1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel X48 Coming - Slightly Faster Than X38

Discussion in 'News' started by JacKz5o, Sep 3, 2007.

  1. JacKz5o New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    485 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Rumors have started circulating about Intel's new X48 chipset. The new chipset is said to be faster and offer better overclocking than the previous X38, which should be coming this week. The X48 plans to appear only a few short weeks after the X38 is launched.

    Source: NordicHardware
     
  2. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    XD if X38 runs the new G0 chips and penryn chips to the fsbwall.....X48 will be almost pointless unless you are going for world records.
     
  3. nflesher87

    nflesher87 Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,516 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Location:
    Texas
    intel, slow it the heck down you mofo...take a deep breath and relax!!!!
    :roll:
     
  4. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037 (1.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    535
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    I think they are scared AMD is going to blitz them with Phenom like A64 did to Nutburst :p
     
  5. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,987 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,565
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    AMD's lineup certainly is a factor in Intel's latest run, but shouldn't it be AMD the one to be releasing their already delayed processors by this time? I mean, at this pace Intel will be at least one generation ahead of phenom by the time it's released...
     
  6. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,829 (4.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,642
    im pretty tired of keeping up with all this...perhaps it is time to go console.
     
  7. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    NOOOOOO
     
  8. Agility

    Agility

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,683 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Singapore
    Agreed...
     
  9. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,812 (3.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Ive already gone console. But anywho, this would trump the X38 and there wouldnt be a point in the x38 coming out.
     
  10. Xtant25

    Xtant25

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    178 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Tulsa,OK
    The X48 is just a speed binned version of the X38....Long story short it will overclock like crazy but have a big price tag on it.
     
  11. Rodster New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    155 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I say no as well, i've gone back to PC gaming. You have M$ who's selling Yugo's and the PS3 ain't worth the hype.
     
  12. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,507
    What PC gamer is going to buy it? DDR3 is a pure bust right now and cost is to high to buy it. I have found no tangible performance benefits with DDR3 other then the fact that you can OC it. Now if X38 or X48 allows the use of DDR2 it maybe worth while...if you are so inclined to upgrade. Also with the early reviews of Wolfdale and Yorkfield they offer minimal improvements over C2D and C2Q. However, they OC with lower voltage and thus a bit cooler (which means nothing when you already water cool, for example). Be that as it may, as it stands now there is no real benefit this upgrade path at this time (when price is an issue). The benefits if any, are minimal at best when compared to how much you will spend on new Penryn, DDR3 and Bearlake chipset MB vs C2D/C2Q, DDR2 and 975/965 chipset MB.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2007
  13. nflesher87

    nflesher87 Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,516 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Location:
    Texas
    don't you even joke :slap:

    :)
     
  14. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,240 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    Agreed.
     
  15. p_o_s_pc

    p_o_s_pc F@H&WCG addict

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,009 (4.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,183
    Location:
    Newark ohio
    why don't they just skip the x38 than and go for the better one? but if they did that than they would lose out on money. AMD needs to just get there new chip-set and CPUs put and wipe the floor with Intel but i don't think that will happen.The only way to find out is to wait.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. insider Guest

    X38 are likely (not confirmed yet) speed bins of X48 that failed to reach the higher clocks, they are the same chipset with the X48 being the best hand picked samples. ;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 4, 2007

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page