunderbolt, the earliest we'll see it is in Ivybridge. Most likely, it won't be until the iteration after that. It takes at least 2 years to deploy technology like that and we are likely within a year from the launch of IvyBridge. I think Intel knows better than try to rush something like that in. More likely, I think Intel sees SATA as not advancing quick enough to keep pace with SSD development so they need a generational leap forward. They could get that generational leap from Fulcrum.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Probably because Intel wants to provide a complete datacenter solution. The only question is: When will Intel buy a router maker?
     
  13. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,953 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    [​IMG]
     
  14. sneekypeet

    sneekypeet Unpaid Babysitter Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    21,636 (6.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,159
    Enough with the aviation references already, can we try to stay on topic?
     
  15. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,838 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,707
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Infiniband? That's the norm right now. It can handle up to 1.5 Tb/s putting Fulcrum's technologies to shame. I still think it has something to do with SATA saturation and/or Lightpeak/Thunderbolt.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Infiniband is much more expensive than 10GbE at the infrastructure level. While Infiniband has its advantages (most notably in latency), it is not a replacement for Ethernet in every single Datacenter due to its cost. It is however much better for a pure compute cluster.
     
  17. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,838 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,707
    Location:
    IA, USA
    But that might be what Intel sees in Fulcrum. Maybe they believe Fulcrum has an answer for how to do Lightpeak (or at least Thunderbolt) cheap(er).
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  18. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    You might be right, but Intel already makes 10GbE solutions and has been doing that for the past few years (since 2007). I believe Intel sees a way to make its existing and future 10GbE solutions cheaper and/or more power efficient. I do not think this has anything to do with TB/LP.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page