1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Unveils New Product Plans for High-Performance Computing

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 31, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,228 (11.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,580
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    During the International Supercomputing Conference (ISC), Intel Corporation announced plans to deliver new products based on the Intel Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture that will create platforms running at trillions of calculations per second, while also retaining the benefits of standard Intel processors.

    Targeting high-performance computing segments such as exploration, scientific research and financial or climate simulation, the first product, codenamed "Knights Corner," will be made on Intel's 22-nanometer manufacturing (nm) process – using transistor structures as small as 22 billionths of a meter – and will use Moore's Law to scale to more than 50 Intel processing cores on a single chip. While the vast majority of workloads will still run best on award-winning Intel Xeon processors, Intel MIC architecture will help accelerate select highly parallel applications.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Industry design and development kits codenamed "Knights Ferry" are currently shipping to select developers, and beginning in the second half of 2010, Intel will expand the program to deliver an extensive range of developer tools for Intel MIC architecture. Common Intel software tools and optimization techniques between Intel MIC architecture and Intel Xeon processors will support diverse programming models that will place unprecedented performance in the hands of scientists, researchers and engineers, allowing them to increase their pace of discovery and preserve their existing software investments. The Intel MIC architecture is derived from several Intel projects, including "Larrabee" and such Intel Labs research projects as the Single-chip Cloud Computer.

    "The CERN openlab team was able to migrate a complex C++ parallel benchmark to the Intel MIC software development platform in just a few days," said Sverre Jarp, CTO of CERN openlab. "The familiar hardware programming model allowed us to get the software running much faster than expected."

    "Intel's Xeon processors, and now our new Intel Many Integrated Core architecture products, will further push the boundaries of science and discovery as Intel accelerates solutions to some of humanity's most challenging problems," said Kirk Skaugen, vice president and general manager of Intel's Data Center Group. "The Intel® MIC architecture will extend Intel's leading HPC products and solutions that are already in nearly 82 percent of the world's top supercomputers. Today's investments are indicative of Intel's growing commitment to the global HPC community."

    TOP500
    The 35th edition of the TOP500 list, which was announced at ISC, shows that Intel continues to be the platform of choice in high-performance computing, with 408 systems, or nearly 82 percent, powered by Intel processors. More than 90 percent of quad-core-based systems use Intel processors, with the Intel Xeon 5500 series processor nearly doubling its presence with 186 systems. Intel chips also power three systems in the top 10, and four out of five new entrants in the top 30. Seven systems contain the recently announced Intel Xeon 5600 series processor, codenamed "Westmere-EP," and two systems are powered by the new Intel Xeon 7500 series processor, codenamed "Nehalem-EX."

    The Intel Xeon processor 5600 series is playing the vital role in the highest-ranked system from China in the history of the Top500. The No. 2 system, located at the National Supercomputing Center (NSCS) in Shenzhen, reached 1.2 petaflops on the Linpack benchmark with a Dawning TC3600. NSCS is a hub for research and innovation in China.

    The semi-annual TOP500 list of supercomputers is the work of Hans Meuer of the University of Mannheim, Erich Strohmaier and Horst Simon of the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, and Jack Dongarra of the University of Tennessee.

    New Exascale Lab
    To meet the growing challenge of running large-scale simulations in the multi petaflops and exaflops range of computing, Intel, Forschungszentrum Julich (FZJ) and ParTec will announce a multi-year commitment to create the ExaCluster Laboratory (ECL) at Julich. The lab will develop key technologies, tools and methods to power multi petaflops and exaflops machines, focusing on the scalability and resilience of those systems. ECL will become the latest member of Intel Labs Europe, a network of research and innovation centers spanning Europe.
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  2. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,157 (5.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,959
    Location:
    Home
    I see, CUDA has competition.
  3. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,539 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    298
    Nothing special people move along
  4. filip007

    filip007 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    151 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Well ok but it looks like graphics card.

