1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel X58 to Retire in 2012

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    In 2012, it's curtain's for Intel's iconic Nehalem/Tylersburg platform, with the company issuing the Intel X58 chipset a schedule for discontinuation. The chipset has exactly 12 more months to attain EOL (end of life) status. Intel will continue to take orders for Intel X58 till April 27, 2012, the last of these orders will have shipped by October 12, 2012. Intel X58 + ICH10/R is the de facto chipset for Intel's Core i7 client processors in the LGA1366 package.

    To motherboard vendors, the X58 I/O Hub (northbridge) is priced at US $39, and another $14 for the ICH10R southbridge. In November 2011, Intel is releasing the proper successor for the Nehalem/Tylersburg platform, the Sandy Bridge-E/Patsburg, consisting of Core i7 processors in the LGA2011 package, and Intel X79 chipset.

    [​IMG]

    Source: TechConnect Magazine
     
  2. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    RIP I7 920, you have served me WELL :)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,612 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    261
    Location:
    London
    Goodbye to a great and epic platform.
     
  4. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,175 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,706
    This is one platform I wish I would have had.
     
  5. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    384 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Can't help but think my s775 platform is getting old.
     
  6. Isenstaedt

    Isenstaedt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    211 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Lol I read 'Intel to retire in 2012' :D

    Sad day :(
     
  7. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I went from a AMD Phenom II 965BE C3 (OCED to 3.9ghz) to a Intel I7-920 (OCed to 4ghz) and it was a real eye opener! Game FPS increased from 15-20 FPS in most games easy and multi-tasking was a breeze. Im glad I did it in the long run.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. mrw1986

    mrw1986

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,111 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Location:
    Wallingford, CT
    I sympathize with both of you...still running a Q6600.
     
  9. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,778 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,004
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    No RIP on my end. If everything goes well it will continue to serve me well for some more time.
    Only thing that i see required to upgrade is graphic card.
     
  10. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I just say that cause I know that even tho sandy bridge out performs it quite well that the newer SB and IB will murder it soon enough
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. Ferrum Master

    Ferrum Master

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    710 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    Location:
    Rīga
    Intel X79 is a complete downgrade in terms of technology... DMI instead of Quick Path... just a relabeled P67 imho...

    Sandy Bridge users can rest... users on X58 should consider buying Gulftown if they are need of raw perfomance and that's it...
     
  12. DarthCyclonis New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    69 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I agree. The X79 chipset is a step backwards for features from the X58. The fact there is not native USB 3.0 is mind numbing to say the least. The only thing the platform as going for it is the Sandy Bridge architecture which is faster and the AVX instruction set (it will be sometime before it is really utilized).

    I think I will stay with my i970 for awhile longer.
     
  13. Shihabyooo

    Shihabyooo

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    567 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    A sad excuse of a country called Sudan.
    A legend never dies !. Unless you OC it to 5GHz on air :roll:

    tis a shame such a platform has to be dropped. But hey, this is how it goes in the PC world. All hail the X58. All hail the i7 9xx :rockout: :respect:
     
  14. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    X58 has native USB 3.0? If not, how is X79 a step backwards in this context?

    Not just AVX:
    • PCI-Express 3.0
    • PCIe Root complex is inside the CPU package
    • There is no northbridge chip. X79 is a PCH, that's one less hot chip to bother about
    • Quad-Channel DDR3-2133 MHz capable, a 166% memory bandwidth increase over Westmere 6c/12t
    That said,
    You really have no need to upgrade from i7-970 to anything for the next 2~3 years. After that, the rumored requirement of UEFI with future operating systems (if it's true), will force you to upgrade.
     
  15. WarraWarra New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    268 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    The x58 guys with top of the line cpu's might want to wait for this time next year x79.

    Some reviews / testing I have seen of the x79 and sandy-e is not that great.
    It can barely keep pace with the stock 2600k and other area the pure extra cores does deliver but not as much as expected.
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/sandy-bridge-e-and-x79-preview/

    Going from anything equivalent to the 2500k to sandy-e is a okay upgrade but only if you have too. Might be disappointed, gaming wise definitely yes you would be disappointed.
    Anything below a 2500k/equivalent is a good upgrade to sandy-e.

    IE: more or less, raw power 2600k = 2960xm = 2x Q9550 = 90% of 980X EE.
    Gaming sandy-e is trying to keep pace with the 2600k and just barely gets better scores sometimes for raw power, not for gaming.

    Comparison chart: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Processors-Benchmarklist.2436.0.html

    After release and once there is actual proper testing and drivers for the x79 then we would know if the x58 death was a waste or not.
    Intel should have their game back on in June 2012.
     
  16. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,840 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Q6600 ALL the WAY!! I'm waiting for ever! I think im going to upgrade to a whole new computer when the AMD 8970 comes out, and get whatever CPU is around then.
     
  17. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    When you retire that Q6600 think of me and my s478 AGP! Gwd damn I keep trying with the competitions! ;)
     
  18. CyberDruid

    CyberDruid New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,888 (1.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,100
    Location:
    On top of a mountain
    [​IMG]
     
  19. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,551 (3.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,664
    I have been loving the X58 for over two years now (great for crunching power - WCG). I am not planning to upgrade from the i7 970 until the X79 has shown us what it can do:)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Sad to see it go, was an amazing platform, but you can't say it's a step up on x79 until it comes out.
     
  21. Eva01Master

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    75 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Location:
    Caracas/Venezuela.
    I'm still using the well aged Q6600, but if X79 is the monster I believe it will be then I'll build a new PC using the very best Intel processor out there :)
     
  22. Makaveli

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    430 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    A legend that is for sure.

    Nehalem has been a great socket and she will last me along as socket 939 on the amd side did.

    i'm planning on putting a 980 in this badboy and getting alteast another 2 years out of this platform with only a GPU upgrade maybe in a year.
     
  23. TheOne

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    225 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    X-Bit Lab in June claimed to have seen a document that suggested that the X79 will have support for 1366 CPU's.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page