1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Jen-Hsun Huang (NVIDIA): ''We Underestimated RV770''

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Aug 15, 2008.

  1. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    185 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    The 4870 is slower in 50% of the tested games than the 280.

    I'll reverse that logic around and say 280 is slower than the 4870 then ok?
    captainskyhawk says thanks.
  2. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    185 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    Higher bus width is considerably more complex in area, cost, design than just buying GDDR5 chips which cost almost the same as GDDR3 chips.

    Trust me.
  3. Scrizz

    Scrizz

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,851 (1.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    382
    Location:
    Florida, US
    The Gddr5 makes a huge difference, wish I had it :cry:
  4. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    I have to agree with tk, the difference between the GTX280 and 4870 is 20% tops

    maybe not even that high
    X1REME says thanks.
  5. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    Even in Crysis its really close...This comes from my good buddy that managed to blow one of his 3 GTX280s :D

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYnXxI1UjxE

    I say he did a great job with the editing the 4 videos together :toast:
  6. captainskyhawk

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    55 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    I'd say that considering the 4870 actually bests the 280 in 50% of games up to 1920, it's hardly slower -- I'd say they were pretty much neck to neck, with the 280 having some benefits at even higher resolutions.
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,238 (11.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,583
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    The Sun rises in Sunnyvale, sets in Tokyo.
  8. knowledge123 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    42 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    I would hope that this would put them in a more humble and reflective mood; after their 'we're going to open a can of whoop-ass' :)rolleyes:) comments and smack talking I am glad that ATi have lived up to and beyond what nVida thought that they were capable of. :toast: :cool: :slap:
    Let us hope that they won't be as stuck-up about themselves. nVidia are a good company, but i feel that in recent times that they have grown too big for their boots, and I'm very happy that ATi have put them back in line. :)
  9. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    You also realize that the 4870's native ram speed is actually 100Mhz lower than the 50's, right? The 70's check in at 900Mhz, the 50's check in at 999Mhz. Bump that GDDR5 to 999Mhz, and see what performance differences you come up with.
    Do you realize that it is more expensive to increase the bit width of the bus than it is to use GDDR5?
  10. blueskynis

    blueskynis New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    297 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Location:
    Serbia, Nis
    High latency does not impact the performance of GPUs like it does impact CPUs.
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2008
  11. candle_86 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,916 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    233
    If you rememeber anything you'd know Nvidia keeps ATI in check, not the other way around. This would be the second time ATI has a decent card out, and the last time that happened Nvidia fought back hard.

    FX5800 was a joke, FX5900Ultra was actully faster in games of its day than the 9800Pro, it wasn't untill the next gen GPU's arrived did the FX5900Ultra loose its place, but the 6800Ultra was tied with the x800XT, and the 6800GT soundly trumped the x800PRo. When ATI got cocky with the x850XT a few months later the 7800GTX, ATI got cockcy 7800GTX 512, ATI tried again 7900GTX, and again ATI tried so we got the 7950GX2. ATI offered little to no threat to Nvidia for 2007 and half of 2008. Nvidia doesn't like to loose, all ATI did was wake a sleeping beast.
    Solaris17 says thanks.
  12. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    ATI didn't get cocky. How in hell did you come to that conclusion? First, the 5900Ultra didn't beat the 9800Pro, and even if it did happen to match it in some games, ATI still had the 9800XT.

    7800GTX might have been the answer to X850, but ATI answered right back with X1800. Then nVidia released 7900, and ATI threw X1900 in their face. I can't remember if 7950 or 1950 came out first, but that doesn't matter, ATI either matched, or beat nVidia in every price segment at that time. They just never put out an answer to GX2. They didn't have to. The driver support for it was so terrible, it died before it could ever take off.

    Your fanboyism has blinded you to what ACTUALLY happened. NV didn't take a solid lead until they released 8800, which ATI left unanswered for much too long.
    tkpenalty and Zubasa say thanks.
  13. newconroer

    newconroer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,886 (1.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    272

    If you 'hate' Crysis, then you should be laughing at the absurdity that is the 4870 X2, (or a GTX 280) for that matter.