    Intel is not interested in games that's the problem.
  5. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,700 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,861
    Ok, Intel powers 82% of the top 500 systems, but only 30% of the top 10 systems. Kind of tells you what the guys at the extreme top really think of Intel...:D
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  6. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    Those top 70% are mostly IBM babies ?
  7. InnocentCriminal

    InnocentCriminal Resident Grammar Amender

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,479 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    I wonder how many Meme's will be created with that first image?
    robn says thanks.
  8. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    these things are probably killers in terms of HPC computing but with the cost definitely being over 1 grand I don't think we'll ever get one for casual use, but still, 22nm, where are these things going to be made, I didn't think there was a good process for that yet.

    Nvidia will probably have the GTX4XX and Telsa problems corrected by next year also though,

    I wish IBM did make GPU's though lol
  9. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
    So they scrapped Larrabee and made this from it?
  10. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,214 (1.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,442
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
  11. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
    Yeah, well it's not coming out soon and this think looks like it is. It's in GPU form factor and has multiple processors in one core = larrabee without the directx drivers.

    I'm just not sure what the difference here or is there anything. They just didn't get enough performance out of larrabee as a graphics card so they made it to a cruncher?
  12. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,572 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    was a research piece. it's currently been shelved, or basically its not being researched right now.
  13. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,572 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    Bump bc this needs more attention lol. so what exactly is this card supposed to be/do? is it like a super CPU on a card or what???
  14. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
    It's a new MIC :laugh:

    At lest they could name it and would certainly help if the news said that it was "parallel-multiprocessor-core-add-on-card-thingy" :roll:

    Maybe there should have been some history on the whole MIC thing, I haven't seen any old products on that, if this is a new one :ohwell: I like the shiny pictures, but this news doesn't make sense, so someone please elaborate on the a_ump question :)
    a_ump says thanks.
  15. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    I think thats a larabee since GPUs are pretty much like this MIC 'concept'.
  16. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,329 (6.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,358
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Hello Larrabee, without the GPU API. :( I still hope they don't give up on making that API.



    Yup, except I don't know what Cray uses for processors. Most of those in the top 10 are older IBM super computers but they've been expanded virtually every year keeping them on top.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. majestic12

    majestic12

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    552 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    157
    Location:
    boondocks, Michigan
    I was almost expecting to see wood screws in Intel's card -oh wait... wrong company.
  18. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,572 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    so it's larrabee, only without GPU capapbilities and massive CPU whorepowa?
  19. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,329 (6.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,358
    Location:
    IA, USA
    It's got the CPU power for sure (most likely runs on a simplified x86 instruction set) but creating the necessary drivers to make many CPUs function as a GPU just isn't practical at this time. I think it is because Intel knows they are up against a lot of competition and their architecture just can't be priced competitively with standard GPUs.

    Think about it: Larrabee the HPC product could sell for $1000+ to businesses. Larrabee the GPU can't get much sells over $300. If Intel started selling Larrabee GPUs at $300, the $1000+ market is gone because they'll just buy the GPUs instead of the HPC branded products.

    There's also the design issues invloving using CPU architectures for GPU work. CPUs are far more capable which causes reduced FLOP performance so you need a more CPUs to equate to a competitor's single GPU.

    Nevermind the difficulties of authoring a DirectX x86 driver and OpenGL x86 driver.

    Larrabee as a GPU was always far fetched. If it happens though, it would be one awesome card to have.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,572 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    eventually it'll get there. i mean eventually there's going to be nothing but a UPU, universal processing unit(yes, i came up with that name all by myself :)), hence why larrabee is only shelved and not scrapped. It still has potential, just perhaps ahead of its time.
  21. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,228 (11.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,580
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Yes, you can say that. They can salvage Larrabee as an HPC processor, or watch Radeon HD 5770 pwn it as a graphics card.
  22. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,572 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    eh, i wouldn't say scrapped, honestly i could see them picking it up again later down the time line.
  23. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
    Thanks to all, now I got it :)
  24. djisas

    djisas

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,712 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    324
    Location:
    Darkness

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page