1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Ivy Bridge-E in Q4 2012, Compatible with LGA2011 and X79

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Nov 17, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Earlier this week, Intel launched the fastest desktop processors under its Core i7 "Sandy Bridge-E" platform, with is partners, motherboard, memory and cooler vendors. Less than a week into its shelf life, Sandy Bridge-E already has a successor taking shape at Intel, slated for the fourth quarter of 2012, but that's far from being the most interesting part of this news. According to a new internal slide scored by a source at XFastest, Ivy Bridge-E will be compatible with today's Intel X79 platform, and LGA2011 socket.

    Suddenly, Sandy Bridge-E makes for a sweeter deal because its platform longevity (for upgrades) is at least two years. Ivy Bridge-E, like Ivy Bridge LGA1155, will be built on the 22 nanometer silicon fabrication process. We don't expect Ivy Bridge-E to be much more than an optical shrink of today's Sandy Bridge-E silicon, but the shrink could leave scope for enabling some of its components otherwise locked out for the Core processor family. Sandy Bridge-E silicon physically holds 8 cores and 20 MB of L3 cache, but the fastest Core processor based on it has just 6 of those cores, and 15 MB of L3 enabled. The source at XFastest says that while Ivy Bridge-E is slated for Q4 2012, the LGA1155 Ivy Bridge will launch across Q1 and Q2 of 2012 (March~April).

    [​IMG]

    Source: XFastest
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2011
  2. KieX

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,408 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,461
    Location:
    London, UK
    3D Transistors as per IvyBridge perhaps? Should help reduce the TDP of these CPU's for starters :)
  3. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,823 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Sounds like I maybe paying newegg a visit and get me a new computer my Q6600 is getting a little old now:rolleyes:
  4. mstenholm

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,029 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,139
    So if we look for it we will find the extra 2 cores? That would be a deal-breaker.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  5. John Doe Guest

  6. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,169 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Too......many.....sweet choices........brain......hurting
    Must. Have ivy #s before ordering 2011 waiting hurts too
  7. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,223 (1.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,450
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    ooooooh.

    This needs to be confirmed. One of the reasons i planned on not going x79 was due to no clear upgrade path (a la x58). But if this is true....... I'll be getting my x79 hat back on.

    Do i need x79? Hell no.
    Do i want it? Yup.

    My countries economy is screwed, if i buy my SB-E rig, I'm doing my part to help out. :D
  8. John Doe Guest

    X58 is still a solid base, not much to gain with the power consumption and gaming advantage (lack of) on SB-E. I'd go SLi, then do Ivy-E. :)
  9. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,889 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    383
    Hell yer ill be grabbing one of these next fall :D
  10. John Doe Guest

    Yeah, I'm holding up for Sandy still. If I had 3 GB 580's, I'd do it. But meh. :D
  11. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    That's what I wanted to hear, give me an 8 core by the end of 2012 and I'll be happy...
    My 3930K is arriving though :) Can't wait :rockout:
  12. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    470 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    was anybody NOT expecting this???
  13. johnspack

    johnspack

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,350 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    846
    Location:
    Nelson B.C. Canada
    Sooner the better,.. once everyone starts upgrading to these, I can buy a used sb-e system. Hurry up intel!!!
  14. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,694 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    957
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Nice, :rockout: my Rampage IV Extreme is in the mail, and now the investment just seems more justified, it's also a good cadence for system upgrades, and no need to replace neither my P67, nor my X79 boards this time around ;)
  15. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    I'm looking forward to the LGA1155 Ivy Bridge myself.
  16. John Doe Guest

    I agree, that and Ivy-E with Extreme chips (if they OC better).

    I don't know where do these people get the idea to upgrade as far as to SB-E... especially when they already have top-end, more suited chips like a 2600k or a Gulftown 980x... the benches are out. It only pulls more power while working hotter. Doesn't help in games and so it's a waste for gaming.
  17. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    Yeah, but a boon for those of us that do heavy encoding.
  18. WarraWarra New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    268 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Think Intel knows it made too big hype about their Sandy-e's and now to save the company they have finally done something that benefit user with this same socket AMD trick. Good stuff Intel.

    +1 Wile E
    Yup it might not be good for gaming but map developers and other can use anything that Intel can put together and then still need DrQueue to string several pc's together and do a decent render.

    Online Clouds is obsolete / buggy / useless, home user would need all the power they can micro data center / home HPC themselves even if using DrQueue to render with. Home pc is not dead, it is just getting started.
  19. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,761 (4.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,643
    Location:
    US
    1Q 2013 they all should be out and hopefully reasonably priced for me replacing my system too.

    Although if they say some thing about a new slot i might wait for that lol.
  20. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    367 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    51
    Good news but I fear Intel has alienated most people with the SB-E pricing.

    Even I can't validate spending $550 on a CPU.
  21. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,169 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Your right no sane reason.....but I will anyway:) just waiting for cofirmation that sbe will be faster than ivy. Want the full featured boards and chipset too.
  22. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,743 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    4th Q 2012 is a long way off. And with Overpriced SB-E's out right now, it sounds to me it's a great time to do a minor or massive upgrade to either a Core i7 2600k and/or Core i5 2500 and/or AMD FX 8150/20. Depends on your price range.
  23. ramcoza New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    17 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Who said those are overpriced? When Intel announced the SB-E, the people, who follow or even know Intel's products estimated how much it will cost.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page