    :)


    We don't have any proof about Nvidia using DDR5, even if they said they might down the road. PROOF, is when it's in your system, and WORKING.

    Despite that lower latency, in theory should do wonders for your system performance, unfortunatley it doesn't. And it probably doesn't as much as we'd like to think with GPUs, however I find it's usually the other way around.
    I would continue to take lower latency memory over higher frequency, definatley on a graphics card. Random access seeking time is far more important to me than bandwidth, especially if the bus is twice the size as well.

    DDR3 has proven itself to be very good memory for GPUs, DDR5 has proven itself to be acceptable memory for GPUs. That's two entirely different things.
  14. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    candle, if gddr5 is just marketing, how much do u have to lose that nvidia will leave gdd3 soon?
  15. qwerty_lesh

    qwerty_lesh

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    532 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    altho i agree with most of whats said here, i dont feel that ati's 2xxx series was all that good, from what ive seen they really didnt make much of a comeback untill they released the 3xxx series, i know where i work nvidia was still popular for price and performance untill the 3xxx series got released. and yeah the 4xxx series rocks, they perform very well and are cheaper then current nvidia counterparts.
  16. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,410 (5.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,349
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    I really dont know why some get so antagonised about this gfx card war, it's pretty simple really, one side comes out on top sometimes, the other side other times....thats gotta be good right? good for us consumers at least, so now we find ourselves in a position that ATi has the fastest single card solution and NVidia the 2nd fastest, ATi just about the 3rd with NVidia just about the fourth, so what.....but to say that just because the "other side" to your preference brings a techonolgy to the table that pushes the boundries of performance (AKA GDDR5) that its pointless is TBH, fanboism of the highest order......and thats coming from a fanboi!

    Enjoy the technology, enjoy the breakthroughs and enjoy the competative pricing that brings because no doubt, down the line the "other side" will edge in front....and when they do, things get even cheaper! :rockout:
  17. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,901 (8.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,486
    Ya know you guys are arguing for nothing. He didnt say ATI anywhere! I think hes talking about Intels IGPU :laugh:

    Anyway ATI has won this match. No arguing this by any logic. However this is a war not a battle so to both teams..."ALEMEN FOWARD!" :rockout:
  18. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,238 (11.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,583
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    He said GPU, not IGP. Intel doesn't make discrete GPUs now. Obviously he wasn't referring to S3 Graphics.

  19. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,901 (8.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,486
    Your right. I was just joking anyway ;) I think its pretty clear what he was saying.
  20. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,525 (13.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,922
    Exactly. People argue for the sake of arguing thinking thier view is more important or more correct then the other's for the sake of boosting thier self-esteem. I like Huang's statement as it's honest. It's not something that is seen very much.
  21. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    185 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    We should make non-constructive arguments a bannable offense, that would silence alot of fanboys in my opinion.
  22. Viscarious New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    951 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    149
    I cant stop laughing at all of you people!

    Buy what you want and shut up. Play your games and be happy. If you want to play the latest games then buy the best card from your favorite company but cut all the bashing and biased remarks. Your not doing anything but raising your blood pressure and starting useless arguments.

    Megasty's sig says everything anyone should really give a damn about. "gods are created through gaming not 3dmark..." Who gives a crap about your 22,000 3Dmark score when you go 3 and 22 in Call of Duty 4.

    I know this wont stop anything so I'll come back to get another good laugh in. :D
    Megasty and cdawall say thanks.
  23. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,650 (7.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,971
    Location:
    some AF base
    i got 22 and 3 with a 6200TC hehe
    Viscarious says thanks.
  24. Viscarious New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    951 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    149
    Exactly. Ride that card hard till it dies!
  25. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    I really don't get it when it comes to the fanboism. These are gfx cards not baseball teams. Gfx card performance is set in stone right off the production block. They have a variable range of operation due to bin & driver issues. Huang's statement is very suitable to them being the gfx leaders for the last 2 years. They got too complacent & it costed them, but its not the end of the world. NV will always be NV.
    Viscarious says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page