1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Lenovo Debuts First Netbook with NVIDIA ION Graphics Processor

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 25, 2009.

  1. Weer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,417 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    New York / Israel
    Yes, obviously. I was convinced he meant that Atom 330 had still only 512K, meaning each core had either 256K or 512K shared.
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,240 (11.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,583
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    You said:

    ...in context of discussing threaded applications, which doesn't make it "obvious" you know that. Anyway, try to be less confrontational with your counter-arguments.
  3. Weer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,417 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    New York / Israel
    Actually, it does perfectly. The rest of that sentence is "Atom 330 is twice as good as Atom N270", which proves I knew that the 1MB was not shared, for if it was, Atom 330 > 2xN270. Not to mention it would have refuted lemon's theses. I only meant to suggest that Atom 330 is faster in all, not per thread. That is clear and obvious. No, the context only became threaded applications later. At first, I simply meant to address his wrongful statement of Atom 330 having only 512KB of cache, which was perfectly justifiable to assume.

    I may be confrontational, but at least I'm not condescending.
  4. Rexter

    Rexter New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    194 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Denmark
    Whoops! I meant the ordinary dual-core 330.
  5. Cheeseball

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    652 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    79
    Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (yes, it does do proper DXVA with a 9400M/9400GT)

    CoreAVC (CUDA-support)
  6. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,240 (11.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,583
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Right now I approve of neither.
  7. Gzero New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Messages:
    718 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Location:
    Scotland
    Fails miserably when a certain fansubbing group mix it with a rubbish res for ATI cards. I haven't tested with Nv, but just to let people know.
    It works fantastic with normal/proper resolutions.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page